Yang Yun Seok, Hur Myung Haeng, Kim Soo Young
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing Preventive Medicine, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013 Jan;39(1):96-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01908.x. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
Risk assessment for cesarean delivery is not a one-time assessment, but rather a procedure that continues throughout pregnancy and labor. The objective of this study was to develop models to determine risk factors of cesarean delivery in three stages in low-risk pregnancy.
The period from pregnancy to childbirth was divided into three stages, including prenatal care, admission and labor. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop three risk assessment models according to these stages, which were compared by areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
We developed three predictive models with different risk factors. The ability of each model to determine the risk of cesarean delivery differed according to the three stages. The ROC curve values differed significantly between the labor (model III) and prenatal care (model I) or admission (model II) models (z=11.43, P<0.001; z=8.18, P<0.001, respectively). There was also a difference in the ROC between models I and II (z=6.76, P<0.001).
This study shows that the models constructed for the more advanced stages of pregnancy were the more accurate risk factors of cesarean delivery. Therefore, the risk assessment model for cesarean delivery should be differently adapted according to each stage.
剖宫产风险评估并非一次性评估,而是贯穿整个孕期及分娩过程的一项程序。本研究的目的是建立模型以确定低风险妊娠三个阶段剖宫产的风险因素。
将孕期至分娩阶段分为三个时期,包括产前检查、入院及分娩期。采用多变量逻辑回归分析,根据这些阶段建立三个风险评估模型,并通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积进行比较。
我们建立了三个具有不同风险因素的预测模型。每个模型确定剖宫产风险的能力因三个阶段而异。分娩期(模型III)与产前检查期(模型I)或入院期(模型II)模型的ROC曲线值差异显著(分别为z = 11.43,P < 0.001;z = 8.18,P < 0.001)。模型I和模型II之间的ROC也存在差异(z = 6.76,P < 0.001)。
本研究表明,为妊娠后期构建的模型是剖宫产更准确的风险因素。因此,剖宫产风险评估模型应根据每个阶段进行不同调整。