School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Aug;87(8):791-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 May 31.
The transmission of bacteria is more likely to occur from wet skin than from dry skin; therefore, the proper drying of hands after washing should be an integral part of the hand hygiene process in health care. This article systematically reviews the research on the hygienic efficacy of different hand-drying methods. A literature search was conducted in April 2011 using the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Search terms used were hand dryer and hand drying. The search was limited to articles published in English from January 1970 through March 2011. Twelve studies were included in the review. Hand-drying effectiveness includes the speed of drying, degree of dryness, effective removal of bacteria, and prevention of cross-contamination. This review found little agreement regarding the relative effectiveness of electric air dryers. However, most studies suggest that paper towels can dry hands efficiently, remove bacteria effectively, and cause less contamination of the washroom environment. From a hygiene viewpoint, paper towels are superior to electric air dryers. Paper towels should be recommended in locations where hygiene is paramount, such as hospitals and clinics.
细菌的传播更可能发生在潮湿的皮肤上,而不是干燥的皮肤上;因此,在卫生保健中,洗手后正确擦干双手应该是手部卫生过程的一个组成部分。本文系统地综述了不同手干燥方法的卫生效果的研究。2011 年 4 月,使用电子数据库 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 进行了文献检索。使用的检索词是 hand dryer 和 hand drying。检索仅限于 1970 年 1 月至 2011 年 3 月期间以英文发表的文章。本综述共纳入了 12 项研究。手干燥效果包括干燥速度、干燥程度、有效去除细菌和防止交叉污染。本综述发现,电动干手器的相对效果几乎没有一致意见。然而,大多数研究表明,纸巾可以有效地擦干双手,有效去除细菌,并且对洗手间环境的污染较小。从卫生角度来看,纸巾优于电动干手器。纸巾应在卫生至关重要的地方,如医院和诊所推荐使用。