CAGS and ACS Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 41. Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
作者信息
Dixon Elijah, Fowler Dennis L, Ghitulescu Gabriela
出版信息
Can J Surg. 2012 Jun;55(3):204-6. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012012.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
CAGS and ACS Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 41. Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.《中国普通外科杂志》与《外科学循证医学评论》。41. 急性胆囊炎早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成本效用分析
Can J Surg. 2012 Jun;55(3):204-6. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012012.
2
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD005440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub2.
3
Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机研究。
Ann Surg. 1998 Apr;227(4):461-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001.
4
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎：一项前瞻性随机试验
Surg Endosc. 2004 Sep;18(9):1323-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9230-6. Epub 2004 Jul 7.
5
Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy For Acute Cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):570-573.
6
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: comparison of outcomes and costs between early and delayed cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎：早期和延迟胆囊切除术的结局和成本比较。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Dec;18(2 Suppl):40-6.
7
8
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of acute cholecystitis.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2016;117(6):328-31. doi: 10.4149/bll_2016_065.
9
Cost utility of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的成本效用比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):256-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2430-1. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
10
Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效评估。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(89):26-8.
引用本文的文献
1
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more cost-effective than delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.在急性胆囊炎的治疗中，早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术比延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术更具成本效益。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Feb 19;10:119-125. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S149924. eCollection 2018.
2
Managing acute cholecystitis among Medicaid insured in New York State: opportunities to optimize care.管理纽约州医疗补助保险患者的急性胆囊炎：优化护理的机会。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2212-2221. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5693-8. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
3
Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy increases the total hospital stay compared to an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.与急性胆囊炎后早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比，延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术会增加总住院时间：一项随机对照试验的更新荟萃分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Oct;17(10):857-62. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12449. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
4
Early Cholecystectomy Is Superior to Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: a Meta-analysis.早期胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎优于延迟胆囊切除术：一项荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 May;19(5):848-57. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2747-x. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
本文引用的文献
1
Failure to perform cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost.老年患者急性胆囊炎行胆囊切除术失败与发病率、死亡率和费用增加有关。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):668-77, 677-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.031.
2
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的安全性和有效性的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2010 Feb;97(2):141-50. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6870.
3
Cost-utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的成本-效用和信息价值分析。
Br J Surg. 2010 Feb;97(2):210-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6872.
4
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD005440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub2.
5
Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine.循证医学。一种教授医学实践的新方法。
JAMA. 1992 Nov 4;268(17):2420-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032.
Zotero 插件