• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量与标准剂量坦索罗辛和阿夫唑嗪在输尿管下段结石药物排石治疗中的比较及疗效:前瞻性、随机、对照研究

Comparison and efficacy of low-dose and standard-dose tamsulosin and alfuzosin in medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteral calculi: prospective, randomized, comparative study.

作者信息

Cha Woo Heon, Choi Jae Duck, Kim Ki Ho, Seo Young Jin, Lee Kyungseop

机构信息

Department of Urology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Urol. 2012 May;53(5):349-54. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.5.349. Epub 2012 May 18.

DOI:10.4111/kju.2012.53.5.349
PMID:22670195
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3364475/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Typically in Korea, for a standard dose (0.4 mg) of tamsulosin, two low doses (0.2 mg) are administered. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of tamsulosin (0.2 mg and 0.4 mg) and alfuzosin (10 mg) in the treatment of lower ureteral stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 141 patients presenting with a single 4- to 10-mm sized lower ureteral stone were randomly assigned to 4 groups. Patients in group 1 (n=41) and group 2 (n=30) received an oral dose of 0.2 mg tamsulosin once and twice daily, respectively, and patients in group 3 (n=36) received a daily oral dose of 10 mg alfuzosin. Patients in group 4 (n=34) received trospium chloride only. The spontaneous passage of stones, the stone expulsion time, and adverse effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient background, including age, sex, BMI, stone size, stone side, and symptom duration. The spontaneous stone passage rate through the ureter was higher and the stone expulsion time was faster in groups 1, 2, and 3 than in group 4. There were no statistically different changes in groups 1, 2, and 3. The adverse effects observed in all groups were comparable and were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Tamsulosin at 0.2 mg and 0.4 mg and alfuzosin (10 mg) proved to be safe and effective. A first cycle of medical expulsive therapy with tamsulosin 0.2 mg could be considered as an option in the management of single lower ureteral stone.

摘要

目的

在韩国,通常对于坦索罗辛的标准剂量(0.4毫克),会给予两次低剂量(0.2毫克)。本研究的目的是评估和比较坦索罗辛(0.2毫克和0.4毫克)与阿夫唑嗪(10毫克)治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效。

材料与方法

总共141例患有单个4至10毫米大小输尿管下段结石的患者被随机分为4组。第1组(n = 41)和第2组(n = 30)的患者分别每日口服一次和两次0.2毫克坦索罗辛,第3组(n = 36)的患者每日口服10毫克阿夫唑嗪。第4组(n = 34)的患者仅接受曲司氯铵治疗。评估结石的自然排出情况、结石排出时间及不良反应。

结果

患者背景,包括年龄、性别、体重指数、结石大小、结石部位及症状持续时间,均无显著差异。第1、2和3组输尿管结石的自然排出率高于第4组,且结石排出时间更快。第1、2和3组之间无统计学上的差异变化。所有组观察到的不良反应相当且轻微。

结论

0.2毫克和0.4毫克的坦索罗辛以及阿夫唑嗪(10毫克)被证明是安全有效的。对于单个输尿管下段结石的治疗,可考虑将0.2毫克坦索罗辛作为药物排石治疗的首选方案。

相似文献

1
Comparison and efficacy of low-dose and standard-dose tamsulosin and alfuzosin in medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteral calculi: prospective, randomized, comparative study.低剂量与标准剂量坦索罗辛和阿夫唑嗪在输尿管下段结石药物排石治疗中的比较及疗效:前瞻性、随机、对照研究
Korean J Urol. 2012 May;53(5):349-54. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.5.349. Epub 2012 May 18.
2
Tamsulosin versus Alfuzosin in the Treatment of Patients with Distal Ureteral Stones: Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study.坦索罗辛与阿夫唑嗪治疗远端输尿管结石患者的前瞻性、随机、对照研究
Korean J Urol. 2010 Mar;51(3):193-7. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.3.193. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Alfuzosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿夫唑嗪作为输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0134589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134589. eCollection 2015.
4
Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin vs. alfuzosin as medical expulsive therapy for ureteric stones.坦索罗辛与阿夫唑嗪作为输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效及安全性比较
Arab J Urol. 2013 Jun;11(2):142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
5
To compare the efficacy of tamsulosin and alfuzosin as medical expulsive therapy for ureteric stones.比较坦索罗辛和阿夫唑嗪作为输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效。
Avicenna J Med. 2017 Jul-Sep;7(3):115-120. doi: 10.4103/ajm.AJM_87_16.
6
Prospective randomized trial comparing efficacy of alfuzosin and tamsulosin in management of lower ureteral stones.比较阿夫唑嗪和坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石疗效的前瞻性随机试验。
Urology. 2009 Apr;73(4):706-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.013. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
7
Tadalafil versus alpha blockers (alfuzosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin and silodosin) as medical expulsive therapy for < 10 mm distal and proximal ureteral stones.他达拉非与α受体阻滞剂(阿夫唑嗪、多沙唑嗪、坦索罗辛和西洛多辛)作为<10毫米远端和近端输尿管结石的药物排石疗法。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018 Jun 30;90(2):117-122. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.2.117.
8
Alfuzosin treatment improves the rate and time for stone expulsion in patients with distal uretral stones: a prospective randomized controlled study.阿夫唑嗪治疗可提高远端输尿管结石患者的结石排出率及缩短结石排出时间:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Pharmacotherapy. 2015 May;35(5):470-6. doi: 10.1002/phar.1593.
9
Efficacy of tamsulosin versus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy on stone expulsion in patients with distal ureteral stones: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.坦索罗辛与他达拉非作为排石疗法治疗输尿管下段结石患者排石效果的比较:一项随机、双盲的临床试验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Sep-Oct;47(5):982-988. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1007.
10
Comparison of three most frequently used alpha blocker agents in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi, result of a retrospective observational study.三种最常用的α受体阻滞剂在远端输尿管结石药物排石治疗中的比较:一项回顾性观察研究结果
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018 Mar 31;90(1):25-28. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.1.25.

