• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤累及百分比与低危前列腺癌 Gleason 评分升级的相关性。

Association between percentage of tumor involvement and Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke Prostate Center, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 2804, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Med Oncol. 2012 Dec;29(5):3339-44. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0270-4. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1007/s12032-012-0270-4
PMID:22688447
Abstract

To find the predictors of Gleason score upgrading in a cohort of low-risk prostate cancer patients, data were analyzed comprising 1,632 consecutive men with low-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1993 and 2009. Assessment focused on preoperative parameters including patient age, race, diagnostic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason score, along with pathological parameters including percentage of tumor involvement (PTI), tumor laterality, pathological stage, extra-capsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and surgical margins. These parameters were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. Kaplan-Meier curves compared differences in biochemical disease-free survival in men having cancers with and without Gleason score upgrading. Cases involving pathological Gleason score upgrading were identified in 723 (44.3 %) of 1,632 patients. Kaplan-Meier PSA recurrence-free survival curves showed a difference in outcome between men with and without Gleason score upgrading (p < 0.001). Of Gleason score upgraded patients, 35 (4.8 %) men had PTI of <5 %, 237 (32.8 %) had PTI of 5-9.9 %, 177 (24.5 %) had PTI of 10-14.9 %, and 274 (37.9 %) had PTI ≥ 15 % (p < 0.001). PTI (p < 0.001) along with diagnostic PSA, patient age, diagnostic biopsy Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin status were independent predictors of pathological Gleason score upgrading on multivariate logistic regression. PTI correlates closely with Gleason score upgrading in a low-risk prostate cancer cohort. Low-risk prostate cancer patients with clinical findings suggestive of high PTI or large volume cancers should not benefit from active surveillance strategies.

摘要

为了找到低危前列腺癌患者中 Gleason 评分升级的预测因素,分析了 1993 年至 2009 年间接受根治性前列腺切除术的 1632 例连续低危前列腺癌患者的数据。评估重点包括术前参数,包括患者年龄、种族、诊断前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 水平、临床分期和活检 Gleason 评分,以及病理参数,包括肿瘤累及百分比 (PTI)、肿瘤侧别、病理分期、包膜外延伸、精囊侵犯和手术切缘。这些参数使用单变量和多变量方法进行分析。Kaplan-Meier 曲线比较了有和无 Gleason 评分升级的癌症患者在生化无病生存方面的差异。在 1632 例患者中,有 723 例 (44.3%) 发生了病理 Gleason 评分升级。Kaplan-Meier PSA 无复发生存曲线显示,Gleason 评分升级的男性与无 Gleason 评分升级的男性之间的结果存在差异 (p < 0.001)。在 Gleason 评分升级的患者中,35 例 (4.8%) 患者的 PTI < 5%,237 例 (32.8%) 患者的 PTI 为 5-9.9%,177 例 (24.5%) 患者的 PTI 为 10-14.9%,274 例 (37.9%) 患者的 PTI≥15% (p < 0.001)。PTI (p < 0.001) 以及诊断 PSA、患者年龄、诊断活检 Gleason 评分、病理分期和手术切缘状态是多变量逻辑回归中病理 Gleason 评分升级的独立预测因素。PTI 与低危前列腺癌队列中的 Gleason 评分升级密切相关。具有高 PTI 或大体积肿瘤临床特征的低危前列腺癌患者不应受益于主动监测策略。

