Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug 1;186(3):225-32. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201202-0368OC. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
In the normal lung, breathing and deep inspirations potently antagonize bronchoconstriction, but in the asthmatic lung this salutary effect is substantially attenuated or even reversed. To explain these findings, the prevailing hypothesis focuses on contracting airway smooth muscle and posits a nonlinear dynamic interaction between actomyosin binding and the tethering forces imposed by tidally expanding lung parenchyma.
This hypothesis has never been tested directly in bronchial smooth muscle embedded within intraparenchymal airways. Our objective here is to fill that gap.
We designed a novel system to image contracting intraparenchymal human airways situated within near-normal lung architecture and subjected to dynamic parenchymal expansion that simulates breathing.
Reversal of bronchoconstriction depended on the degree to which breathing actually stretched the airway, which in turn depended negatively on severity of constriction and positively on the depth of breathing. Such behavior implies positive feedbacks that engender airway instability.
These findings help to explain heterogeneity of airflow obstruction as well as why, in people with asthma, deep inspirations are less effective in reversing bronchoconstriction.
在正常的肺部,呼吸和深呼吸有力地拮抗支气管收缩,但在哮喘肺部,这种有益的效果大大减弱,甚至逆转。为了解释这些发现,流行的假说集中在收缩气道平滑肌,并假设肌球蛋白结合和潮汐扩张的肺实质施加的束缚力之间存在非线性动态相互作用。
这一假说从未在嵌入肺实质气道内的支气管平滑肌中得到直接测试。我们的目标是填补这一空白。
我们设计了一种新的系统来成像位于接近正常肺结构内的收缩性肺实质气道,并对模拟呼吸的动态肺实质扩张进行成像。
支气管收缩的逆转取决于呼吸实际上拉伸气道的程度,这反过来又取决于气道收缩的严重程度和呼吸的深度。这种行为暗示了产生气道不稳定的正反馈。
这些发现有助于解释气流阻塞的异质性,以及为什么在哮喘患者中,深呼吸在逆转支气管收缩方面的效果较差。