• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动型运动控制可降低赌博中的货币风险承担。

Proactive motor control reduces monetary risk taking in gambling.

机构信息

Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Washington Singer Laboratories, Streatham Campus, Exeter, EX4 4QG, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):805-15. doi: 10.1177/0956797611434538. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1177/0956797611434538
PMID:22692336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3724270/
Abstract

Less supervision by the executive system after disruption of the right prefrontal cortex leads to increased risk taking in gambling because superficially attractive-but risky-choices are not suppressed. Similarly, people might gamble more in multitask situations than in single-task situations because concurrent executive processes usually interfere with each other. In the study reported here, we used a novel monetary decision-making paradigm to investigate whether multitasking could reduce rather than increase risk taking in gambling. We found that performing a task that induced cautious motor responding reduced gambling in a multitask situation (Experiment 1). We then found that a short period of inhibitory training lessened risk taking in gambling at least 2 hr later (Experiments 2 and 3). Our findings indicate that proactive motor control strongly affects monetary risk taking in gambling. The link between control systems at different cognitive levels might be exploited to develop new methods for rehabilitation of addiction and impulse-control disorders.

摘要

右前额叶皮层受到干扰后,执行系统的监督减少,导致赌博风险增加,因为表面上有吸引力但风险高的选择不会被抑制。同样,人们在多任务情况下可能会比在单任务情况下赌得更多,因为并发的执行过程通常会相互干扰。在本研究中,我们使用了一种新的货币决策范式来研究多任务处理是否会减少而不是增加赌博风险。我们发现,执行一项诱发谨慎运动反应的任务可以减少多任务情况下的赌博(实验 1)。然后我们发现,短时间的抑制训练至少在 2 小时后可以减轻赌博中的风险(实验 2 和 3)。我们的研究结果表明,主动运动控制强烈影响赌博中的金钱风险。不同认知水平的控制系统之间的联系可能被利用来开发新的方法来治疗成瘾和冲动控制障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faf0/3724270/f972626a3452/10.1177_0956797611434538-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faf0/3724270/80607e0f2913/10.1177_0956797611434538-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faf0/3724270/ee192942d75f/10.1177_0956797611434538-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faf0/3724270/bce5a0386919/10.1177_0956797611434538-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faf0/3724270/924feb2f96c1/10.1177_0956797611434538-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faf0/3724270/f972626a3452/10.1177_0956797611434538-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faf0/3724270/80607e0f2913/10.1177_0956797611434538-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faf0/3724270/ee192942d75f/10.1177_0956797611434538-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faf0/3724270/bce5a0386919/10.1177_0956797611434538-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faf0/3724270/924feb2f96c1/10.1177_0956797611434538-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faf0/3724270/f972626a3452/10.1177_0956797611434538-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Proactive motor control reduces monetary risk taking in gambling.主动型运动控制可降低赌博中的货币风险承担。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):805-15. doi: 10.1177/0956797611434538. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
2
Dissociation between decision making under ambiguity and risk in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.青少年肌阵挛癫痫患者在模糊决策和风险下的分离。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Dec;101(Pt A):106548. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106548. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
3
Big losses lead to irrational decision-making in gambling situations: relationship between deliberation and impulsivity.大损失导致赌博情境下的非理性决策:深思熟虑与冲动之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 23;5(2):e9368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009368.
4
Interactions of age and cognitive functions in predicting decision making under risky conditions over the life span.年龄与认知功能在预测整个生命周期风险条件下的决策中的交互作用。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(1):9-23. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.740000. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
5
Prediction of alcohol and gambling problems in young adults by using a measure of decision making.使用决策测量法预测年轻人的酒精和赌博问题。
J Addict Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;7(5):314-9. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e31829a2f32.
6
Prefrontal cortex activity is reduced in gambling and nongambling substance users during decision-making.在决策过程中,赌博和非赌博类物质使用者的前额叶皮层活动会减少。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Dec;28(12):1276-86. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20344.
7
Obesity and dissociable forms of impulsivity in young adults.年轻人的肥胖症与冲动的可分离形式。
CNS Spectr. 2015 Oct;20(5):500-7. doi: 10.1017/S1092852914000625. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
8
Decision-making deficits in pathological gambling: the role of executive functions, explicit knowledge and impulsivity in relation to decisions made under ambiguity and risk.病理性赌博中的决策缺陷:执行功能、明确知识和冲动性在不确定性和风险下做出决策中的作用。
Am J Addict. 2013 Sep-Oct;22(5):492-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2013.12061.x. Epub 2013 May 30.
9
Enhancing decision-making and cognitive impulse control with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC): A randomized and sham-controlled exploratory study.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作用于眶额叶皮质(OFC)以增强决策能力和认知冲动控制:一项随机、假刺激对照的探索性研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Oct;69:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.07.018. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
10
[Decision making and the Iowa Gambling Task: relevance to dependence study].[决策与爱荷华赌博任务:与成瘾研究的相关性]
Nihon Arukoru Yakubutsu Igakkai Zasshi. 2010 Oct;45(5):420-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual-task effects of walking-speed on inhibitory control and decision-making under risk.步行速度对风险下抑制控制和决策的双重任务效应。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 22;15(1):13877. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88497-0.
2
Stimulus variability improves generalization following response inhibition training.刺激变异性可提高反应抑制训练后的泛化能力。
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):786-802. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01913-w. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Pilot testing of an adaptive, individualized inhibitory control training for binge drinking: first evidence on feasibility, acceptance, and efficacy.

