• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进机构审查委员会批准多中心研究的方法。

Approaches to facilitate institutional review board approval of multicenter research studies.

机构信息

Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S77-81. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a76eb.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a76eb
PMID:22692264
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Gaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval for a multicenter research study can be a lengthy and time-consuming process. It can increase the complexity of consent forms, decreasing patient understanding and lowering recruitment numbers. It also leads to increased costs through the duplication of effort. This paper examines some of the strategies used to streamline the IRB review process for multicenter studies and provides examples used by 2 existing multicenter comparative effectiveness research networks.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to identify sources that described the challenges and potential strategies to facilitate multicenter IRB approval. The most promising avenues were identified and included in this review. Phone interviews were conducted with the Principal Investigators and Project Managers of 2 successful multicenter research networks to learn their "keys to success" and their lessons learned.

RESULTS

Three strategies were identified that held the most promise: working with IRBs before submission, the use of central and/or federated IRBs, and the establishment of an umbrella protocol. Each of these strategies was used to some degree by the case study projects.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the approaches documented here can help streamline the IRB approval process, they are not a "silver bullet." Because some of these approaches are still relatively new, empirical data are sparse. However, it is believed that they will significantly reduce the administrative burden of the project as a whole and lead to a decrease in the overall time to protocol approval.

摘要

背景与目的

获得机构审查委员会(IRB)对多中心研究的批准可能是一个漫长而耗时的过程。这可能会增加同意书的复杂性,降低患者的理解程度,并降低招募人数。此外,由于重复工作,还会导致成本增加。本文探讨了一些简化多中心研究 IRB 审查过程的策略,并提供了两个现有的多中心比较效果研究网络所使用的示例。

方法

进行了文献检索,以确定描述促进多中心 IRB 批准的挑战和潜在策略的来源。确定了最有前途的途径,并将其纳入本综述。对两个成功的多中心研究网络的主要研究者和项目经理进行了电话访谈,以了解他们的“成功关键”和经验教训。

结果

确定了三种最有前途的策略:在提交前与 IRB 合作、使用中央和/或联邦 IRB 以及建立保护伞协议。案例研究项目在某种程度上使用了这些策略中的每一种。

结论

尽管这里记录的方法可以帮助简化 IRB 批准过程,但它们并不是“灵丹妙药”。由于其中一些方法仍然相对较新,因此经验数据很少。然而,人们相信它们将大大减轻整个项目的行政负担,并导致协议批准的总体时间缩短。

相似文献

1
Approaches to facilitate institutional review board approval of multicenter research studies.促进机构审查委员会批准多中心研究的方法。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S77-81. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a76eb.
2
A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve Institutional Review Board approval.一项综述发现,多中心研究面临重大挑战,但存在实现机构审查委员会批准的策略。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;59(8):784-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.018. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
3
Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol.机构审查委员会对一项标准的、观察性的儿科研究方案的反应差异。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;14(4):377-80. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.11.031. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
4
Use of central institutional review boards for multicenter clinical trials in the United States: a review of the literature.美国多中心临床试验中使用中心机构审查委员会:文献回顾。
Clin Trials. 2013 Aug;10(4):560-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774513484393. Epub 2013 May 10.
5
Institutional review board variability in minimal-risk multicenter urogynecology studies.机构审查委员会在低风险多中心泌尿妇科研究中的差异
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):89-92. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318249bd40.
6
Notes from the field: jumpstarting the IRB approval process in multicenter studies.实地记录:在多中心研究中启动机构审查委员会(IRB)审批流程
Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1773-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00687.x.
7
Review of multicenter studies by multiple institutional review boards: characteristics and outcomes for perinatal studies implemented by a multicenter network.多中心研究的综述:由多中心网络实施的围产期研究的特点和结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;212(1):110.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
8
Variation in local institutional review board evaluations of a multicenter patient safety study.多中心患者安全研究在当地机构审查委员会评估中的差异。
J Healthc Qual. 2012 Jul-Aug;34(4):33-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00150.x. Epub 2011 May 25.
9
Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board: lessons learned from developing a multicenter regional institutional review board.安大略癌症研究伦理委员会:建立多中心区域机构审查委员会的经验教训。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 20;26(9):1479-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6441.
10
Variation in Institutional Review processes for a multisite observational study.一项多中心观察性研究中机构审查流程的差异
Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):805-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.024.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in institutional ethical review process and approval for international multicenter clinical studies in lower and middle-income countries: the case of PARITY study.中低收入国家国际多中心临床研究的机构伦理审查流程及批准方面的挑战:以PARITY研究为例
Front Pediatr. 2024 Nov 5;12:1460377. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1460377. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of learning in emergency medicine: An umbrella IRB protocol for education outcomes research.急诊医学学习评估:一项用于教育成果研究的综合机构审查委员会方案
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Sep 22;8(5):e11027. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11027. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
The Benefit of an Umbrella Protocol: Reducing Challenges in Orthopedic Oncology Research.
伞形方案的益处:减少骨肿瘤学研究中的挑战
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 8;13(6):1551. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061551.
4
[Variability and discrepancies between Ethics Committees in the evaluation of academic research projects].[伦理委员会在学术研究项目评估中的变异性与差异]
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2023 Jun 30;80(2):85-87. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v80.n2.39412.
5
Management strategies for implementing a multicenter cross-sectional study: lessons from the ADHERE Brazil study.实施多中心横断面研究的管理策略:来自 ADHERE Brazil 研究的经验教训。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 May-Jun;140(3):439-446. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0492.R1.15092021.
6
Conducting multicenter research in healthcare simulation: Lessons learned from the INSPIRE network.开展医疗保健模拟领域的多中心研究:从INSPIRE网络中汲取的经验教训。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Feb 28;2:6. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0039-0. eCollection 2017.
7
Sustaining Research Networks: the Twenty-Year Experience of the HMO Research Network.维持研究网络:健康维护组织研究网络的二十年经验
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Jun 9;2(2):1067. eCollection 2014.
8
Accelerating regulatory progress in multi-institutional research.加速多机构研究中的监管进程。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Jul 10;2(1):1076. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1076. eCollection 2014.
9
eGEMs: Pathways to Success for Multisite Clinical Data Research.电子生成式证据模型:多中心临床数据研究的成功途径
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Sep 19;1(1):1041. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1041. eCollection 2013.
10
Preparing Electronic Clinical Data for Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research: The SCOAP CERTAIN Automation and Validation Project.为质量改进和比较效果研究准备电子临床数据:SCOAP CERTAIN自动化与验证项目
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Sep 10;1(1):1025. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1025. eCollection 2013.