School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Brain. 2012 Jul;135(Pt 7):2202-14. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws142. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
Fluency tasks have been widely used to tap the voluntary generation of responses. The anatomical correlates of fluency tasks and their sensitivity and specificity have been hotly debated. However, investigation of the cognitive processes involved in voluntary generation of responses and whether generation is supported by a common, general process (e.g. fluid intelligence) or specific cognitive processes underpinned by particular frontal regions has rarely been addressed. This study investigates a range of verbal and non-verbal fluency tasks in patients with unselected focal frontal (n=47) and posterior (n=20) lesions. Patients and controls (n=35) matched for education, age and sex were administered fluency tasks including word (phonemic/semantic), design, gesture and ideational fluency as well as background cognitive tests. Lesions were analysed by standard anterior/posterior and left/right frontal subdivisions as well as a finer-grained frontal localization method. Thus, patients with right and left lateral lesions were compared to patients with superior medial lesions. The results show that all eight fluency tasks are sensitive to frontal lobe damage although only the phonemic word and design fluency tasks were specific to the frontal region. Superior medial patients were the only group to be impaired on all eight fluency tasks, relative to controls, consistent with an energization deficit. The most marked fluency deficits for lateral patients were along material specific lines (i.e. left-phonemic and right-design). Phonemic word fluency that requires greater selection was most severely impaired following left inferior frontal damage. Overall, our results support the notion that frontal functions comprise a set of specialized cognitive processes, supported by distinct frontal regions.
流畅性任务被广泛用于挖掘自愿反应的生成。流畅性任务的解剖学相关性及其敏感性和特异性一直存在激烈争论。然而,对于涉及自愿生成反应的认知过程的研究,以及生成是否由一个共同的、一般的过程(例如流体智力)或特定的认知过程支持,这些过程由特定的额叶区域支撑,很少被涉及。本研究调查了一系列未经选择的局灶性额叶(n=47)和后叶(n=20)病变患者的言语和非言语流畅性任务。患者和对照组(n=35)按教育、年龄和性别匹配,接受了包括单词(语音/语义)、设计、手势和意念流畅性以及背景认知测试在内的流畅性任务。通过标准的前/后和左/右额叶细分以及更精细的额叶定位方法分析病变。因此,将右侧和左侧外侧病变的患者与上内侧病变的患者进行了比较。结果表明,所有八项流畅性任务都对额叶损伤敏感,尽管只有语音单词和设计流畅性任务是额叶区域特有的。与对照组相比,只有上内侧患者在所有八项流畅性任务中都受到损害,这与能量不足一致。外侧患者最明显的流畅性缺陷是沿着特定材料的缺陷(即左语音和右设计)。需要更大选择的语音单词流畅性在左下额叶损伤后受到最严重的损害。总体而言,我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即额叶功能由一组特定的认知过程组成,由特定的额叶区域支持。