International Tobacco Control Project, Cancer Council Australia, P.O. Box 4708, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia.
Tob Control. 2012 Nov;21(6):563-8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050222. Epub 2012 May 26.
To illustrate how the tobacco industry' front group, the International Tobacco Growers Association (ITGA), mobilised tobacco farmers to influence the fourth session of the Conference of the Parties (COP4) negotiations and defeat the adoption of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Articles 9 and 10 Guidelines and Articles 17 and 18 progress report.
A review of COP4 documents on Articles 9, 10, 17 and 18 was triangulated with relevant information from tobacco industry reports, websites of British American Tobacco, Philip Morris International and ITGA, presentations by tobacco industry executives and internal industry documents from the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library website.
Philip Morris International and British American Tobacco rejected Articles 9 and 10 draft Guidelines claiming that banning ingredients in cigarettes will render burley leaf less commercially viable making tobacco growers in many countries suffer economic consequences. They claimed the terms 'attractiveness' and 'palatability' are not appropriate regulatory standards. The ITGA launched a global campaign to mobilise farmers to reject the draft Guidelines at COP4 in Uruguay. Tobacco producers, Brazil, Philippines, Tanzania, Zambia, Malawi and Zimbabwe, sent large delegations to COP4 and participated actively in the negotiation on the draft Guidelines. Partial Guidelines on Articles 9 and 10 on product regulation and disclosure were adopted. COP4's work on Article 17 provides guidance on viable alternatives, but the ITGA is opposed to this and continues fight crop substitution.
Despite ITGA's international campaign to thwart the Guidelines on Articles 9 and 10 and a strong representation from tobacco-growing countries at COP4, the outcome after intense negotiations was the adoption of Partial Guidelines and work on Articles 17 and 18 to proceed.
说明烟草业的前团体——国际烟草种植者协会(ITGA)如何动员烟农影响第四届缔约方会议(COP4)谈判,并挫败《烟草控制框架公约》第 9 条和第 10 条准则及第 17 条和第 18 条进度报告的通过。
对 COP4 关于第 9、10、17 和 18 条的文件进行了审查,并与来自烟草业报告、英美烟草公司、菲利普莫里斯国际公司和 ITGA 网站、烟草业高管演讲以及遗产烟草文献库网站上的内部行业文件的相关信息进行了三角验证。
菲利普莫里斯国际公司和英美烟草公司拒绝了第 9 条和第 10 条准则草案,声称禁止香烟中的成分将使白肋烟在商业上的可行性降低,使许多国家的烟农遭受经济后果。他们声称“吸引力”和“口感”这两个术语不是适当的监管标准。ITGA 在乌拉圭举行的第四届缔约方会议上发起了一场动员烟农反对准则草案的全球运动。烟草生产商巴西、菲律宾、坦桑尼亚、赞比亚、马拉维和津巴布韦派出了庞大的代表团参加第四届缔约方会议,并积极参与准则草案的谈判。关于产品监管和披露的第 9 条和第 10 条部分准则获得通过。第四届缔约方会议关于第 17 条的工作提供了可行替代方案的指导,但 ITGA 反对这一点,并继续反对作物替代。
尽管 ITGA 开展了国际运动来阻挠第 9 条和第 10 条准则,并且烟草种植国在第四届缔约方会议上有强烈的代表性,但经过激烈的谈判,结果是通过了部分准则,并开始就第 17 条和第 18 条开展工作。