本文引用的文献

1
Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control.冲动性、强迫性和自上而下的认知控制。
Neuron. 2011 Feb 24;69(4):680-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.020.
2
From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses.从反应性到主动性和选择性控制:开发一种更丰富的模型来停止不适当的反应。
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):e55-68. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
3
Prefrontal cortex and impulsive decision making.前额皮质与冲动决策。
一项针对 binge drinking 的自适应个体化抑制控制训练的初步试验:关于可行性、可接受性和疗效的初步证据。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1267-1283. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01725-4. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
4
The field of expertise modulates the time course of neural processes associated with inhibitory control in a sport decision-making task.专业领域调节了与运动决策任务中的抑制控制相关的神经过程的时间进程。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 10;12(1):7657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11580-3.
5
Proactive and reactive inhibitory control are differently affected by video game addiction: An event-related potential study.主动和被动抑制控制受视频游戏成瘾的影响不同:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Behav. 2022 Jun;12(6):e2584. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2584. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
6
The role of attention control in complex real-world tasks.注意控制在复杂真实世界任务中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1143-1197. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02052-2. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
7
High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex modulates decision-making and executive control.对背侧前扣带回皮层进行高清经颅直流电刺激可调节决策和执行控制。
Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Jun;227(5):1565-1576. doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02456-3. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
Effector-Specific Characterization of Brain Dynamics in Manual vs. Oculomotor Go/NoGo Tasks.手动与动眼Go/NoGo任务中脑动力学的效应器特异性特征
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Dec 3;14:600667. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.600667. eCollection 2020.
9
Prediction of Human Inhibition Brain Function with Inter-Subject and Intra-Subject Variability.考虑个体间和个体内变异性的人类抑制脑功能预测
Brain Sci. 2020 Oct 13;10(10):726. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100726.
10
The Effect of Response Inhibition Training on Risky Decision-Making Task Performance.反应抑制训练对风险决策任务表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 24;11:1806. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01806. eCollection 2020.
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):1140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.005. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
4
Inhibitory control and psychopathology: a meta-analysis of studies using the stop signal task.抑制控制与精神病理学:使用停止信号任务的研究的荟萃分析。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Nov;16(6):1064-76. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000895. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
5
Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008.经颅直流电刺激:2008 年的最新技术。
Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
6
Building Self-Control Strength: Practicing Self-Control Leads to Improved Self-Control Performance.增强自我控制能力:练习自我控制会带来更好的自我控制表现。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar 1;46(2):465-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.011.
7
Decision-making during gambling: an integration of cognitive and psychobiological approaches.赌博中的决策:认知和心理生物学方法的整合。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jan 27;365(1538):319-30. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0147.
8
The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff.速度-准确性权衡的神经基础。
Trends Neurosci. 2010 Jan;33(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
9
Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.认知控制的自动性:反应抑制范式中的目标启动
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1381-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016645.
10
Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm.在停止信号范式中对反应策略进行主动调整。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):835-54. doi: 10.1037/a0012726.