Suppr超能文献

加拿大实施 ICD-10:对编码医院出院数据有何影响?

Implementation of ICD-10 in Canada: how has it impacted coded hospital discharge data?

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 10;12:149. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-149.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess whether or not the change in coding classification had an impact on diagnosis and comorbidity coding in hospital discharge data across Canadian provinces.

METHODS

This study examined eight years (fiscal years 1998 to 2005) of hospital records from the Hospital Person-Oriented Information database (HPOI) derived from the Canadian national Discharge Abstract Database. The average number of coded diagnoses per hospital visit was examined from 1998 to 2005 for provinces that switched from International Classifications of Disease 9(th) version (ICD-9-CM) to ICD-10-CA during this period. The average numbers of type 2 and 3 diagnoses were also described. The prevalence of the Charlson comorbidities and distribution of the Charlson score one year before and one year after ICD-10 implementation for each of the 9 provinces was examined. The prevalence of at least one of the seventeen Charlson comorbidities one year before and one year after ICD-10 implementation were described by hospital characteristics (teaching/non-teaching, urban/rural, volume of patients).

RESULTS

Nine Canadian provinces switched from ICD-9-CM to ICD-I0-CA over a 6 year period starting in 2001. The average number of diagnoses coded per hospital visit for all code types over the study period was 2.58. After implementation of ICD-10-CA a decrease in the number of diagnoses coded was found in four provinces whereas the number of diagnoses coded in the other five provinces remained similar. The prevalence of at least one of the seventeen Charlson conditions remained relatively stable after ICD-10 was implemented, as did the distribution of the Charlson score. When stratified by hospital characteristics, the prevalence of at least one Charlson condition decreased after ICD-10-CA implementation, particularly for low volume hospitals.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, implementation of ICD-10-CA in Canadian provinces did not substantially change coding practices, but there was some coding variation in the average number of diagnoses per hospital visit across provinces.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估加拿大各省的医院出院数据中编码分类的变化是否会对诊断和合并症编码产生影响。

方法

本研究检查了 1998 年至 2005 年期间来自加拿大国家出院摘要数据库的医院人员信息数据库(HPOI)的八年医院记录。在此期间,从国际疾病分类第 9 版(ICD-9-CM)切换到 ICD-10-CA 的省份,检查了每个医院就诊的平均编码诊断数量。还描述了 2 型和 3 型诊断的平均数量。检查了每个省份在 ICD-10 实施前后一年 Charlson 合并症的患病率和 Charlson 评分的分布。检查了 ICD-10 实施前后一年每个省份至少有 17 种 Charlson 合并症之一的患病率,并按医院特征(教学/非教学、城市/农村、患者数量)进行了描述。

结果

在 2001 年开始的六年期间,9 个加拿大省份从 ICD-9-CM 切换到 ICD-10-CA。在整个研究期间,所有类型的编码诊断的平均就诊次数为 2.58 次。在实施 ICD-10-CA 后,四个省份的编码诊断数量减少,而其他五个省份的编码诊断数量保持相似。在实施 ICD-10 后,至少有一种 17 种 Charlson 疾病的患病率保持相对稳定,Charlson 评分的分布也保持稳定。按医院特征分层时,在实施 ICD-10-CA 后,至少有一种 Charlson 疾病的患病率下降,特别是对于低容量医院。

结论

总之,加拿大各省实施 ICD-10-CA 并未实质性改变编码做法,但在各省每个医院就诊的平均诊断数量方面存在一些编码差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f1/3411494/785da2c7bb77/1472-6963-12-149-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验