Suppr超能文献

风险评估工具在预测性杀人凶手再犯率方面的效用。

The utility of risk assessment instruments for the prediction of recidivism in sexual homicide perpetrators.

机构信息

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2012 Dec;27(18):3553-78. doi: 10.1177/0886260512447570. Epub 2012 May 29.

Abstract

To examine the predictive accuracy of four well established risk assessment instruments (PCL-R, HCR-20, SVR-20, and Static-99) in an important subgroup of sexual offenders, these instruments were assessed retrospectively based on information from forensic psychiatric court reports in a sample of 90 released male sexual homicide offenders (out of an original sample of 166) in Germany. Follow-up information about criminal reconvictions after release were obtained from the federal criminal records. Total scores as well as subscales and single items of these risk assessment instruments did not predict sexual recidivism, and only some of them had moderate predictive power regarding nonsexual violent recidivism. Possible explanations for these unexpected results are the retrospective study design with missing information about influences during the long duration of detention and time after release, the small sample size as well as the possibility that the risk assessment instruments investigated were valid for general sex offender samples, but not for the particular subgroup of offenders with sexually motivated homicides.

摘要

为了检验四个成熟的风险评估工具(PCL-R、HCR-20、SVR-20 和 Static-99)在性犯罪者一个重要亚组中的预测准确性,这些工具基于德国 90 名已释放男性性杀人罪犯(原始样本 166 名)的法医精神病法庭报告中的信息进行了回顾性评估。从联邦犯罪记录中获得了释放后的犯罪重审信息。这些风险评估工具的总得分以及子量表和单项都不能预测性复发,只有其中一些对非性暴力复发具有中等预测能力。对于这些出乎意料的结果,可能的解释是回顾性研究设计,缺乏关于在长期拘留期间和释放后的影响的信息,样本量小,以及所调查的风险评估工具可能对一般性犯罪者样本有效,但对具有性动机杀人的特定罪犯亚组无效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验