• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论光学变异性、视觉显著性与眼动注视之间的关系:一种计算方法。

On the relationship between optical variability, visual saliency, and eye fixations: a computational approach.

作者信息

Garcia-Diaz Antón, Leborán Víctor, Fdez-Vidal Xosé R, Pardo Xosé M

机构信息

Computer Vision Group, University of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.

出版信息

J Vis. 2012 Jun 12;12(6):17. doi: 10.1167/12.6.17.

DOI:10.1167/12.6.17
PMID:22693335
Abstract

A hierarchical definition of optical variability is proposed that links physical magnitudes to visual saliency and yields a more reductionist interpretation than previous approaches. This definition is shown to be grounded on the classical efficient coding hypothesis. Moreover, we propose that a major goal of contextual adaptation mechanisms is to ensure the invariance of the behavior that the contribution of an image point to optical variability elicits in the visual system. This hypothesis and the necessary assumptions are tested through the comparison with human fixations and state-of-the-art approaches to saliency in three open access eye-tracking datasets, including one devoted to images with faces, as well as in a novel experiment using hyperspectral representations of surface reflectance. The results on faces yield a significant reduction of the potential strength of semantic influences compared to previous works. The results on hyperspectral images support the assumptions to estimate optical variability. As well, the proposed approach explains quantitative results related to a visual illusion observed for images of corners, which does not involve eye movements.

摘要

本文提出了一种光学变异性的层次定义,该定义将物理量与视觉显著性联系起来,并且比以往的方法产生了更简化的解释。事实证明,这一定义基于经典的高效编码假设。此外,我们提出,上下文适应机制的一个主要目标是确保图像点对光学变异性的贡献在视觉系统中引发的行为的不变性。通过与人类注视点以及三个开放获取的眼动追踪数据集中的显著性最新方法进行比较,对这一假设和必要假设进行了测试,其中一个数据集专门用于面部图像,同时还进行了一项使用表面反射率的高光谱表示的新实验。与之前的研究相比,面部图像的结果显著降低了语义影响的潜在强度。高光谱图像的结果支持了估计光学变异性的假设。同样,所提出的方法解释了与观察到的角落图像视觉错觉相关的定量结果,该错觉不涉及眼球运动。

相似文献

1
On the relationship between optical variability, visual saliency, and eye fixations: a computational approach.论光学变异性、视觉显著性与眼动注视之间的关系:一种计算方法。
J Vis. 2012 Jun 12;12(6):17. doi: 10.1167/12.6.17.
2
Eye gaze adaptation under interocular suppression.双眼抑制下的眼动注视适应
J Vis. 2012 Jul 2;12(7):1. doi: 10.1167/12.7.1.
3
Evidence for two distinct mechanisms directing gaze in natural scenes.在自然场景中引导注视的两种不同机制的证据。
J Vis. 2012 Apr 1;12(4):9. doi: 10.1167/12.4.9.
4
A positive correlation between fixation instability and the strength of illusory motion in a static display.在静态显示中,注视不稳定与视错觉运动强度之间存在正相关。
Vision Res. 2006 Jul;46(15):2421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.030. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
5
What stands out in a scene? A study of human explicit saliency judgment.场景中突出的是什么?一项关于人类显性显著性判断的研究。
Vision Res. 2013 Oct 18;91:62-77. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.016. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
6
Quantifying and modeling the strength of motion illusions perceived in static patterns.量化和建模在静态图案中感知到的运动错觉的强度。
J Vis. 2010 Feb 16;10(2):13.1-14. doi: 10.1167/10.2.13.
7
What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition.显著性模型能对眼动做出哪些预测?编码和识别过程中注视的空间和顺序方面。
J Vis. 2008 Feb 20;8(2):6.1-17. doi: 10.1167/8.2.6.
8
Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures.在查看图片时,视觉显著性和语义不一致性会影响眼球运动。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Nov;59(11):1931-49. doi: 10.1080/17470210500416342.
9
Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes.观看动态自然场景时眼球运动的变异性。
J Vis. 2010 Aug 26;10(10):28. doi: 10.1167/10.10.28.
10
On the plausibility of the discriminant center-surround hypothesis for visual saliency.关于视觉显著性的判别性中心-外周假设的合理性
J Vis. 2008 Jun 13;8(7):13.1-18. doi: 10.1167/8.7.13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Visual Integration of Semantic and Spatial Information of Objects in Naturalistic Scenes (VISIONS) database: attentional, conceptual, and perceptual norms.自然场景中物体语义和空间信息的视觉整合(VISIONS)数据库:注意力、概念和感知规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 3;57(1):42. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02535-9.
2
Objects are selected for attention based upon meaning during passive scene viewing.在被动观看场景时,人们会根据意义来选择注意的对象。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1874-1886. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02286-2. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
Abnormalities of the oculomotor function in type 1 diabetes and diabetic neuropathy.
1 型糖尿病和糖尿病性神经病的眼球运动功能异常。
Acta Diabetol. 2022 Sep;59(9):1157-1167. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01911-1. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
Weighting the factors affecting attention guidance during free viewing and visual search: The unexpected role of object recognition uncertainty.权衡自由观看和视觉搜索过程中影响注意力引导的因素:物体识别不确定性的意外作用。
J Vis. 2022 Mar 2;22(4):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.4.13.
5
Semantic object-scene inconsistencies affect eye movements, but not in the way predicted by contextualized meaning maps.语义物体-场景不一致会影响眼球运动,但与语境化意义图谱预测的方式不同。
J Vis. 2022 Feb 1;22(2):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.2.9.
6
Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention.深度显著模型学习低、中、高级特征来预测场景注意力。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 16;11(1):18434. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97879-z.
7
Does task-irrelevant music affect gaze allocation during real-world scene viewing?无关任务的音乐是否会影响现实场景观看中的注视分配?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Dec;28(6):1944-1960. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01947-4. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
Gaze During Locomotion in Virtual Reality and the Real World.虚拟现实和现实世界中运动时的注视
Front Neurosci. 2021 May 24;15:656913. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.656913. eCollection 2021.
9
Salience-based object prioritization during active viewing of naturalistic scenes in young and older adults.在年轻人和老年人主动观看自然场景时,基于显著度的目标优先级排序。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 16;10(1):22057. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78203-7.
10
Can we accurately predict where we look at paintings?我们能准确预测自己看画时的目光落点吗?
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0239980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239980. eCollection 2020.