• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传变异影响胰腺癌风险:PanScan 研究中多基因易感性的分析。

Unidentified genetic variants influence pancreatic cancer risk: an analysis of polygenic susceptibility in the PanScan study.

机构信息

Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.

出版信息

Genet Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;36(5):517-24. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21644. Epub 2012 May 29.

DOI:10.1002/gepi.21644
PMID:22644738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10967700/
Abstract

Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have identified several pancreatic cancer (PanCa) susceptibility loci. Methods for assessment of polygenic susceptibility can be employed to detect the collective effect of additional association signals for PanCa. Using data on 492,651 autosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the PanScan GWA study (2,857 cases, 2,967 controls), we employed polygenic risk score (PRS) cross-validation (CV) methods to (a) confirm the existence of unidentified association signals, (b) assess the predictive value of PRSs, and (c) assess evidence for polygenic effects in specific genomic locations (genic vs. intergenic). After excluding SNPs in known PanCa susceptibility regions, we constructed PRS models using a training GWA dataset and then tested the model in an independent testing dataset using fourfold CV. We also employed a "power-replication" approach, where power to detect SNP associations was calculated using a training dataset, and power was tested for association with "replication status" in a testing dataset. PRS scores constructed using ≥ 10% of genome-wide SNPs showed significant association with PanCa (P< 0.05) across the majority of CV analyses. Associations were stronger for PRSs restricted to genic SNPs compared to intergenic PRSs. The power-replications approach produced weaker associations that were not significant when restricting to SNPs with low pairwise linkage disequilibrium, whereas PRS results were robust to such restrictions. Although the PRS approach will not dramatically improve PanCa prediction, it provides strong evidence for unidentified association signals for PanCa. Our results suggest that focusing association studies on genic regions and conducting larger GWA studies can reveal additional PanCa susceptibility loci.

摘要

全基因组关联(GWA)研究已经确定了几个胰腺癌(PanCa)易感性位点。评估多基因易感性的方法可用于检测 PanCa 的其他关联信号的综合效应。使用 PanScan GWA 研究中 492651 个常染色体单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的数据(2857 例病例,2967 例对照),我们采用多基因风险评分(PRS)交叉验证(CV)方法来:(a)确认未识别的关联信号的存在;(b)评估 PRS 的预测价值;(c)评估特定基因组位置(基因内与基因间)多基因效应的证据。在排除已知的 PanCa 易感性区域中的 SNP 后,我们使用训练 GWA 数据集构建 PRS 模型,然后使用四折 CV 在独立测试数据集中测试模型。我们还采用了“功效复制”方法,其中使用训练数据集计算检测 SNP 关联的功效,然后在测试数据集中使用“复制状态”测试功效。使用≥10%全基因组 SNPs 构建的 PRS 评分在大多数 CV 分析中与 PanCa 显著相关(P<0.05)。与基因间 PRS 相比,限制在基因 SNP 上的 PRS 显示出更强的关联。当限制为低成对连锁不平衡的 SNP 时,功效复制方法产生的关联较弱且不显著,而 PRS 结果不受此类限制的影响。虽然 PRS 方法不会显著改善 PanCa 预测,但它为 PanCa 的未识别关联信号提供了强有力的证据。我们的研究结果表明,将关联研究集中在基因区域并进行更大规模的 GWA 研究可以揭示更多的 PanCa 易感性位点。

