• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克林霉素、甲硝唑、林可霉素加庆大霉素治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎的随机对照疗效

Randomised comparative efficacy of clindamycin, metronidazole, and lincomycin, plus gentamicin in chronic suppurative otitis media.

作者信息

Rotimi V O, Olabiyi D A, Banjo T O, Okeowo P A

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology & Parasitology, College of Medicine, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

出版信息

West Afr J Med. 1990 Apr-Jun;9(2):89-97.

PMID:2268574
Abstract

Chronic suppurative otitis media is major health problem seen frequently in the ENT clinics in Nigeria and the outcome of most medical management in the past have been disappointing. A comparative randomised clinical trial involving combination therapies with systemic clindamycin, metronidazole, lincomycin, each with gentamicin, was conducted on a total of 14 patients. At the end of one week, and three-week, follow-up end points the clinical response with bacteriological cure were, for clindamycin and gentamicin 21%, metronidazole and gentamicin 33%, lincomycin and gentamicin 22%, and the control (aural toilet alone) 14%. However, when the clinical response was measured only by the ceasation of discharge, the outcome was more impressive. By this assessment the clinical response with clindamycin and gentamicin was 52% of the 140 patients, metronidazole and gentamicin 69%, lincomycin and gentamicin 47%, and the control 24%. The metronidazole and gentamicin regime was significantly more effective than the other regimes and it is suggested for use in prophylactic treatment of CSOM patients undergoing surgical procedures.

摘要

慢性化脓性中耳炎是尼日利亚耳鼻喉科诊所中常见的主要健康问题,过去大多数药物治疗的效果都不尽人意。一项针对14名患者的比较随机临床试验,采用了克林霉素、甲硝唑、林可霉素分别与庆大霉素联合治疗的方法。在一周和三周的随访终点时,克林霉素与庆大霉素联合治疗的细菌学治愈率为21%,甲硝唑与庆大霉素联合治疗为33%,林可霉素与庆大霉素联合治疗为22%,而对照组(仅进行耳部冲洗)为14%。然而,当仅通过停止流脓来衡量临床反应时,结果更令人印象深刻。通过这种评估,在140名患者中,克林霉素与庆大霉素联合治疗的临床反应率为52%,甲硝唑与庆大霉素联合治疗为69%,林可霉素与庆大霉素联合治疗为47%,对照组为24%。甲硝唑与庆大霉素联合治疗方案明显比其他方案更有效,建议用于接受外科手术的慢性化脓性中耳炎患者的预防性治疗。

相似文献

1
Randomised comparative efficacy of clindamycin, metronidazole, and lincomycin, plus gentamicin in chronic suppurative otitis media.克林霉素、甲硝唑、林可霉素加庆大霉素治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎的随机对照疗效
West Afr J Med. 1990 Apr-Jun;9(2):89-97.
2
Ciprofloxacin monotherapy for acute pelvic infections: a comparison with clindamycin plus gentamicin.环丙沙星单药治疗急性盆腔感染:与克林霉素加庆大霉素的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;78(4):696-702.
3
Topical ciprofloxacin versus topical gentamicin for chronic otitis media.环丙沙星局部用药与庆大霉素局部用药治疗慢性中耳炎的比较
East Mediterr Health J. 2001 Jan-Mar;7(1-2):26-30.
4
Clinical comparison of cefotaxime versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial soft-tissue surgical sepsis.
Clin Ther. 1982;5 Suppl A:26-31.
5
Comparison of metronidazole with clindamycin-gentamycin combination in the prevention of infectious complications after elective colonic surgery.甲硝唑与克林霉素 - 庆大霉素联合用药在择期结肠手术后预防感染性并发症方面的比较。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1982;71(6):317-20.
6
[Comparison of a combination of clindamycin/gentamycin with metronidazole/gentamycin in surgery of the head and neck].克林霉素/庆大霉素组合与甲硝唑/庆大霉素在头颈外科手术中的比较
Chir Maxillofac Plast. 1988;18(1-3):15-20.
7
Piperacillin versus clindamycin plus gentamicin for pelvic infections.哌拉西林与克林霉素加庆大霉素治疗盆腔感染的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Dec;64(6):762-6.
8
A comparison of three different prophylactic parenteral antibiotic regimens in colorectal surgery: a prospective study.结直肠手术中三种不同预防性肠外抗生素方案的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Int Surg. 1985 Jul-Sep;70(3):227-31.
9
Clindamycin in treatment of chronic recurrent suppurative otitis media in children.克林霉素治疗儿童慢性复发性化脓性中耳炎
J Laryngol Otol. 1980 Jun;94(6):607-15. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100089313.
10
Double-blind comparison of metronidazole plus gentamicin and clindamycin plus gentamicin in intra-abdominal infection.
Surgery. 1983 Jan;93(1 Pt 2):215-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的全身性抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013052.pub3.
2
Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的局部用抗生素与全身用抗生素对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013053. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013053.pub3.
3
Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的全身抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD013052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013052.pub2.
4
Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.局部用抗生素与全身用抗生素治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎的疗效比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 9;2(2):CD013053. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013053.pub2.
5
Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的局部用抗菌剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 6;1(1):CD013055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013055.pub2.
6
Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.抗生素与外用消毒剂治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 6;1(1):CD013056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013056.pub2.
7
Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的局部用抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 2;1(1):CD013051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013051.pub2.