Russ Laura W, Takahashi Lois M, Ho Wendy, Tseng Winston, Ponce Ninez A
University of Illnois, Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Spring;6(1):95-102. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0009.
This paper argues that it is necessary to strengthen Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AA and NHPI) community-based participatory research (CBPR) models that integrate a health policy agenda through dynamic legislative partnerships.
We utilize a case study approach and examine three health research partnership models that impact legislative design and action: The California Program on Access to Care (CPAC), the California Health Benefits Review Program (CHBRP), and the University of California Asian American and Pacific Islander Policy Multicampus Research Program (UC AAPI Policy MRP).
In-depth examination reveals the difficulties of engaging in research that collaborates with multiple parties simultaneously and the specific benefits and challenges in each case.
New directions are needed to deepen legislative engagement potential in CBPR and the translation of policy research that considers the health of all AA and NHPI communities.
本文认为,有必要加强亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民(AA和NHPI)基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)模式,通过动态的立法伙伴关系将健康政策议程纳入其中。
我们采用案例研究方法,审视三种影响立法设计和行动的健康研究伙伴关系模式:加利福尼亚州医疗服务获取项目(CPAC)、加利福尼亚州健康福利审查项目(CHBRP)以及加利福尼亚大学亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民政策多校区研究项目(加州大学AAPI政策MRP)。
深入研究揭示了同时与多方合作开展研究的困难,以及每个案例中的具体益处和挑战。
需要新的方向来深化CBPR中的立法参与潜力,以及考虑所有AA和NHPI社区健康的政策研究的转化。