相似文献

1
Unidentified genetic variants influence pancreatic cancer risk: an analysis of polygenic susceptibility in the PanScan study.遗传变异影响胰腺癌风险:PanScan 研究中多基因易感性的分析。
Genet Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;36(5):517-24. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21644. Epub 2012 May 29.
2
Genome-wide "pleiotropy scan" identifies HNF1A region as a novel pancreatic cancer susceptibility locus.全基因组“多效性扫描”鉴定 HNF1A 区域为新的胰腺癌易感性位点。
Cancer Res. 2011 Jul 1;71(13):4352-8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0124. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
3
Prediction model for pancreatic cancer risk in the general Japanese population.一般日本人群中胰腺癌风险的预测模型。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):e0203386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203386. eCollection 2018.
4
GWAS-based polygenic risk scoring for predicting cerebral artery dissection in the Chinese population.基于 GWAS 的多基因风险评分预测中国人群的脑动脉夹层。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03759-0.
5
Potential functional variants in SMC2 and TP53 in the AURORA pathway genes and risk of pancreatic cancer.AURORA 通路基因 SMC2 和 TP53 中的潜在功能变异与胰腺癌风险。
Carcinogenesis. 2019 Jun 10;40(4):521-528. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgz029.
6
POLARIS: Polygenic LD-adjusted risk score approach for set-based analysis of GWAS data.POLARIS:用于全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据基于集合分析的多基因连锁不平衡调整风险评分方法。
Genet Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;42(4):366-377. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22117. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
Replication and Genetic Risk Score Analysis for Pancreatic Cancer in a Diverse Multiethnic Population.在一个多样化的多民族人群中对胰腺癌进行复制和遗传风险评分分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Dec;29(12):2686-2692. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0963. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
Development and validation of polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes in Chinese women.多基因风险评分在预测中国女性乳腺癌及乳腺癌亚型中的开发和验证。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Apr 8;22(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09425-3.
9
Evaluation of polygenic risk scores for ovarian cancer risk prediction in a prospective cohort study.多基因风险评分在前瞻性队列研究中对卵巢癌风险预测的评估。
J Med Genet. 2018 Aug;55(8):546-554. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105313. Epub 2018 May 5.
10
Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study.基于人群的前瞻性队列研究:东亚常见癌症的多基因风险评分预测。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e82608. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82608.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Approaches of Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in High-Risk Individuals.高危个体胰腺癌监测的当前方法
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Feb 11;56(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01184-1.
2
Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores (PRSs) in Predicting Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Common-Variant and Mixed Scores with Insights into Rare Variant Analysis.多基因风险评分(PRSs)在预测胰腺癌中的效用:对常见变异和混合评分的系统评价与荟萃分析,并对罕见变异分析有所洞察
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 13;17(2):241. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020241.
3
Sex-Related Differences in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Progression and Response to Therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Genome-wide association of bipolar disorder suggests an enrichment of replicable associations in regions near genes.全基因组关联研究发现,双相情感障碍与基因附近区域的可重复关联明显富集。
PLoS Genet. 2011 Jun;7(6):e1002134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002134. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
2
Evaluation of polygenic risk scores for predicting breast and prostate cancer risk.评估多基因风险评分预测乳腺癌和前列腺癌风险。
Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;35(6):506-514. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20600. Epub 2011 May 26.
3
Genome-wide "pleiotropy scan" identifies HNF1A region as a novel pancreatic cancer susceptibility locus.
胰腺导管腺癌进展及对治疗反应中的性别差异
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Nov 26;25(23):12669. doi: 10.3390/ijms252312669.
4
Do Polygenic Risk Scores Add to Clinical Data in Predicting Pancreatic Cancer? A Scoping Review.多基因风险评分在预测胰腺癌方面是否优于临床数据?系统评价。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Nov 1;32(11):1490-1497. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0468.
5
Exploring the genetic architecture of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D.探讨循环 25-羟维生素 D 的遗传结构。
Genet Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;37(1):92-8. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21694. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
全基因组“多效性扫描”鉴定 HNF1A 区域为新的胰腺癌易感性位点。
Cancer Res. 2011 Jul 1;71(13):4352-8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0124. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
4
Estimating missing heritability for disease from genome-wide association studies.从全基因组关联研究估计疾病的遗传缺失率。
Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Mar 11;88(3):294-305. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
5
Polygenic modeling of genome-wide association studies: an application to prostate and breast cancer.全基因组关联研究的多基因建模:在前列腺癌和乳腺癌中的应用。
OMICS. 2011 Jun;15(6):393-8. doi: 10.1089/omi.2010.0090. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
6
Global cancer statistics.全球癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
7
Estimating the total number of susceptibility variants underlying complex diseases from genome-wide association studies.从全基因组关联研究中估计复杂疾病潜在的易感变异总数。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 17;5(11):e13898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013898.
8
Analysing biological pathways in genome-wide association studies.全基因组关联研究中的生物途径分析。
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Dec;11(12):843-54. doi: 10.1038/nrg2884.
9
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
10
Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.常见的单核苷酸多态性解释了人类身高遗传的很大一部分。
Nat Genet. 2010 Jul;42(7):565-9. doi: 10.1038/ng.608. Epub 2010 Jun 20.