• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在年轻人和老年人主动观看自然场景时,基于显著度的目标优先级排序。

Salience-based object prioritization during active viewing of naturalistic scenes in young and older adults.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Kiel University, Olshausenstr. 62, 24118, Kiel, Germany.

School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 16;10(1):22057. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78203-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-78203-7
PMID:33328485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7745017/
Abstract

Whether fixation selection in real-world scenes is guided by image salience or by objects has been a matter of scientific debate. To contrast the two views, we compared effects of location-based and object-based visual salience in young and older (65 + years) adults. Generalized linear mixed models were used to assess the unique contribution of salience to fixation selection in scenes. When analysing fixation guidance without recurrence to objects, visual salience predicted whether image patches were fixated or not. This effect was reduced for the elderly, replicating an earlier finding. When using objects as the unit of analysis, we found that highly salient objects were more frequently selected for fixation than objects with low visual salience. Interestingly, this effect was larger for older adults. We also analysed where viewers fixate within objects, once they are selected. A preferred viewing location close to the centre of the object was found for both age groups. The results support the view that objects are important units of saccadic selection. Reconciling the salience view with the object view, we suggest that visual salience contributes to prioritization among objects. Moreover, the data point towards an increasing relevance of object-bound information with increasing age.

摘要

在真实场景中,是基于图像显著度还是基于物体来进行注视选择一直是科学争论的问题。为了对比这两种观点,我们比较了基于位置和基于物体的视觉显著度对年轻和老年(65 岁以上)成年人注视选择的影响。广义线性混合模型用于评估显著度对视场中注视选择的独特贡献。在不考虑物体的情况下分析注视引导时,视觉显著度预测图像块是否被注视。这一效应在老年人中减弱,再现了早期的发现。当将物体作为分析单位时,我们发现高显著度的物体比低视觉显著度的物体更容易被选择进行注视。有趣的是,这一效应在老年人中更大。我们还分析了在选择物体后,观察者在物体内部的注视位置。发现两组观察者都更喜欢将注视点集中在物体的中心附近。结果支持了物体是扫视选择的重要单位的观点。为了调和显著度观点和物体观点,我们认为视觉显著度有助于在物体之间进行优先级排序。此外,数据表明,随着年龄的增长,基于物体的信息的相关性越来越大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/8c1041c8769a/41598_2020_78203_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/b8efa5a174ed/41598_2020_78203_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/73238c26f5b1/41598_2020_78203_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/40d48dfef1a4/41598_2020_78203_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/3a09918a9c89/41598_2020_78203_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/36f8fefc8220/41598_2020_78203_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/2788a28638ad/41598_2020_78203_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/8c1041c8769a/41598_2020_78203_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/b8efa5a174ed/41598_2020_78203_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/73238c26f5b1/41598_2020_78203_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/40d48dfef1a4/41598_2020_78203_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/3a09918a9c89/41598_2020_78203_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/36f8fefc8220/41598_2020_78203_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/2788a28638ad/41598_2020_78203_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/7745017/8c1041c8769a/41598_2020_78203_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Salience-based object prioritization during active viewing of naturalistic scenes in young and older adults.在年轻人和老年人主动观看自然场景时,基于显著度的目标优先级排序。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 16;10(1):22057. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78203-7.
2
Overt attention in natural scenes: objects dominate features.自然场景中的显性注意力:物体主导特征。
Vision Res. 2015 Feb;107:36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
3
Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing.场景观看中基于对象的注意选择。
J Vis. 2010 Jul 1;10(8):20. doi: 10.1167/10.8.20.
4
Object-based saccadic selection during scene perception: evidence from viewing position effects.场景感知过程中基于对象的眼跳选择:来自观看位置效应的证据
J Vis. 2013 Apr 1;13(5):2. doi: 10.1167/13.5.2.
5
Salient object changes influence overt attentional prioritization and object-based targeting in natural scenes.显著物体变化会影响自然场景中的显性注意力优先级和基于物体的目标定位。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 21;12(2):e0172132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172132. eCollection 2017.
6
Attention in natural scenes: Affective-motivational factors guide gaze independently of visual salience.自然场景中的注意力:情感动机因素独立于视觉显著性引导注视。
Vision Res. 2017 Apr;133:161-175. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
7
How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception?检查目的如何影响场景感知中视觉显著性的效力?
Perception. 2007;36(8):1123-38. doi: 10.1068/p5659.
8
Impact of neovascular age-related macular degeneration on eye-movement control during scene viewing: Viewing biases and guidance by visual salience.年龄相关性黄斑变性新生血管对场景观看时眼球运动控制的影响:视觉显著性的观看偏差和引导。
Vision Res. 2022 Dec;201:108105. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108105. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
9
Objects are selected for attention based upon meaning during passive scene viewing.在被动观看场景时,人们会根据意义来选择注意的对象。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1874-1886. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02286-2. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
Visual attention during seeing for speaking in healthy aging.健康老龄化过程中的言语产生时的视觉注意。
Psychol Aging. 2023 Feb;38(1):49-66. doi: 10.1037/pag0000718. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The fundamentals of eye tracking part 2: From research question to operationalization.眼动追踪基础(第二部分):从研究问题到可操作性
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 24;57(2):73. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02590-2.
2
The Visual Integration of Semantic and Spatial Information of Objects in Naturalistic Scenes (VISIONS) database: attentional, conceptual, and perceptual norms.自然场景中物体语义和空间信息的视觉整合(VISIONS)数据库:注意力、概念和感知规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 3;57(1):42. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02535-9.
3
Is a knife the same as a plunger? Comparing the attentional effects of weapons and non-threatening unusual objects in dynamic scenes.

