• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环丙沙星单药治疗急性盆腔感染:与克林霉素加庆大霉素的比较。

Ciprofloxacin monotherapy for acute pelvic infections: a comparison with clindamycin plus gentamicin.

作者信息

Thadepalli H, Mathai D, Scotti R, Bansal M B, Savage E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Martin Luther King Jr. General Hospital, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;78(4):696-702.

PMID:1923175
Abstract

This prospective, randomized controlled study compared the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin alone versus a conventional two-drug regimen, clindamycin with gentamicin. The study group included 71 patients hospitalized for pelvic infections such as acute (N = 33) and chronic (N = 8) salpingitis, tubo-ovarian abscesses (N = 11), endometritis (N = 9), septic abortion (N = 3), and other categories (N = 7). Twenty-two of 35 patients on ciprofloxacin and 20 of 36 on clindamycin plus gentamicin had culturable pathogens: gonococci in 28, anaerobes in six, chlamydia in four, and associated pathogens in 19. Complete clinical and bacteriologic cure was achieved in 21 of 22 (95%) in the ciprofloxacin group and 19 of 20 (95%) in the clindamycin plus gentamicin group. The mean duration of intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin therapy was 3.7/7.2 days, and it was 3/6.6 days for clindamycin plus gentamicin. Ciprofloxacin, a new quinolone, appears to be safe as a single-drug therapy and was as effective as the combination of clindamycin plus gentamicin for the treatment of severe pelvic infections requiring hospitalization.

摘要

这项前瞻性随机对照研究比较了环丙沙星单药疗法与传统两药联合疗法(克林霉素加庆大霉素)的疗效和安全性。研究组包括71例因盆腔感染住院的患者,如急性(N = 33)和慢性(N = 8)输卵管炎、输卵管卵巢脓肿(N = 11)、子宫内膜炎(N = 9)、感染性流产(N = 3)以及其他类型(N = 7)。35例接受环丙沙星治疗的患者中有22例以及36例接受克林霉素加庆大霉素治疗的患者中有20例培养出了可培养病原体:28例为淋球菌,6例为厌氧菌,4例为衣原体,19例为相关病原体。环丙沙星组22例中的21例(95%)以及克林霉素加庆大霉素组20例中的19例(95%)实现了完全临床和细菌学治愈。环丙沙星静脉/口服治疗的平均疗程为3.7/7.2天,克林霉素加庆大霉素为3/6.6天。新型喹诺酮类药物环丙沙星作为单药疗法似乎是安全的,并且在治疗需要住院的严重盆腔感染方面与克林霉素加庆大霉素联合疗法效果相当。

相似文献

1
Ciprofloxacin monotherapy for acute pelvic infections: a comparison with clindamycin plus gentamicin.环丙沙星单药治疗急性盆腔感染:与克林霉素加庆大霉素的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;78(4):696-702.
2
Piperacillin versus clindamycin plus gentamicin for pelvic infections.哌拉西林与克林霉素加庆大霉素治疗盆腔感染的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Dec;64(6):762-6.
3
A randomized comparison of gentamicin-clindamycin and cefoxitin-doxycycline in the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.庆大霉素-克林霉素与头孢西丁-多西环素治疗急性盆腔炎的随机对照研究
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 May;75(5):867-72.
4
Ciprofloxacin monotherapy for acute pelvic infections: a comparison with clindamycin plus gentamicin.环丙沙星单药治疗急性盆腔感染:与克林霉素加庆大霉素的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Apr;79(4):639-40.
5
Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/tazobactam Study Group.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗住院盆腔感染女性的疗效比较。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦研究组
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;83(2):280-6.
6
Comparison of cefoxitin and clindamycin-gentamicin for pelvic infections.头孢西丁与克林霉素-庆大霉素治疗盆腔感染的比较。
Clin Ther. 1986;9(1):77-83.
7
Ciprofloxacin versus gentamicin/clindamycin for postpartum endometritis.环丙沙星与庆大霉素/克林霉素治疗产后子宫内膜炎的比较
J Reprod Med. 1991 Dec;36(12):857-61.
8
Comparison of parenteral ciprofloxacin with clindamycin-gentamicin in the treatment of pelvic infection.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):148S-151S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90046-6.
9
A comparison of piperacillin and clindamycin plus gentamicin in women with pelvic infections.哌拉西林与克林霉素加庆大霉素治疗女性盆腔感染的比较。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Aug;163(2):156-62.
10
A prospective randomized study of moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in penetrating abdominal trauma.一项关于头孢氧哌唑与庆大霉素及克林霉素治疗腹部穿透伤的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jul;163(1):1-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Physicochemical Characteristics of Antimicrobials and Practical Recommendations for Intravenous Administration: A Systematic Review.抗菌药物的物理化学特性及静脉给药实用建议:一项系统评价
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Aug 19;12(8):1338. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081338.
2
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 20;8(8):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub3.
3
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
盆腔炎症性疾病的抗生素治疗:Cochrane 系统评价和随机对照试验荟萃分析的精简版。
Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Feb;95(1):21-27. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053693. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub2.
5
Pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎性疾病
BMJ Clin Evid. 2013 Dec 11;2013:1606.
6
Pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎
BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Mar 10;2008:1606.
7
Do short-term markers of treatment efficacy predict long-term sequelae of pelvic inflammatory disease?治疗效果的短期指标能否预测盆腔炎的长期后遗症?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;198(1):30.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.021.
8
Ciprofloxacin. An updated review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability.环丙沙星。对其药理学、治疗效果及耐受性的最新综述。
Drugs. 1996 Jun;51(6):1019-74. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651060-00010.