• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Qualitative evaluation of project P.A.T.H.S.: an integration of findings based on program participants.“P.A.T.H.S. 项目”的质性评估：基于项目参与者的综合研究结果
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:528483. doi: 10.1100/2012/528483. Epub 2012 May 15.
2
Qualitative evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: an integration of findings based on program implementers.“P.A.T.H.S. 项目”的定性评估：基于项目实施者的综合研究结果
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:591816. doi: 10.1100/2012/591816. Epub 2012 May 15.
3
Qualitative evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S. based on the perceptions of the program participants.基于项目参与者认知的“P.A.T.H.S. 项目”定性评估
ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Nov 16;6:2254-63. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.354.
4
Qualitative evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on focus groups with student participants.“P.A.T.H.S. 项目”的定性评估：基于与学生参与者焦点小组讨论的结果
ScientificWorldJournal. 2009 Aug 1;9:691-703. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2009.59.
5
Focus group evaluation from the perspective of program implementers: findings based on the secondary 2 program.从项目实施者角度进行的焦点小组评估：基于初中二年级项目的研究结果
ScientificWorldJournal. 2009 Oct 1;9:992-1002. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2009.117.
6
Qualitative evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S. based on junior secondary school students in Hong Kong.基于香港初中生的“成长的天空”计划质性评估
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;22(4):511-25. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2010.22.4.511.
7
Qualitative evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on focus groups with student participants.“P.A.T.H.S. 项目”的质性评估：基于与学生参与者焦点小组讨论的结果
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):449-62. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2008.20.4.449.
8
Qualitative evaluation of Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: focus groups based on Secondary 3 program implementers.香港“成长的天空”计划的质性评估：基于中三课程实施者的焦点小组研究
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2012 Jan 18;24(3):245-52. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2012.035.
9
Program implementers' evaluation of Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: a study based on different cohorts.项目实施者对香港“成长的天空”计划的评估：一项基于不同队列的研究。
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2012 Sep 7;24(3):213-22. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2012.032.
10
Interim evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on different datasets.“P.A.T.H.S. 项目的中期评估：基于不同数据集的结果”
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:132826. doi: 10.1100/2012/132826. Epub 2012 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantitative and qualitative approaches in the study of poverty and adolescent development: separation or integration?贫困与青少年发展研究中的定量与定性方法：分离还是整合？
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2011;23(2):115-21. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2011.020.
2
Prevention of adolescent problem behavior: longitudinal impact of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong.预防青少年问题行为：香港“成长的天空”计划的纵向影响。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2011 Mar 7;11:546-67. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2011.33.
3
Longitudinal data analyses using linear mixed models in SPSS: concepts, procedures and illustrations.使用SPSS中的线性混合模型进行纵向数据分析：概念、步骤与示例
ScientificWorldJournal. 2011 Jan 5;11:42-76. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2011.2.
4
Secondary data analyses of subjective outcome evaluation findings of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong.香港“成长的天空”计划主观成果评估结果的二次数据分析
ScientificWorldJournal. 2010 Nov 4;10:2101-11. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2010.177.
5
Effectiveness of the Tier 1 Program of Project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on three years of program implementation.“P.A.T.H.S. 项目”一级计划的成效：基于三年项目实施情况的研究结果
ScientificWorldJournal. 2010 Aug 3;10:1509-19. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2010.122.
6
Subjective outcome evaluation of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong: profiles and correlates.香港一项积极青少年发展计划的主观结果评估：概况与关联因素
ScientificWorldJournal. 2010 Feb 12;10:192-200. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2010.2.
7
Qualitative evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on focus groups with student participants.“P.A.T.H.S. 项目”的质性评估：基于与学生参与者焦点小组讨论的结果
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):449-62. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2008.20.4.449.
8
Evaluation of project P.A.T.H.S. (Secondary 1 Program) by the program participants: findings based on the Full Implementation Phase.项目参与者对“成长阶梯”（中学一年级课程）的评估：基于全面实施阶段的结果
Adolescence. 2008 Winter;43(172):807-22.
9
Qualitative evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S. based on the perceptions of the program participants.基于项目参与者认知的“P.A.T.H.S. 项目”定性评估
ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Nov 16;6:2254-63. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.354.
10
Focus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research.焦点小组作为一种研究方法：对其在护理研究中应用某些方面的批判。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Mar;33(6):798-805. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01720.x.

“P.A.T.H.S. 项目”的质性评估：基于项目参与者的综合研究结果

Qualitative evaluation of project P.A.T.H.S.: an integration of findings based on program participants.

作者信息

Shek Daniel T L, Sun Rachel C F

机构信息

Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

出版信息

ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:528483. doi: 10.1100/2012/528483. Epub 2012 May 15.

DOI:10.1100/2012/528483
PMID:22666134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3362027/
Abstract

An integration of the qualitative evaluation findings collected in different cohorts of students who participated in Project P.A.T.H.S. (Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes) (n = 252 students in 29 focus groups) was carried out. With specific focus on how the informants described the program, results showed that the descriptions were mainly positive in nature, suggesting that the program was well received by the program participants. When the informants were invited to name three metaphors that could stand for the program, positive metaphors were commonly used. Beneficial effects of the program in different psychosocial domains were also voiced by the program participants. The qualitative findings integrated in this paper provide further support for the effectiveness of the Tier 1 Program of Project P.A.T.H.S. in promoting holistic development in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong.

摘要

对参与“成长的阶梯”计划（通过全方位社会计划进行积极青少年培训）的不同学生群体收集的定性评估结果进行了整合（29个焦点小组中的252名学生）。特别关注受访者如何描述该计划，结果表明这些描述总体上是积极的，这表明该计划受到了参与者的好评。当邀请受访者说出三个可以代表该计划的隐喻时，他们普遍使用了积极的隐喻。计划参与者也提到了该计划在不同心理社会领域的有益效果。本文整合的定性研究结果为“成长的阶梯”计划一级项目在促进香港中国青少年全面发展方面的有效性提供了进一步支持。