• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的癌症筛查计划作为初级预防干预的教学时刻。文献回顾。

Population based cancer screening programmes as a teachable moment for primary prevention interventions. A review of the literature.

机构信息

Epidemiologia dei Tumori II, AOU S Giovanni Battista - CPO Piemonte Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2012 May 8;2:45. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00045. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2012.00045
PMID:22649789
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3355877/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and smoking are key risk factors for the major non-communicable diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes. The screening procedure may represent an ideal setting for promoting healthy lifestyles as it represents a time when subjects are probably more inclined to consider a relationship between their own habits and their effects on health. The aim of this study is to review available evidence concerning interventions combining screening and primary prevention interventions, aimed at promoting the adoption of healthy lifestyles.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane library electronic databases for intervention studies of primary prevention interventions implemented in the context of established screening programmes, or of pilot screening projects, where the study design included a comparison group.

RESULTS

Comprehensive interventions are acceptable for asymptomatic subjects targeted for cancer screening, can result in improvements and may be cost-effective. A positive impact of these interventions in favoring the adoption of cancer protective dietary behaviors was observed in all studies. Conflicting results were instead reported with respect to physical activity, while no impact could be observed for interventions aimed to favor smoking cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

The retrieved studies suggest that the screening setting may offer valuable opportunities to provide credible, potentially persuasive life style advice, reaching a wide audience. A multiple risk factor approach may maximize the benefit of behavioral change, as the same health related habits are associated not only with cancers targeted by screening interventions, but also with other cancers, coronary artery disease, and other chronic conditions, while unhealthy behaviors may be mutually reinforcing. In order to cover a maximum number of possibilities, health education programmes should include multiple strategies, integrating and combining models of individual, social, and environmental change.

摘要

背景与目的

不健康的饮食、缺乏身体活动和吸烟是癌症、心血管疾病和糖尿病等主要非传染性疾病的关键风险因素。筛查程序可能代表促进健康生活方式的理想环境,因为它代表了一个受试者可能更倾向于考虑自己的习惯与健康之间关系的时刻。本研究的目的是回顾关于将筛查与初级预防干预相结合的干预措施的现有证据,旨在促进健康生活方式的采用。

方法

我们在 MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆电子数据库中搜索了在既定筛查计划背景下或试点筛查项目中实施的初级预防干预措施的干预研究,其中研究设计包括对照组。

结果

全面的干预措施对于针对癌症筛查的无症状受试者是可以接受的,可以改善情况,并且可能具有成本效益。所有研究都观察到这些干预措施对促进癌症保护饮食行为的采用具有积极影响。然而,对于身体活动,报告的结果则存在冲突,而对于旨在促进戒烟的干预措施,则没有观察到影响。

结论

检索到的研究表明,筛查环境可能为提供可信、有潜力的生活方式建议提供有价值的机会,覆盖广泛的受众。多危险因素方法可以最大限度地提高行为改变的益处,因为相同的健康相关习惯不仅与筛查干预针对的癌症有关,而且与其他癌症、冠心病和其他慢性疾病有关,而不健康的行为可能相互加强。为了涵盖最大数量的可能性,健康教育计划应包括多种策略,整合和结合个人、社会和环境变化的模型。

