Bock K
Michigan State University.
Am Psychol. 1990 Nov;45(11):1221-36. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.45.11.1221.
In psycholinguistics, the systematic study of language production has begun to take a place beside the study of language comprehension as a means to the end of understanding human language use. Because a major and very visible component of speaking a language is knowing how to create forms to carry messages, efforts to explain language production must confront long-standing questions about the relationship between structure and function in psychological explanation. One traditionally appealing view of that relationship in the realm of language is that sentence structures are associated with or reducible to the general forces of cognition that drive interpretation and communication. This article surveys some of the challenges to this view that emerge from the study of speech errors, and sketches the progress that has been made in developing an alternative view, renewing the argument that syntactic structures are necessary elements in an explanation of language use.
在心理语言学中，对语言产出的系统研究已开始在对语言理解的研究旁边占据一席之地，作为理解人类语言使用这一目标的一种手段。由于说一种语言的一个主要且非常明显的组成部分是知道如何创造形式来传递信息，解释语言产出的努力必须面对关于心理解释中结构与功能之间关系的长期问题。在语言领域，关于这种关系的一种传统上有吸引力的观点是，句子结构与驱动解释和交流的一般认知力量相关联或可归结为这些力量。本文审视了从言语错误研究中出现的对这一观点的一些挑战，并概述了在发展一种替代观点方面所取得的进展，重申了句法结构是语言使用解释中的必要元素这一论点。
