• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进办公室员工步行 - 使用计步器和电子邮件进行随机对照干预的评估。

Promoting walking among office employees - evaluation of a randomized controlled intervention with pedometers and e-mail messages.

机构信息

The UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, P,O, Box 30, FI-33501, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 6;12:403. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-403.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-403
PMID:22672576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3444317/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate a 6-month intervention to promote office-employees' walking with pedometers and e-mail messages.

METHODS

Participants were recruited by 10 occupational health care units (OHC) from 20 worksites with 2,230 employees. Voluntary and insufficiently physically active employees (N = 241) were randomized to a pedometer (STEP, N = 123) and a comparison group (COMP, N = 118). STEP included one group meeting, log-monitored pedometer-use and six e-mail messages from OHC. COMP participated in data collection. Reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) and costs were assessed with questionnaires (0, 2, 6, 12 months), process evaluation and interviews (12 months).

RESULTS

The intervention reached 29% (N = 646) of employees in terms of participation willingness. Logistic regression showed that the proportion of walkers tended to increase more in STEP than in COMP at 2 months in "walking for transportation" (Odds ratio 2.12, 95%CI 0.94 to 4.81) and at 6 months in "walking for leisure" (1.86, 95%CI 0.94 to 3.69). Linear model revealed a modest increase in the mean duration of "walking stairs" at 2 and 6 months (Geometric mean ratio 1.26, 95%CI 0.98 to 1.61; 1.27, 0.98 to 1.64). Adoption and implementation succeeded as intended. At 12 months, some traces of the intervention were sustained in 15 worksites, and a slightly higher number of walkers in STEP in comparison with COMP was observed in "walking stairs" (OR 2.24, 95%CI 0.94 to 5.31) and in "walking for leisure" (2.07, 95%CI 0.99 to 4.34). The direct costs of the intervention were 43 Euros per participant.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate only modest impact on some indicators of walking. Future studies should invest in reaching the employees, minimizing attrition rate and using objective walking assessment. TRIAL REGISTERATION: ISRCTN79432107.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估一项为期 6 个月的干预措施,该措施通过计步器和电子邮件消息来促进办公室员工的步行活动。

方法

参与者通过 10 个职业保健单位(OHC)从 20 个工作场所招募,共有 2230 名员工。招募了自愿但身体活动不足的员工(N=241),并将其随机分为计步器组(STEP,N=123)和对照组(COMP,N=118)。STEP 组包括一次小组会议、日志监测计步器使用情况和 OHC 发送的六封电子邮件。COMP 组则参与数据收集。使用问卷(0、2、6、12 个月)、过程评估和访谈(12 个月)评估了可达性、有效性、采用率、实施情况、维持率(RE-AIM)和成本。

结果

就参与意愿而言,该干预措施覆盖了 29%(N=646)的员工。逻辑回归显示,在“步行通勤”方面,2 个月时 STEP 组的步行者比例较 COMP 组更倾向于增加(优势比 2.12,95%CI 0.94 至 4.81),而在“休闲步行”方面,6 个月时 STEP 组更倾向于增加(1.86,95%CI 0.94 至 3.69)。线性模型显示,在 2 个月和 6 个月时,“走楼梯”的平均时长略有增加(几何平均比 1.26,95%CI 0.98 至 1.61;1.27,0.98 至 1.64)。采用率和实施情况符合预期。在 12 个月时,15 个工作场所仍能观察到干预措施的一些痕迹,并且在“走楼梯”(OR 2.24,95%CI 0.94 至 5.31)和“休闲步行”(2.07,95%CI 0.99 至 4.34)方面,STEP 组的步行者数量略多于 COMP 组。干预措施的直接成本为每个参与者 43 欧元。

结论

研究结果表明,该干预措施仅对一些步行指标产生了适度的影响。未来的研究应致力于覆盖员工,尽量减少流失率,并使用客观的步行评估方法。

试验注册

ISRCTN79432107。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/3444317/63bc65c6c1d1/1471-2458-12-403-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/3444317/63bc65c6c1d1/1471-2458-12-403-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/3444317/63bc65c6c1d1/1471-2458-12-403-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Promoting walking among office employees - evaluation of a randomized controlled intervention with pedometers and e-mail messages.促进办公室员工步行 - 使用计步器和电子邮件进行随机对照干预的评估。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 6;12:403. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-403.
2
Steps that count! The development of a pedometer-based health promotion intervention in an employed, health insured South African population.有意义的步骤!在一个有雇佣和健康保险的南非人群中,基于计步器的健康促进干预措施的发展。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 17;12:880. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-880.
3
Promoting walking with pedometers in the community: the step-by-step trial.在社区中使用计步器促进步行:逐步试验
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Apr;32(4):290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.12.007. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
4
Staff walking program: a quasi-experimental trial of maintenance newsletters to maintain walking following a pedometer program.员工步行计划:基于计步器方案的维持性通讯对维持步行的准实验研究
Health Promot J Austr. 2010 Apr;21(1):26-32. doi: 10.1071/he10026.
5
Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity.用于增加身体活动量的工作场所计步器干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 21;7(7):CD009209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009209.pub3.
6
Several steps/day indicators predict changes in anthropometric outcomes: HUB City Steps.每天走几步的指标可预测人体测量学结果的变化:HUB 城市步数。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 15;12:983. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-983.
7
Effects of integrating pedometers, parental materials, and E-mail support within an extracurricular school sport intervention.在校外学校体育干预中整合计步器、家长资料和电子邮件支持的效果。
J Adolesc Health. 2009 Feb;44(2):176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.06.020. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
8
Evaluation of the implementation of a whole-workplace walking programme using the RE-AIM framework.使用RE-AIM框架对一项全工作场所步行计划的实施情况进行评估。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 18;17(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4376-7.
9
A RE-AIM Evaluation of a Workplace Physical Activity Microgrant Initiative: The 10,000 Steps Workplace Challenge.一项工作场所体力活动小额赠款计划的再评价:万步职场挑战赛。
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Sep;61(9):718-723. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001653.
10
Randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention by primary care nurses to increase walking in patients aged 60-74 years: protocol of the PACE-Lift (Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation - Lift) trial.一项由初级保健护士实施的复杂干预措施对 60-74 岁患者增加步行量的随机对照试验:PACE-Lift(计步器加速计咨询评估-电梯)试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 4;13:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-5.

