Suppr超能文献

饥饿评级并非人类所报告食物摄入量的有效替代指标。

Hunger ratings are not a valid proxy measure of reported food intake in humans.

作者信息

Mattes R

机构信息

Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

出版信息

Appetite. 1990 Oct;15(2):103-13. doi: 10.1016/0195-6663(90)90043-8.

Abstract

Hunger ratings have been used as proxy measures of food intake although their validity has not been established. To address this issue, 12 female and 12 male adults of normal weight recorded food intake and hunger ratings every waking hour for 7 consecutive days. Discrepancies were noted in the correlation between hunger ratings and computed energy intake on weekdays vs. weekends, and no significant correlations were observed for individual subjects. Eating often occurred when hunger ratings were low or had not increased, and few individuals displayed a significant correlation between hunger ratings and number of eating occurrences. It was concluded that hunger ratings are not a valid index of energy intake computed from food records or number of eating occurrences.

摘要

饥饿评分一直被用作食物摄入量的替代指标,尽管其有效性尚未得到证实。为了解决这个问题,12名体重正常的成年女性和12名成年男性连续7天每天清醒时记录食物摄入量和饥饿评分。工作日与周末的饥饿评分与计算出的能量摄入量之间的相关性存在差异,且未观察到个体受试者之间有显著相关性。进食常常发生在饥饿评分较低或未增加的时候,很少有人的饥饿评分与进食次数之间呈现出显著相关性。研究得出结论,饥饿评分并非根据食物记录或进食次数计算出的能量摄入量的有效指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验