Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Brain. 2010 Jan;133(Pt 1):234-47. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp269. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
Many tests of specific 'executive functions' show deficits after frontal lobe lesions. These deficits appear on a background of reduced fluid intelligence, best measured with tests of novel problem solving. For a range of specific executive tests, we ask how far frontal deficits can be explained by a general fluid intelligence loss. For some widely used tests, e.g. Wisconsin Card Sorting, we find that fluid intelligence entirely explains frontal deficits. When patients and controls are matched on fluid intelligence, no further frontal deficit remains. For these tasks too, deficits are unrelated to lesion location within the frontal lobe. A second group of tasks, including tests of both cognitive (e.g. Hotel, Proverbs) and social (Faux Pas) function, shows a different pattern. Deficits are not fully explained by fluid intelligence and the data suggest association with lesions in the right anterior frontal cortex. Understanding of frontal lobe deficits may be clarified by separating reduced fluid intelligence, important in most or all tasks, from other more specific impairments and their associated regions of damage.
许多针对特定“执行功能”的测试显示,额叶损伤后会出现缺陷。这些缺陷出现在流体智力下降的背景下,流体智力最好通过新颖的解决问题测试来衡量。对于一系列特定的执行功能测试,我们要问的是,一般的流体智力丧失能在多大程度上解释额叶缺陷。对于威斯康星卡片分类等一些广泛使用的测试,我们发现流体智力完全可以解释额叶缺陷。当患者和对照组在流体智力上相匹配时,就不再存在进一步的额叶缺陷。对于这些任务,缺陷与额叶内的损伤位置无关。另一组任务,包括认知(例如,酒店、谚语)和社会(失态)功能的测试,表现出不同的模式。流体智力并不能完全解释缺陷,数据表明,与右前额叶皮质的损伤有关。通过将在大多数或所有任务中都很重要的流体智力降低与其他更具体的损伤及其相关的损伤区域分开,可以更清楚地理解额叶缺陷。