Suppr超能文献

建筑工人噪声暴露与听力损伤的 10 年前瞻性研究。

10-Year prospective study of noise exposure and hearing damage among construction workers.

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2012 Sep;69(9):643-50. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100578. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To characterise the effects of noise exposure, including intermittent and peaky exposure, on hearing damage as assessed by standard pure-tone thresholds and otoacoustic emissions, a longitudinal study was conducted on newly hired construction apprentices and controls over a 10-year period.

METHODS

Among the 456 subjects recruited at baseline, 316 had at least two (mean 4.6) examinations and were included in this analysis. Annual examinations included hearing threshold levels (HTLs) for air conducted pure tones and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitudes. Task-based occupational noise exposure levels and recreational exposures were estimated. Linear mixed models were fit for HTLs and DPOAEs at 3, 4 and 6 kHz in relation to time since baseline and average noise level since baseline, while controlling for hearing level at baseline and other risk factors.

RESULTS

Estimated L(EQ) noise exposures were 87±3.6 dBA among the construction workers. Linear mixed modelling demonstrated significant exposure-related elevations in HTL of about 2-3 dB over a projected 10-year period at 3, 4 or 6 kHz for a 10 dB increase in exposure. The DPOAE models (using L1=40) predicted about 1 dB decrease in emission amplitude over 10 years for a 10 dB increase in exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides evidence of noise-induced damage at an average exposure level around the 85 dBA level. The predicted change in HTLs was somewhat higher than would be predicted by standard hearing loss models, after accounting for hearing loss at baseline. Limited evidence for an enhanced effect of high peak component noise was observed, and DPOAEs, although similarly affected, showed no advantage over standard hearing threshold evaluation in detecting effects of noise on the ear and hearing.

摘要

目的

通过标准纯音阈值和耳声发射评估,描述噪声暴露(包括间歇性和高峰值暴露)对听力损伤的影响。为此,进行了一项为期 10 年的新入职建筑学徒和对照者的纵向研究。

方法

在基线招募的 456 名受试者中,有 316 名至少进行了两次(平均 4.6 次)检查,纳入本分析。每年的检查包括空气传导纯音听阈和畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)幅度。估计了基于任务的职业噪声暴露水平和娱乐性噪声暴露。线性混合模型用于分析 3、4 和 6 kHz 处的 HTLs 和 DPOAEs 与自基线以来的时间和自基线以来的平均噪声水平的关系,同时控制基线听力水平和其他危险因素。

结果

建筑工人的估计等效连续噪声暴露(L(EQ))为 87±3.6 dBA。线性混合模型显示,在 3、4 或 6 kHz 处,暴露增加 10 dB 时,HTL 会在预测的 10 年内升高约 2-3 dB。对于暴露增加 10 dB,DPOAE 模型(使用 L1=40)预测 10 年内发射幅度降低约 1 dB。

结论

该研究为平均暴露水平在 85 dBA 左右的噪声诱导损伤提供了证据。在考虑基线听力损失的情况下,预测的 HTL 变化略高于标准听力损失模型的预测值。观察到高频峰值噪声增强效应的有限证据,DPOAE 虽然同样受到影响,但在检测噪声对耳朵和听力的影响方面,与标准听力阈值评估相比没有优势。

相似文献

5
Longitudinal changes in hearing threshold levels of noise-exposed construction workers.噪声暴露建筑工人听力阈值水平的纵向变化。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 Jan;88(1):45-60. doi: 10.1007/s00420-014-0932-y. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
6

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Evaluation and comparison of three exposure assessment techniques.三种暴露评估技术的评估与比较。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011 May;8(5):310-23. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.568832.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验