引用本文的文献

1
An umbrella review of efficacy of digital health interventions for workers.针对劳动者的数字健康干预措施疗效的综合评价。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 14;8(1):207. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01578-2.
2
Physical Activity and Well-being Status among Employees of University of Medical Sciences.医科大学员工的体育活动与健康状况
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022 Aug 27;36:97. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.97. eCollection 2022.
3
InterMob: a 24-month randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an intervention including behavioural change techniques and free transport versus an intervention including air pollution awareness-raising on car use reduction among regular car users living in Grenoble, France.

本文引用的文献

1
A population-based randomized controlled trial of the effect of combining a pedometer with an intervention toolkit on physical activity among individuals with low levels of physical activity or fitness.一项基于人群的随机对照试验,旨在研究将计步器与干预工具包相结合对低体力活动或低健康水平个体体力活动的影响。
Prev Med. 2012 Feb;54(2):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.12.012. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
2
Associations between social ecological factors and self-reported short physical activity breaks during work hours among desk-based employees.社会生态因素与伏案工作者工作期间自述短暂体力活动中断的相关性研究。
Prev Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;53(1-2):44-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
3
InterMob:一项为期 24 个月的随机对照试验,比较了一项包括行为改变技术和免费交通的干预措施与一项包括提高对空气污染认识的干预措施对居住在法国格勒诺布尔的经常开车的人的汽车使用减少的效果。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;22(1):1763. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14099-4.
4
Evaluating the Application of the RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: An Updated Systematic Review and Exploration of Pragmatic Application.评估 RE-AIM 规划和评估框架的应用:更新的系统评价和实用应用探索。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 26;9:755738. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755738. eCollection 2021.
5
Effectiveness of physical activity monitors in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.体力活动监测器在成年人中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 Jan 26;376:e068047. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068047.
6
Moving minds: Mental health and wellbeing benefits of a 50-day workplace physical activity program.激发思维:一项为期50天的职场体育活动计划对心理健康和幸福感的益处。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jan 10:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02525-6.
7
The effectiveness of digital interventions for increasing physical activity in individuals of low socioeconomic status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.数字干预措施在提高社会经济地位较低个体身体活动中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Nov 9;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01218-4.
8
The effects of long-term physical activity interventions in communities: Scoping review in the Nordic countries.社区中长期体力活动干预的效果:北欧国家的范围综述。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Mar;50(2):272-286. doi: 10.1177/14034948211020599. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
9
Long-term Effectiveness of mHealth Physical Activity Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.移动健康促进身体活动干预的长期效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 30;23(4):e26699. doi: 10.2196/26699.
10
Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity.用于增加身体活动量的工作场所计步器干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 21;7(7):CD009209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009209.pub3.
Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults: a systematic review of prospective studies.
成年人的久坐行为与健康结果:前瞻性研究的系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Feb;40(2):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.015.
4
Characteristics of accelerometry respondents to a mail-based surveillance study.基于邮件的监测研究中使用加速度计的应答者特征。
J Epidemiol. 2010;20(6):446-52. doi: 10.2188/jea.je20100062. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
5
Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review.职业久坐与健康风险:系统综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Oct;39(4):379-88. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.024.
6
How to promote healthy behaviours in patients? An overview of evidence for behaviour change techniques.如何促进患者的健康行为?行为改变技术证据概述。
Health Promot Int. 2011 Jun;26(2):148-62. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq050. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
7
Leisure time spent sitting in relation to total mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults.美国成年人前瞻性队列研究中,休闲时间久坐与全因死亡率的关系。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Aug 15;172(4):419-29. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq155. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
8
Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire for assessing walking.评估步行的国际体力活动问卷的信度和效度。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010 Mar;81(1):97-101. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2010.10599632.
9
Why do pedometers work?: a reflection upon the factors related to successfully increasing physical activity.计步器为何有效?——对与成功增加身体活动相关因素的反思。
Sports Med. 2009;39(12):981-93. doi: 10.2165/11319600-000000000-00000.
10
Do walking strategies to increase physical activity reduce reported sitting in workplaces: a randomized control trial.采用增加身体活动的步行策略是否能减少工作场所的报告久坐时间:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Jul 20;6:43. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-43.