相似文献

1
Population based cancer screening programmes as a teachable moment for primary prevention interventions. A review of the literature.基于人群的癌症筛查计划作为初级预防干预的教学时刻。文献回顾。
Front Oncol. 2012 May 8;2:45. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00045. eCollection 2012.
2
[Integrating cancer screening and primary prevention: a review].[整合癌症筛查与一级预防:综述]
Epidemiol Prev. 2015 Sep-Dec;39(5-6):360-5.
3
4
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.流行病学方法与应用概述:观察性研究设计的优势与局限性。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.526838.
8
9
Effectiveness of programmes as part of primary prevention demonstrated on the example of cardiovascular diseases and the metabolic syndrome.以心血管疾病和代谢综合征为例,说明作为一级预防一部分的项目的有效性。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Apr 1;7:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/hta000093.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Colorectal Cancer Awareness and Preventive Lifestyle Practices in the United Arab Emirates: A Comparative Study of Risk Groups.评估阿拉伯联合酋长国的结直肠癌认知度和预防性生活方式实践:风险群体的比较研究。
J Community Health. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-025-01475-5.
2
The Impact of Preoperative and Postoperative Nutritional Interventions on Treatment Outcomes and Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients-A Comprehensive Review.术前和术后营养干预对结直肠癌患者治疗结局和生活质量的影响——全面综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 27;60(10):1587. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101587.
3
Short-term impact of cardiovascular screening by traditional risk assessment or coronary artery calcium score on health-related quality of life: the ROBINSCA trial.传统风险评估或冠状动脉钙化评分进行心血管筛查对健康相关生活质量的短期影响:ROBINSCA试验
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Sep 23;4(5):oeae080. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae080. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
A Randomized Control Trial of a Digital Health Tool for Safer Firearm and Medication Storage for Patients with Suicide Risk.一项针对有自杀风险患者的更安全的枪支和药物存储数字健康工具的随机对照试验。
Prev Sci. 2024 Feb;25(2):358-368. doi: 10.1007/s11121-024-01641-6. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
5
Promoting healthy lifestyle habits among participants in cancer screening programs: Results of the randomized controlled Sti.Vi study.在癌症筛查项目参与者中推广健康的生活方式习惯:随机对照Sti.Vi研究的结果。
J Public Health Res. 2022 Jul 12;11(3):22799036221106542. doi: 10.1177/22799036221106542. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors in Palestine: Where Do We Stand?巴勒斯坦人群对结直肠癌危险因素的认知:我们处于何种水平?
JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Jun;8:e2200070. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00070.
7
Stop smoking advice by practice assistants after routine cervical screening in general practice: A qualitative exploration of potential barriers and enablers.常规宫颈筛查后由基层医疗中的实践助理提供戒烟建议:对潜在障碍和促进因素的定性探讨。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):56-65. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2053105.
8
Smoking cessation strategy in the national cervical cancer screening program (SUCCESS): study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised trial and process evaluation in Dutch general practice.国家宫颈癌筛查计划(SUCCESS)中的戒烟策略:荷兰普通实践中一项实用型整群随机试验和过程评估的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 4;12(4):e055812. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055812.
9
A Review of Modifiable Risk Factors in Young Women for the Prevention of Breast Cancer.年轻女性乳腺癌预防中可改变风险因素的综述
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2021 Apr 13;13:241-257. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S268401. eCollection 2021.
10
Iranian women's psychological responses to positive HPV test result: a qualitative study.伊朗女性 HPV 检测阳性结果的心理反应:一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Mar 26;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01272-x.

本文引用的文献

1
The Pap smear screening as an occasion for smoking cessation and physical activity counselling: baseline characteristics of women involved in the SPRINT randomized controlled trial.巴氏涂片筛查作为戒烟和身体活动咨询的机会:参与 SPRINT 随机对照试验的女性的基线特征。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Dec 7;11:906. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-906.
2
Understanding the potential and challenges of adenoma treatment as a prevention opportunity: insights from the BeWEL formative study.腺瘤治疗作为预防机会的潜力和挑战的理解:BeWEL 形成性研究的见解。
Prev Med. 2012 Jan;54(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.10.017. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
3
The effectiveness of a computer-tailored smoking cessation intervention for participants in lung cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.计算机定制戒烟干预对肺癌筛查参与者的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Lung Cancer. 2012 May;76(2):204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
4
Study protocol for BeWEL: the impact of a BodyWEight and physicaL activity intervention on adults at risk of developing colorectal adenomas.BeWEL 研究方案:一项针对有结直肠腺瘤发病风险的成年人的体重管理和身体活动干预的影响研究。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Mar 25;11:184. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-184.
5
The impact of individually-tailored lifestyle advice in the colorectal cancer screening context: a randomised pilot study in North-West London.在结直肠癌筛查背景下提供个体化生活方式建议的影响:一项在伦敦西北部的随机试点研究。
Prev Med. 2010 Dec;51(6):505-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
6
Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?参加筛查是否会无意间影响生活方式行为,从而影响与生活方式相关的发病率?
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;24(4):465-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.001.
7
Bowel health to better health: a minimal contact lifestyle intervention for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer.肠道健康,健康更好:一种针对结直肠癌高危人群的低接触生活方式干预。
Br J Nutr. 2009 Dec;102(11):1541-6. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509990808. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
8
Teachable moments for health behavior change: a concept analysis.可教时刻促进健康行为改变:概念分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jul;76(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.002. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
9
Psychologic intervention improves survival for breast cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial.心理干预可提高乳腺癌患者的生存率:一项随机临床试验。
Cancer. 2008 Dec 15;113(12):3450-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23969.
10
A 9-year follow-up study of participants and nonparticipants in sigmoidoscopy screening: importance of self-selection.一项针对乙状结肠镜筛查参与者和非参与者的9年随访研究:自我选择的重要性。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 May;17(5):1163-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2764.