• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断性试验的系统评价:用于诊断准确性研究的文献检索过滤器(“临床问题”)效果良好。

Diagnostic test systematic reviews: bibliographic search filters ("Clinical Queries") for diagnostic accuracy studies perform well.

作者信息

Kastner Monika, Wilczynski Nancy L, McKibbon Ann K, Garg Amit X, Haynes R Brian

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Health Information Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):974-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.11.006. Epub 2009 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.11.006
PMID:19230607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2737707/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews of health care topics are valuable summaries of all pertinent studies on focused questions. However, finding all relevant primary studies for systematic reviews remains challenging.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the performance of the Clinical Queries sensitive search filter for diagnostic accuracy studies for retrieving studies for systematic reviews.

METHODS

We compared the yield of the sensitive Clinical Queries diagnosis search filter for MEDLINE and EMBASE to retrieve studies in diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews reported in ACP Journal Club in 2006.

RESULTS

Twelve of 22 diagnostic accuracy reviews (452 included studies) met the inclusion criteria. After excluding 11 studies not in MEDLINE or EMBASE, 95% of articles (417 of 441) were captured by the sensitive Clinical Queries diagnosis search filter (MEDLINE and EMBASE combined). Of 24 studies not retrieved by the filter, 22 were not diagnostic accuracy studies. Reanalysis of the Clinical Queries filter without these 22 nondiagnosis articles increased its performance to 99% (417 of 419). We found no substantive impact of the two articles missed by the Clinical Queries filter on the conclusions of the systematic reviews in which they were cited.

CONCLUSION

The sensitive Clinical Queries diagnostic search filter captured 99% of articles and 100% of substantive articles indexed in MEDLINE and EMBASE in diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews.

摘要

背景

对医疗保健主题进行系统评价是对聚焦问题的所有相关研究的有价值总结。然而,为系统评价找到所有相关的原始研究仍然具有挑战性。

目的

确定临床问题敏感搜索过滤器在检索用于系统评价的诊断准确性研究方面的性能。

方法

我们比较了MEDLINE和EMBASE的敏感临床问题诊断搜索过滤器在检索2006年《美国内科医师学会杂志俱乐部》报道的诊断准确性系统评价中的研究时的产出。

结果

22项诊断准确性评价中的12项(包括452项研究)符合纳入标准。在排除11项不在MEDLINE或EMBASE中的研究后,95%的文章(441篇中的417篇)被敏感临床问题诊断搜索过滤器(MEDLINE和EMBASE合并)捕获。在过滤器未检索到的24项研究中,22项不是诊断准确性研究。对不包括这22篇非诊断性文章的临床问题过滤器进行重新分析,其性能提高到99%(419篇中的417篇)。我们发现临床问题过滤器遗漏的两篇文章对它们被引用的系统评价的结论没有实质性影响。