本文引用的文献

1
Meaning maps and saliency models based on deep convolutional neural networks are insensitive to image meaning when predicting human fixations.基于深度卷积神经网络的意义图和显著度模型在预测人类注视时对图像意义不敏感。
Cognition. 2021 Jan;206:104465. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104465. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
Real-world scene perception in infants: What factors guide attention allocation?婴儿对现实世界场景的感知:哪些因素引导注意力分配?
Infancy. 2019 Sep;24(5):693-717. doi: 10.1111/infa.12308. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
Fixation durations in natural scene viewing are guided by peripheral scene content.
刀和柱塞一样吗?在动态场景中比较武器和非威胁性异常物体的注意力效应。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Oct 8;9(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00579-1.
4
Objects guide human gaze behavior in dynamic real-world scenes.物体在动态真实场景中引导人类的注视行为。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Oct 26;19(10):e1011512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011512. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Multisensory perception constrains the formation of object categories: a review of evidence from sensory-driven and predictive processes on categorical decisions.多感官知觉约束了物体类别的形成:来自感觉驱动和预测过程的关于类别决策的证据综述。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Sep 25;378(1886):20220342. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0342. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
6
Free viewing biases for complex scenes in preschoolers and adults.幼儿和成人对复杂场景的自由观看偏好。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 21;13(1):11803. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38854-8.
7
Objects are selected for attention based upon meaning during passive scene viewing.在被动观看场景时,人们会根据意义来选择注意的对象。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1874-1886. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02286-2. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
8
Similar mechanisms of temporary bindings for identity and location of objects in healthy ageing: an eye-tracking study with naturalistic scenes.健康衰老过程中对物体的身份和位置的暂时性绑定的相似机制:使用自然场景的眼动追踪研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 1;12(1):11163. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13559-6.
9
Searching for meaning: Local scene semantics guide attention during natural visual search in scenes.寻找意义:局部场景语义在场景自然视觉搜索中引导注意力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):632-648. doi: 10.1177/17470218221101334. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
10
Meaning and expected surfaces combine to guide attention during visual search in scenes.意义和预期表面结合起来指导场景中视觉搜索时的注意力。
J Vis. 2021 Oct 5;21(11):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.11.1.
在自然场景观看中,注视持续时间受到周围场景内容的引导。
J Vis. 2020 Apr 9;20(4):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.4.15.
4
Eye Movements in Real-World Scene Photographs: General Characteristics and Effects of Viewing Task.现实场景照片中的眼球运动:观看任务的一般特征及影响
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 14;10:2915. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02915. eCollection 2019.
5
Effects of Normative Aging on Eye Movements during Reading.正常衰老对阅读过程中眼动的影响。
Vision (Basel). 2020 Jan 14;4(1):7. doi: 10.3390/vision4010007.
6
Fixation-related Brain Potentials during Semantic Integration of Object-Scene Information.对象-场景信息语义整合过程中的与固定相关的脑电位。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Apr;32(4):571-589. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01504. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
Meaning and Attentional Guidance in Scenes: A Review of the Meaning Map Approach.场景中的意义与注意力引导:意义地图方法综述
Vision (Basel). 2019 May 10;3(2):19. doi: 10.3390/vision3020019.
8
Individual differences in visual salience vary along semantic dimensions.个体间在视觉显著性上的差异会沿着语义维度发生变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 11;116(24):11687-11692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820553116. Epub 2019 May 28.
9
Meaning-based guidance of attention in scenes as revealed by meaning maps.语义地图揭示的场景中基于意义的注意力引导
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;1(10):743-747. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0208-0. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
10
Is there a shape to the attention spotlight? Computing saliency over proto-objects predicts fixations during scene viewing.注意力焦点有形状吗?基于原型对象计算显著性可预测场景观看过程中的注视点。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jan;45(1):139-154. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000593.