• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CONTINT 研究设计和现状:急诊腹正中切口连续与间断关腹的随机对照多中心研究 [NCT00544583]。

Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583].

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Trials. 2012 May 30;13:72. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-72.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-72
PMID:22647387
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3536720/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy for abdominal wall closure has been an issue of ongoing debate. Available studies do not specifically enroll patients who undergo emergency laparotomy and thus do not consider the distinct biological characteristics of these patients. The present randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly applied abdominal wall closure strategies in patients undergoing primary emergency midline laparotomy.

METHODS/DESIGN: The CONTINT trial is a multicenter, open label, randomized controlled trial with a two-group parallel design. Patients undergoing a primary emergency midline laparotomy are enrolled in the trial. The two most commonly applied strategies of abdominal wall closure after midline laparotomy are compared: the continuous, all-layer suture technique using slowly absorbable monofilament material (two Monoplus loops) and the interrupted suture technique using rapidly absorbable braided material (Vicryl sutures). The primary endpoint within the CONTINT trial is an incisional hernia within 12 months or a burst abdomen within 30 days after surgery. As reliable data on this primary endpoint is not available for patients undergoing emergency surgery, an adaptive interim analysis will be conducted after the inclusion of 80 patients, allowing early termination of the trial if necessary or modification of design characteristics such as recalculation of sample size.

DISCUSSION

This is a randomized controlled multicenter trial with a two-group parallel design to assess the efficacy and safety of two commonly applied abdominal wall closure strategies in patients undergoing primary emergency midline laparotomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00544583.

摘要

背景

腹壁关闭的最佳策略一直是一个持续争论的问题。现有的研究并没有专门招募接受紧急剖腹手术的患者,因此没有考虑到这些患者的独特生物学特征。本随机对照试验评估了两种常用的腹壁关闭策略在接受原发性紧急中线剖腹手术患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法/设计:CONTINT 试验是一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验,采用两臂平行设计。招募接受原发性紧急中线剖腹手术的患者。比较两种最常用的中线剖腹术后腹壁关闭策略:使用可缓慢吸收的单丝材料(双 Monoplus 环)进行连续全层缝合技术和使用可快速吸收的编织材料(Vicryl 缝线)进行间断缝合技术。CONTINT 试验的主要终点是术后 12 个月内切口疝或术后 30 天内腹部破裂。由于对于接受紧急手术的患者,关于这个主要终点的可靠数据尚不可用,因此在纳入 80 例患者后将进行适应性中期分析,如果需要,可以提前终止试验或修改设计特征,例如重新计算样本量。

