Department of Occupational Therapy, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jan;35(2):113-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.689919. Epub 2012 May 30.
The iPad application aid for decision-making in occupation choice (ADOC) was developed to measure the client's satisfaction with individualized occupational performance of meaningful and purposeful activities. The present study examined the reliability and validity of individualized satisfaction measurement using the ADOC.
The Japanese version of the ADOC was used by 36 occupational therapists on 92 of their clients (44 males, 48 females, mean age 66.4 ± 17.8 years). Convergent and discriminant validity were examined using Pearson's correlation between ADOC satisfaction score and the Life Satisfaction Index K (LSIK) factors: Factor 1 (satisfaction with life), Factor 2 (optimistic and positive disposition) and Factor 3 (evaluation of own aging). Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Ninety-two clients completed the validation study. Satisfaction with ADOC significantly correlated with LSIK Factor 1 (r = 0.297, p < 0.01), but not with Factors 2 or 3 (r = -0.045 and -0.089, respectively). Of the 92 clients, 78 participated in the test-retest reliability study. Good to moderate correlation was revealed (ICC = 0.712, p < 0.001).
The Japanese version of the ADOC is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring client satisfaction with individualized occupational performance.
iPad 职业选择决策辅助应用程序（ADOC）的开发旨在衡量客户对有意义和有目的的个性化职业表现的满意度。本研究使用 ADOC 检验了个性化满意度测量的可靠性和有效性。
36 名职业治疗师对 92 名患者（44 名男性，48 名女性，平均年龄 66.4 ± 17.8 岁）使用 ADOC 的日语版。使用 Pearson 相关系数检验 ADOC 满意度得分与生活满意度指数 K（LSIK）的因子 1（对生活的满意度）、因子 2（乐观积极的性格）和因子 3（对自己衰老的评价）之间的相关性，以检验其聚合效度和区分效度。采用组内相关系数（ICC）评估重测信度。
92 名患者完成了验证研究。ADOC 满意度与 LSIK 因子 1 显著相关（r = 0.297，p < 0.01），但与因子 2 或因子 3 无关（r = -0.045 和 -0.089）。在 92 名患者中，78 名患者参加了重测信度研究。显示出良好到中度的相关性（ICC = 0.712，p < 0.001）。
ADOC 的日语版是一种用于测量客户对个性化职业表现满意度的有效且可靠的工具。