相似文献

1
Association between percentage of tumor involvement and Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer.肿瘤累及百分比与低危前列腺癌 Gleason 评分升级的相关性。
Med Oncol. 2012 Dec;29(5):3339-44. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0270-4. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
2
Preoperative predictors of pathologic stage T2a and pathologic Gleason score ≤ 6 in men with clinical low-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: reference for active surveillance.根治性前列腺切除术治疗的临床低危前列腺癌男性患者中 T2a 病理分期和病理 Gleason 评分≤6 的术前预测因素:主动监测的参考依据。
Med Oncol. 2013 Mar;30(1):326. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0326-5. Epub 2012 Dec 22.
3
Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的临床和病理预测因素:单机构系列研究结果。
Urol Oncol. 2011 Sep-Oct;29(5):508-14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
4
Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.基于活检 Gleason 评分和 PSA 的早期前列腺癌患者的病理性升级或局部进展风险:现代患者的基于人群研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 1;92(2):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.051. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
5
Optimizing patient selection for prostate monotherapy.优化前列腺单一疗法的患者选择。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Mar 1;49(3):673-7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01421-8.
6
Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.根治性前列腺切除术与手术切缘阳性:与前列腺癌预后的关系。
Int Braz J Urol. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):306-15. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.03.03.
7
Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.基于当代多核心前列腺活检的前列腺特异性抗原与前列腺特异性抗原密度对诊断为 Gleason 6 前列腺癌患者升级的预测作用。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E494-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11182.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
8
Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.低危前列腺癌患者符合前列腺癌国际主动监测标准行根治性前列腺切除术的病理和生化结局。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):914-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11658.x. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
9
Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer.肿瘤体积、手术切缘与局限期前列腺癌患者生化复发风险的关系
Urol Oncol. 2013 Feb;31(2):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.11.005. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
10
[Risk factors of ISUP Modified Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy].[根治性前列腺切除术后ISUP改良Gleason评分升级的危险因素]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2016 May;22(5):415-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.前列腺穿刺活检至根治性前列腺切除术中Gleason评分升级的危险因素。
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024;5(4):981-996. doi: 10.37349/etat.2024.00259. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Comparing histology between prostate cognitive fusion targeted biopsy and radical prostatectomy: exploring risk factors of Gleason score upgrading in Chinese patients.对比前列腺认知融合靶向活检和根治性前列腺切除术的组织学表现:探究中国患者 Gleason 评分升级的风险因素。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(20):18029-18037. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05506-3. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes in localized prostate cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden follow-up study.局限性前列腺癌的预后:瑞典国家前列腺癌登记处随访研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jul 7;102(13):950-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq154. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
2
Tumor volume, tumor percentage involvement, or prostate volume: which is predictive of prostate-specific antigen recurrence?肿瘤体积、肿瘤受累百分比还是前列腺体积:哪个能预测前列腺特异性抗原复发?
Urology. 2010 Feb;75(2):460-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.059. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
3
Short-term outcomes of the prospective multicentre 'Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance' study.
Influence of Active Surveillance on Gleason Score Upgrade and Prognosis in Low- and Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.
主动监测对低危和中危前列腺癌中 Gleason 评分升级和预后的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Oct 21;29(10):7964-7978. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100630.
4
Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort.在中国队列中分析根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的危险因素。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7772-7780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4274. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
5
Liquid Biopsy Potential Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌中的液体活检潜在生物标志物
Diagnostics (Basel). 2018 Sep 21;8(4):68. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics8040068.
6
Outcomes of combination MRI-targeted and transperineal template biopsy in restaging low-risk prostate cancer for active surveillance.联合MRI靶向和经会阴模板活检在低风险前列腺癌再分期以进行主动监测中的结果。
Asian J Urol. 2018 Jul;5(3):184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
7
Gleason group concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens: A cohort study from Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry - Victoria.活检与根治性前列腺切除术标本之间的Gleason分级一致性:来自维多利亚前列腺癌结果登记处的队列研究。
Prostate Int. 2016 Dec;4(4):145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
The use of targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on radical prostatectomy.使用靶向磁共振引导下前列腺穿刺活检可降低根治性前列腺切除术中 Gleason 分级升级的风险。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov;141(11):2061-8. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-1991-5. Epub 2015 May 27.
9
The effect of differing Gleason scores at biopsy on the odds of upgrading and the risk of death from prostate cancer.活检时不同Gleason评分对前列腺癌升级几率及死亡风险的影响。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014 Oct;12(5):e181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
10
The Study of Active Monitoring in Sweden (SAMS): a randomized study comparing two different follow-up schedules for active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer.瑞典主动监测研究(SAMS):一项比较两种不同随访方案对低危前列腺癌进行主动监测的随机研究。
Scand J Urol. 2013 Oct;47(5):347-55. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.813962. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
前瞻性多中心“前列腺癌研究国际:主动监测”研究的短期结果。
BJU Int. 2010 Apr;105(7):956-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08887.x. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
4
Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting.经会阴模板引导靶向活检在初始和重复活检中检测前列腺癌的性能。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2010 Mar;13(1):71-7. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2009.42. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
5
Contemporary risk profile of prostate cancer in the United States.美国前列腺癌的当代风险概况。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Sep 16;101(18):1280-3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp262. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
6
Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.活检组织条数量是低风险前列腺癌患者临床显著 Gleason 评分升级的最重要预测因素之一。
Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1087-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.048. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
7
Prediction of Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancers diagnosed via multi (> or = 12)-core prostate biopsy.经多(≥12)针前列腺穿刺活检诊断的低风险前列腺癌中 Gleason 评分升级的预测
World J Urol. 2009 Apr;27(2):271-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-008-0343-3. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
8
Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.预测中、高级别前列腺癌患者显著分级变化的前列腺活检临床和病理变量。
BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(1):43-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08059.x. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
9
Prostate cancer laterality does not predict prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌的侧别不能预测根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原复发情况。
Urology. 2007 Dec;70(6):1141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.066.
10
Active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer: what are the results, and how safe is it?对低危前列腺癌进行主动监测:结果如何,安全性如何?
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008 Jan;18(1):2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.09.001.