讨论

这是一项随机对照多中心试验,采用两臂平行设计,评估两种常用的腹壁关闭策略在接受原发性紧急中线剖腹手术患者中的疗效和安全性。

试验注册

NCT00544583。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a02/3536720/b32fd7b8f6fb/1745-6215-13-72-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a02/3536720/b32fd7b8f6fb/1745-6215-13-72-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a02/3536720/b32fd7b8f6fb/1745-6215-13-72-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583].CONTINT 研究设计和现状:急诊腹正中切口连续与间断关腹的随机对照多中心研究 [NCT00544583]。
Trials. 2012 May 30;13:72. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-72.
2
Continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy: CONTINT: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00544583].持续与间断关腹在急诊正中切口剖腹术中的应用:CONTINT:一项随机对照试验 [NCT00544583]。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Oct 17;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00517-4.
3
Continuous and interrupted abdominal-wall closure after primary emergency midline laparotomy (CONIAC-trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled single centre trial.初次急诊中线剖腹术后连续与间断腹壁关闭术(CONIAC 试验):一项随机对照单中心试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 23;12(11):e059709. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059709.
4
Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.开腹手术后使用小缝线腹壁闭合术加或不加网片增强进行疝修补(HULC试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3921-3.
5
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound COmplications in elective midline laparotomies after FAscia Closure using two different Techniques Of Running sutures: COFACTOR trial.两种不同连续缝合技术关闭筋膜后择期正中切口手术伤口并发症的随机对照试验研究方案:COFACTOR 试验
Trials. 2020 Jul 2;21(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04507-8.
6
Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.用于预防切口疝及其他伤口并发症的剖腹手术切口闭合方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2.
7
PREBIOUS trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of PREventive midline laparotomy closure with a BIOabsorbable mesh for the prevention of incisional hernia: rationale and design.既往试验:一项关于使用生物可吸收网片预防性中线剖腹手术闭合以预防切口疝的多中心随机对照试验:原理与设计
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Nov;39(2):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
8
The effect on incisional hernia of absorbable barbed suture for midline fascial closure in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal and gastric cancers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.可吸收带刺缝线用于结直肠和胃癌微创手术中正中筋膜闭合对切口疝的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 May 6;24(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07324-x.
9
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of MonoMax® suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy-a controlled prospective multicentre trial: ISSAAC [NCT005725079].经初次正中剖腹手术后使用 MonoMax®缝线进行腹壁缝合的安全性和有效性评估:一项对照前瞻性多中心试验:ISSAAC [NCT005725079]。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;397(3):363-71. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0884-6. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
10
Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541).用于闭合初次择期腹部正中切口的间断或连续可缓慢吸收缝线:一项多中心随机试验(INSECT:ISRCTN24023541)
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):576-82. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec6c8.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy: CONTINT: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00544583].持续与间断关腹在急诊正中切口剖腹术中的应用:CONTINT:一项随机对照试验 [NCT00544583]。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Oct 17;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00517-4.
2
Continuous and interrupted abdominal-wall closure after primary emergency midline laparotomy (CONIAC-trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled single centre trial.初次急诊中线剖腹术后连续与间断腹壁关闭术(CONIAC 试验):一项随机对照单中心试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 23;12(11):e059709. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059709.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ranking of patient and surgeons' perspectives for endpoints in randomized controlled trials--lessons learned from the POVATI trial [ISRCTN 60734227].随机对照试验终点的患者和外科医生观点排名——来自 POVATI 试验的经验教训 [ISRCTN60734227]。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Oct;396(7):1061-6. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0798-3. Epub 2011 May 10.
2
Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery.肝胆胰手术后胆漏:国际肝脏外科研究组定义和严重程度分级。
Surgery. 2011 May;149(5):680-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.002. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
3
Incisional hernia following colorectal cancer surgery according to suture technique: Hughes Abdominal Repair Randomized Trial (HART).
结直肠癌手术后切口疝的缝合技术:Hughes 腹部修复随机试验(HART)。
Br J Surg. 2022 Sep 9;109(10):943-950. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac198.
4
Hughes abdominal closure versus standard mass closure to reduce incisional hernias following surgery for colorectal cancer: the HART RCT.Hughes 腹部关闭术与标准质量关闭术在减少结直肠癌手术后切口疝中的比较:HART RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Aug;26(34):1-100. doi: 10.3310/CMWC8368.
5
Risk factors for incisional hernia according to different wound sites after open hepatectomy using combinations of vertical and horizontal incisions: A multicenter cohort study.开放性肝切除术后采用垂直和水平切口联合方式时不同伤口部位切口疝的危险因素:一项多中心队列研究
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 May 11;5(5):701-710. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12467. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Meta-analysis on Materials and Techniques for Laparotomy Closure: The MATCH Review.剖腹术切口闭合材料和技术的荟萃分析:MATCH 综述。
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1666-1678. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4393-9.
7
Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART)-abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: feasibility trial for a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.休斯腹部修复试验(HART)——降低切口疝发生率的腹壁闭合技术:一项多中心、实用、随机对照试验的可行性试验
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 19;7(12):e017235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017235.
8
Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART) - Abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.休斯腹部修复试验(HART)——降低切口疝发生率的腹壁闭合技术:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Sep 15;17(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1573-0.
9
[Current standards of abdominal wall closure techniques : Conventional suture techniques].[腹壁关闭技术的当前标准:传统缝合技术]
Chirurg. 2016 Sep;87(9):737-743. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0231-0.
10
An implantable sensor device measuring suture tension dynamics: results of developmental and experimental work.一种用于测量缝线张力动态变化的可植入传感器装置:研发与实验工作成果
Hernia. 2016 Aug;20(4):601-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1433-y. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS).
术后肝衰竭:国际肝脏外科研究组织(ISGLS)的定义和分级。
Surgery. 2011 May;149(5):713-24. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
4
Perforator vessel anatomy of the papilla umbilicalis: topography and importance for reconstructive abdominal wall surgery.脐部乳突穿支血管解剖:解剖学特点及其在腹壁重建手术中的重要性。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Nov;395(8):1121-7. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0657-7. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
5
Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis.择期经中线切口关闭术:INLINE 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2010 May;251(5):843-56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d973e4.
6
Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer.直肠前切除术后吻合口漏的定义和分级:直肠癌国际研究组的建议。
Surgery. 2010 Mar;147(3):339-51. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
7
IVC CLAMP: infrahepatic inferior vena cava clamping during hepatectomy--a randomised controlled trial in an interdisciplinary setting.IVC 夹闭:肝切除术时肝下下腔静脉夹闭——多学科环境中的一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2009 Oct 13;10:94. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-94.
8
Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery - Is there any consensus?择期手术中腹壁关闭的当前实践——是否存在共识?
BMC Surg. 2009 May 15;9:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-9-8.
9
Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor.低位前切除术后的转流造口:更多支持的理由。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Mar;52(3):412-8. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318197e1b1.
10
Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials.临床试验荟萃分析中缺失结局数据的插补方法。
Clin Trials. 2008;5(3):225-39. doi: 10.1177/1740774508091600.