引用本文的文献

1
Summary of the clinical practice guideline for the management of urinary stones, third edition.《尿路结石管理临床实践指南》第三版总结
Int J Urol. 2025 May;32(5):462-474. doi: 10.1111/iju.70004. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
Comparison of efficacy of three commonly used alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.三种常用α受体阻滞剂作为医学排石疗法治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Sep-Oct;48(5):742-759. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0548.
3
A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Dose Escalation Therapy in Male Patients With Nocturia Refractory to 0.2-mg Tamsulosin Monotherapy.一项针对坦索罗辛 0.2mg 单药治疗无效的男性夜尿症患者进行剂量递增疗法的前瞻性、多中心、开放标签研究。
Int Neurourol J. 2019 Dec;23(4):294-301. doi: 10.5213/inj.1938076.038. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
4
Alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones.α受体阻滞剂作为输尿管结石的药物排石疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD008509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008509.pub3.
5
To compare the efficacy of tamsulosin and alfuzosin as medical expulsive therapy for ureteric stones.比较坦索罗辛和阿夫唑嗪作为输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效。
Avicenna J Med. 2017 Jul-Sep;7(3):115-120. doi: 10.4103/ajm.AJM_87_16.
6
Comparative efficacy of tamsulosin versus nifedipine for distal ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis.坦索罗辛与硝苯地平治疗远端输尿管结石的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Mar 29;10:1257-65. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S99330. eCollection 2016.
7
Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin vs. alfuzosin as medical expulsive therapy for ureteric stones.坦索罗辛与阿夫唑嗪作为输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效及安全性比较
Arab J Urol. 2013 Jun;11(2):142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Alfuzosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿夫唑嗪作为输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0134589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134589. eCollection 2015.
9
The beneficial effect of alpha-blockers for ureteral stent-related discomfort: systematic review and network meta-analysis for alfuzosin versus tamsulosin versus placebo.α受体阻滞剂对输尿管支架相关不适的有益作用:阿夫唑嗪与坦索罗辛对比安慰剂的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
BMC Urol. 2015 Jun 24;15:55. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0050-5.
10
Efficacy of alfuzosin after shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of ureteral calculi.阿夫唑嗪在冲击波碎石术后治疗输尿管结石的疗效。
Korean J Urol. 2013 Feb;54(2):106-10. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.2.106. Epub 2013 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of doxazosin in the management of lower ureteral stones in male and female patients.多沙唑嗪在男性和女性患者下尿路结石治疗中的有效性。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Sep;43(3):645-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9867-8. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
2
Tamsulosin versus Alfuzosin in the Treatment of Patients with Distal Ureteral Stones: Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study.坦索罗辛与阿夫唑嗪治疗远端输尿管结石患者的前瞻性、随机、对照研究
Korean J Urol. 2010 Mar;51(3):193-7. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.3.193. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
3
Efficacy of low dose tamsulosin in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones in Japanese male patients: a randomized controlled study.低剂量坦索罗辛在日本男性患者药物排石治疗输尿管结石中的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
Int J Urol. 2010 May;17(5):462-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02499.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
4
Efficacy of tamsulosin in the management of lower ureteral stones: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of 100 patients.坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效:100 例患者随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.073.
5
Recommending medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric calculi: a step back?推荐对远端输尿管结石进行药物排石治疗:是一种倒退吗?
Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):413-5; discussion 416-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.044. Epub 2009 May 3.
6
Is there a role for tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones of 7 mm or less? Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.坦索罗辛在治疗7毫米及以下远端输尿管结石中是否有作用?一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.076. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
7
Prospective randomized trial comparing efficacy of alfuzosin and tamsulosin in management of lower ureteral stones.比较阿夫唑嗪和坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石疗效的前瞻性随机试验。
Urology. 2009 Apr;73(4):706-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.013. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
8
Effectiveness of low-dose and standard-dose tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteric stones: a randomized controlled study.低剂量与标准剂量坦索罗辛治疗远端输尿管结石的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
J Int Med Res. 2008 May-Jun;36(3):529-36. doi: 10.1177/147323000803600318.
9
Alfuzosin stone expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a double-blind, placebo controlled study.阿夫唑嗪用于远端输尿管结石排石治疗的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2244-7; discussion 2247. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.141. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
10
2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi.2007年输尿管结石管理指南。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2418-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107.