结论

在诊断准确性系统评价中,敏感临床问题诊断搜索过滤器捕获了MEDLINE和EMBASE中索引的99%的文章和100%的实质性文章。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic test systematic reviews: bibliographic search filters ("Clinical Queries") for diagnostic accuracy studies perform well.诊断性试验的系统评价:用于诊断准确性研究的文献检索过滤器(“临床问题”)效果良好。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):974-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.11.006. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
2
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.在MEDLINE和EMBASE中识别诊断准确性研究的检索策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3.
3
Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase.在MEDLINE和Embase中识别观察性研究的检索策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 12;3(3):MR000041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000041.pub2.
4
Search strategies (filters) to identify systematic reviews in MEDLINE and Embase.检索策略(筛选条件)以识别 MEDLINE 和 Embase 中的系统评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 8;9(9):MR000054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000054.pub2.
5
Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy.利用系统评价的激增:一种高效的医学期刊数据库检索策略
Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Jul-Aug;4(4):157-62.
6
Development and validation of search filters to retrieve medication discontinuation articles in Medline and Embase.检索Medline和Embase中药物停用文章的检索过滤器的开发与验证
Health Info Libr J. 2024 Jun;41(2):156-165. doi: 10.1111/hir.12516. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
7
The efficiency of database searches for creating systematic reviews was improved by search filters.数据库搜索的效率通过搜索过滤器得到了提高,从而可以创建系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;95:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
8
Assessing the performance of methodological search filters to improve the efficiency of evidence information retrieval: five literature reviews and a qualitative study.评估方法学检索过滤器的性能以提高证据信息检索的效率:五项文献综述和一项定性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Nov;21(69):1-148. doi: 10.3310/hta21690.
9
Sensitive Clinical Queries retrieved relevant systematic reviews as well as primary studies: an analytic survey.敏感临床问题检索到相关的系统评价和原始研究:分析调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
10
The NICE UK geographic search filters for MEDLINE and Embase (Ovid): Post-development study to further evaluate precision and number-needed-to-read when retrieving UK evidence.英国 NICE 的 MEDLINE 和 Embase(Ovid)地理搜索筛选器:开发后研究,以进一步评估检索英国证据时的精度和所需阅读次数。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Sep;11(5):669-677. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1431. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and evaluation of a search filter to identify prognostic factor studies in Ovid MEDLINE.开发和评估 Ovid MEDLINE 中识别预后因素研究的检索过滤器。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 10;22(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01595-9.
2
The yield and usefulness of PAIN and PubMed databases for accessing research evidence on pain management: a randomized crossover trial.用于获取疼痛管理研究证据的PAIN数据库和PubMed数据库的产出及实用性:一项随机交叉试验
Arch Physiother. 2021 Apr 1;11(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00100-7.
3
Optimizing a literature surveillance strategy to retrieve sound overall prognosis and risk assessment model papers.优化文献监测策略,以检索全面预后和风险评估模型论文。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):766-771. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa232.
4
Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to perform a high-quality literature search.外科文献用户指南:如何进行高质量的文献检索。
Can J Surg. 2015 Oct;58(5):349-58. doi: 10.1503/cjs.017314.
5
Increased workload for systematic review literature searches of diagnostic tests compared with treatments: challenges and opportunities.与治疗相比,诊断测试系统评价文献检索的工作量增加:挑战与机遇。
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 May 27;2(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3037.
6
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.在MEDLINE和EMBASE中识别诊断准确性研究的检索策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3.
7
Instruments for assessing the risk of falls in acute hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估急性住院患者跌倒风险的工具:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 2;13:122. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-122.
8
Gender differences in the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a bivariate meta-analysis.SPECT 心肌灌注成像诊断准确性的性别差异:双变量荟萃分析。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Feb;20(1):53-63. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9646-2. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
9
The Association between Databases for Indexing Studies Intended for an Exercise Meta-Analysis of Arthritis Randomized Controlled Trials.用于关节炎随机对照试验运动荟萃分析的索引研究数据库之间的关联。
Arthritis. 2012;2012:624830. doi: 10.1155/2012/624830. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
10
Sensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviews.15种PubMed检索策略针对经全面系统评价评定的临床问题的敏感性和预测价值。
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 12;14(3):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Do published search filters to identify diagnostic test accuracy studies perform adequately?已发表的用于识别诊断试验准确性研究的检索过滤器效果如何?
Health Info Libr J. 2007 Sep;24(3):188-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00735.x.
2
Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency.检索策略中的错误按照类型和频率进行识别。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1057-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.007. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
3
Limited value of alarm features in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.警报特征在上消化道恶性肿瘤诊断中的有限价值:系统评价与荟萃分析
Gastroenterology. 2006 Aug;131(2):390-401; quiz 659-60. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.04.029.
4
Systematic review: the use of serology to exclude or diagnose coeliac disease (a comparison of the endomysial and tissue transglutaminase antibody tests).系统评价:血清学检测在排除或诊断乳糜泻中的应用(肌内膜抗体与组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体检测的比较)
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jul 1;24(1):47-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02967.x.
5
Accuracy of monoclonal stool antigen test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的单克隆粪便抗原检测的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug;101(8):1921-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00668.x. Epub 2006 Jun 16.
6
Accuracy of B-type natriuretic peptide tests to exclude congestive heart failure: systematic review of test accuracy studies.B型利钠肽检测用于排除充血性心力衰竭的准确性:检测准确性研究的系统评价
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1073-80. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1073.
7
Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis.非侵入性成像与动脉内血管造影术在有症状颈动脉狭窄诊断中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2006 May 6;367(9521):1503-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68650-9.
8
Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests.腰椎管狭窄症的诊断:诊断试验准确性的系统评价
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 1;31(10):1168-76. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000216463.32136.7b.
9
Practice Parameter: evaluation and treatment of depression, psychosis, and dementia in Parkinson disease (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.实践参数:帕金森病抑郁、精神病和痴呆的评估与治疗(循证综述):美国神经病学学会质量标准小组委员会报告
Neurology. 2006 Apr 11;66(7):996-1002. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000215428.46057.3d.
10
Practice Parameter: diagnosis and prognosis of new onset Parkinson disease (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.实践参数:新发帕金森病的诊断与预后(循证综述)[已退休]:美国神经病学学会质量标准小组委员会报告
Neurology. 2006 Apr 11;66(7):968-75. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000215437.80053.d0.