Cook Won Kim, Weir Rosy Chang, Ro Margeurite, Ko Kathy Lim, Panapasa Sela, Bautista Roxanna, Asato Lloyd, Corina Chung, Cabllero Jeffery, Islam Nadia
Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Spring;6(1):33-41. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0008.
Functionally, many CBPR projects operate through a model of academic partners providing research expertise and community partners playing a supporting role.
To demonstrate how national umbrella organizations deeply rooted in communities, cognizant of community needs, and drawing on the insights and assets of community partners, can lead efforts to address health disparities affecting their constituents through research.
Case studies of two Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander national organizations.
Strategically engaging a diverse range of partners and securing flexible funding mechanisms that support research were important facilitators. Main challenges included limited interest of local community organizations whose primary missions as service or health care providers may deprioritize research.
Efforts to make research relevant to the work of community partners and to instill the value of research in community partners, as well as flexible funding mechanisms, may help to promote community-driven research.
在功能上，许多社区参与式行动研究（CBPR）项目通过一种模式运作，即学术伙伴提供研究专业知识，社区伙伴发挥支持作用。
展示深深扎根于社区、了解社区需求并借鉴社区伙伴的见解和资产的全国性综合组织如何能够通过研究引领努力，以解决影响其选民的健康差距问题。
对两个亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民全国性组织进行案例研究。
战略性地吸引广泛的合作伙伴并确保支持研究的灵活资金机制是重要的促进因素。主要挑战包括当地社区组织兴趣有限，这些组织作为服务或医疗保健提供者的主要使命可能会将研究置于次要地位。
使研究与社区伙伴的工作相关并向社区伙伴灌输研究价值的努力，以及灵活的资金机制，可能有助于促进社区驱动的研究。
