• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

邓迪语料库中的频率和可预测性效应:一项眼动分析。

Frequency and predictability effects in the Dundee Corpus: an eye movement analysis.

作者信息

Kennedy Alan, Pynte Joël, Murray Wayne S, Paul Shirley-Anne

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):601-18. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.676054. Epub 2012 May 29.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2012.676054
PMID:22643118
Abstract

Analyses carried out on a large corpus of eye movement data were used to comment on four contentious theoretical issues. The results provide no evidence that word frequency and word predictability have early interactive effects on inspection time. Contrary to some earlier studies, in these data there is little evidence that properties of a prior word generally spill over and influence current processing. In contrast, there is evidence that both the frequency and the predictability of a word in parafoveal vision influence foveal processing. In the case of predictability, the direction of the effect suggests that more predictable parafoveal words produce longer foveal fixations. Finally, there is evidence that information about word class modulates processing over a span greater than a single word. The results support the notion of distributed parallel processing.

摘要

对大量眼动数据语料库进行的分析被用于对四个有争议的理论问题进行评论。结果表明,没有证据表明词频和词可预测性对注视时间有早期交互作用。与一些早期研究相反,在这些数据中几乎没有证据表明先前单词的属性通常会溢出并影响当前的加工过程。相比之下,有证据表明旁中央凹视觉中单词的频率和可预测性都会影响中央凹加工。就可预测性而言,这种效应的方向表明,更具可预测性的旁中央凹单词会产生更长的中央凹注视时间。最后,有证据表明关于词类的信息在大于单个单词的跨度上调节加工过程。这些结果支持分布式并行加工的概念。

相似文献

1
Frequency and predictability effects in the Dundee Corpus: an eye movement analysis.邓迪语料库中的频率和可预测性效应:一项眼动分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):601-18. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.676054. Epub 2012 May 29.
2
Reading strategy modulates parafoveal-on-foveal effects in sentence reading.阅读策略在句子阅读中调节副中央凹对中央凹的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):548-62. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.625094. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
3
Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.正常阅读中的旁中央凹对中央凹的影响。
Vision Res. 2005 Jan;45(2):153-68. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.037.
4
Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.旁中央凹加工中的右视野优势:来自眼动注视相关电位的证据。
Brain Lang. 2009 Nov;111(2):101-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
5
Parafoveal processing in word recognition.单词识别中的中央凹旁加工
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 May;53(2):429-55. doi: 10.1080/713755901.
6
Serial and parallel processing in reading: investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition.阅读中的串行与并行加工:探究中央凹旁正字法信息对非孤立单词识别的影响
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):487-504. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.703212. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
7
An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.超越单词层面的对阅读中眼动的影响:来自英语和法语阅读的证据。
Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(22):3786-801. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
8
The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading.标点和词类对正常阅读中分布式加工的影响。
Vision Res. 2007 Apr;47(9):1215-27. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
9
Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.阅读中 n+2 词的副中央凹到中央凹转移效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):1026-42. doi: 10.1037/a0027735. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
10
Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?文本阅读中副中央凹对中央凹的眼动影响:一个额外的空格会有影响吗?
Vision Res. 2005 Jun;45(13):1693-706. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.010.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic evaluation of Dutch large language models' surprisal estimates in sentence, paragraph and book reading.对荷兰大语言模型在句子、段落和书籍阅读中的意外度估计进行的系统评估。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 18;57(9):266. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02774-4.
2
PoTeC: A German naturalistic eye-tracking-while-reading corpus.PoTeC:一个德国阅读时自然主义眼动追踪语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 30;57(8):211. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02536-8.
3
The Beijing Sentence Corpus II: A cross-script comparison between traditional and simplified Chinese sentence reading.
《北京句子语料库II:繁体中文与简体中文句子阅读的跨文字比较》
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 17;57(2):60. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02523-z.
4
The PSR corpus: A Persian sentence reading corpus of eye movements.PSR语料库:一个波斯语句子阅读眼动语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 11;57(1):14. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02517-x.
5
Prediction in reading: A review of predictability effects, their theoretical implications, and beyond.阅读中的预测:可预测性效应、其理论意义及其他方面的综述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):973-1006. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02588-z. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
6
Hong Kong Corpus of Chinese Sentence and Passage Reading.香港中文句子与篇章阅读语料库。
Sci Data. 2023 Dec 14;10(1):899. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02813-9.
7
Lexical Processing Strongly Affects Reading Times But Not Skipping During Natural Reading.词汇处理对自然阅读过程中的阅读时间有强烈影响,但对跳读没有影响。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Oct 1;7:757-783. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00099. eCollection 2023.
8
Lexical Frequency and Sentence Context Influence the Brain's Response to Single Words.词汇频率和句子语境影响大脑对单个单词的反应。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Feb 10;3(1):149-179. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00054. eCollection 2022.
9
Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability.语言模型比经验可预测性能更好地解释单词阅读时间。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 2;4:730570. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.730570. eCollection 2021.
10
The association of eye movements and performance accuracy in a novel sight-reading task.一项新颖视奏任务中眼动与演奏准确性的关联。
J Eye Mov Res. 2021 Oct 21;14(4). doi: 10.16910/jemr.14.4.5. eCollection 2021.