• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“成功遗产资助”项目：增强社区实施乳腺癌和宫颈癌循证干预措施的能力。

The SUCCEED Legacy Grant program: enhancing community capacity to implement evidence-based interventions in breast and cervical cancer.

作者信息

Wingfield John Harvey, Akintobi Tabia Henry, Jacobs DeBran, Ford Marvella E

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, 720 Westview Drive, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 May;23(2 Suppl):62-76. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0081.

DOI:10.1353/hpu.2012.0081
PMID:22643555
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4181575/
Abstract

The Southeastern U.S. Collaborative Center of Excellence in the Elimination of Disparities Legacy Grant Program provides funding to increase community-based organizations' capacity to implement evidence-based breast and cervical cancer interventions for African American women. This article describes the development of the grant process, summarizes Legacy grantee outcomes, and discusses lessons learned.

摘要

美国东南部消除差异卓越合作中心遗留资助项目提供资金，以提高社区组织为非裔美国女性实施循证乳腺癌和宫颈癌干预措施的能力。本文介绍了资助流程的制定过程，总结了遗留资助获得者的成果，并讨论了经验教训。

相似文献

1
The SUCCEED Legacy Grant program: enhancing community capacity to implement evidence-based interventions in breast and cervical cancer.“成功遗产资助”项目：增强社区实施乳腺癌和宫颈癌循证干预措施的能力。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 May;23(2 Suppl):62-76. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0081.
2
The Southeastern U.S. Collaborative Center of Excellence in the Elimination of Disparities (SUCCEED): reducing breast and cervical cancer disparities for African American women.美国东南部消除差异卓越合作中心（SUCCEED）：减少非裔美国女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌差异。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 May;23(2 Suppl):49-61. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0079.
3
Breast and cervical cancer disparities in SC: African-American perspective.南卡罗来纳州乳腺癌和宫颈癌差异：非裔美国人视角
J S C Med Assoc. 2006 Aug;102(7):240.
4
The deep South network for cancer control: eliminating cancer disparities through community-academic collaboration.南方癌症控制深度网络：通过社区与学术机构合作消除癌症差异。
Fam Community Health. 2005 Jan-Mar;28(1):6-19. doi: 10.1097/00003727-200501000-00004.
5
Connecting community with campus to address cancer health disparities: a community grants program model.连接社区与校园以解决癌症健康差异：一种社区资助项目模式。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Summer;5(2):207-12. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0027.
6
The development of a community action plan to reduce breast and cervical cancer disparities between African-American and White women.制定一项社区行动计划，以减少非裔美国女性和白人女性在乳腺癌和宫颈癌方面的差异。
Ethn Dis. 2004 Summer;14(3 Suppl 1):S53-60.
7
Community-campus partnership in action: lessons learned from the DuPage County Patient Navigation Collaborative.社区-校园合作实例：从杜佩奇县患者导航协作项目中汲取的经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Spring;8(1):75-81. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0005.
8
Developing a community action plan to eliminate cancer disparities: lessons learned.制定消除癌症差异的社区行动计划：经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Summer;5(2):161-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0013.
9
Community-academic partnerships: lessons learned from replicating a salon-based health education and promotion program.社区-学术伙伴关系：从复制一项基于沙龙的健康教育与促进项目中汲取的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009 Fall;3(3):241-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0084.
10
Using community-based participatory approaches to mobilize communities for policy change.运用基于社区的参与式方法动员社区推动政策变革。
Fam Community Health. 2011 Jan-Mar;34 Suppl 1:S102-14. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e318202ee72.

引用本文的文献

1
Mobilizing community-driven health promotion through community granting programs: a rapid systematic review.通过社区拨款项目调动社区驱动的健康促进：快速系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 1;24(1):932. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18443-8.
2
Measuring capacity to use evidence-based interventions in community-based organizations: A comprehensive, scoping review.衡量社区组织中使用循证干预措施的能力：一项全面的范围综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Jul 11;6(1):e92. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.426. eCollection 2022.
3
A Participatory Evaluation Framework for the Implementation of a Transdisciplinary Center for Health Disparities Research.参与式评估框架在跨学科健康差异研究中心实施中的应用。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):385-392. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.385. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Comorbidities and mammography use interact to explain racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis.合并症和乳房 X 光检查的使用相互作用，解释了诊断时乳腺癌分期的种族/民族差异。
Cancer. 2011 Jul 15;117(14):3252-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25857. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
2
Vital signs: breast cancer screening among women aged 50-74 years - United States, 2008.生命体征：50-74 岁女性的乳腺癌筛查 - 美国，2008 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Jul 9;59(26):813-6.
3
Identification of racial disparities in breast cancer mortality: does scale matter?乳腺癌死亡率中的种族差异识别：规模是否重要？
Int J Health Geogr. 2010 Jul 5;9:35. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-9-35.
4
Cancer control planners' perceptions and use of evidence-based programs.癌症控制规划者对循证项目的认知和使用。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 May-Jun;16(3):E1-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181b3a3b1.
5
Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives.通过对医疗服务提供者评估与反馈以及医疗服务提供者激励措施的系统评价，来增加医疗服务提供者对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的推荐及实施的干预措施。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.008.
6
Client-directed interventions to increase community access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review.以客户为导向的干预措施，以增加社区获得乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的机会：一项系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.001.
7
Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review.以客户为导向的干预措施以提高社区对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的需求：一项系统综述
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S34-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.002.
8
Recommendations for client- and provider-directed interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.关于由客户和提供者主导的干预措施的建议，以增加乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.004.
9
Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival.乳腺钼靶筛查：使用模式及其对乳腺癌生存的估计影响
Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):495-507. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20392.
10
Building effective community-academic partnerships to improve health: a qualitative study of perspectives from communities.建立有效的社区-学术伙伴关系以改善健康：一项关于社区观点的定性研究
Acad Med. 2001 Feb;76(2):166-72. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200102000-00016.