Department of Food Science, Chenoweth Laboratory, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2012;52(9):830-51. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.667460.
The Arrhenius equation has been widely used as a model of the temperature effect on the rate of chemical reactions and biological processes in foods. Since the model requires that the rate increase monotonically with temperature, its applicability to enzymatic reactions and microbial growth, which have optimal temperature, is obviously limited. This is also true for microbial inactivation and chemical reactions that only start at an elevated temperature, and for complex processes and reactions that do not follow fixed order kinetics, that is, where the isothermal rate constant, however defined, is a function of both temperature and time. The linearity of the Arrhenius plot, that is, Ln[k(T)] vs. 1/T where T is in °K has been traditionally considered evidence of the model's validity. Consequently, the slope of the plot has been used to calculate the reaction or processes' "energy of activation," usually without independent verification. Many experimental and simulated rate constant vs. temperature relationships that yield linear Arrhenius plots can also be described by the simpler exponential model Ln[k(T)/k(T(reference))] = c(T-T(reference)). The use of the exponential model or similar empirical alternative would eliminate the confusing temperature axis inversion, the unnecessary compression of the temperature scale, and the need for kinetic assumptions that are hard to affirm in food systems. It would also eliminate the reference to the Universal gas constant in systems where a "mole" cannot be clearly identified. Unless proven otherwise by independent experiments, one cannot dismiss the notion that the apparent linearity of the Arrhenius plot in many food systems is due to a mathematical property of the model's equation rather than to the existence of a temperature independent "energy of activation." If T+273.16°C in the Arrhenius model's equation is replaced by T+b, where the numerical value of the arbitrary constant b is substantially larger than T and T(reference), the plot of Ln k(T) vs. 1/(T+b) will always appear almost perfectly linear. Both the modified Arrhenius model version having the arbitrary constant b, Ln[k(T)/k(T(reference)) = a[1/ (T(reference)+b)-1/ (T+b)], and the exponential model can faithfully describe temperature dependencies traditionally described by the Arrhenius equation without the assumption of a temperature independent "energy of activation." This is demonstrated mathematically and with computer simulations, and with reprocessed classical kinetic data and published food results.
阿仑尼乌斯方程已被广泛应用于描述食品中化学反应和生物过程的温度效应模型。由于该模型要求速率随温度单调增加,因此其适用于具有最佳温度的酶反应和微生物生长显然是有限的。对于仅在高温下开始的微生物失活动力学和化学反应,对于不遵循固定顺序动力学的复杂过程和反应,即无论如何定义等温速率常数都是温度和时间的函数,情况也是如此。阿仑尼乌斯图的线性,即 Ln[k(T)] 对 1/T,其中 T 以 °K 表示,传统上被认为是该模型有效性的证据。因此,该图的斜率被用于计算反应或过程的“活化能”,通常无需独立验证。许多产生线性阿仑尼乌斯图的实验和模拟速率常数与温度关系也可以用更简单的指数模型 Ln[k(T)/k(T(reference))] = c(T-T(reference))来描述。使用指数模型或类似的经验替代方案将消除混淆的温度轴反转、不必要的温度刻度压缩以及在食品系统中难以肯定的动力学假设的需要。它还将消除在无法明确识别“摩尔”的系统中对通用气体常数的引用。除非通过独立实验证明,否则不能排除这样的观点,即在许多食品系统中阿仑尼乌斯图的明显线性是由于模型方程的数学性质,而不是由于存在独立于温度的“活化能”。如果阿仑尼乌斯模型方程中的 T+273.16°C 被 T+b 替换,其中任意常数 b 的数值远大于 T 和 T(reference),则 Ln k(T) 对 1/(T+b)的图将始终看起来几乎完全线性。具有任意常数 b 的修改后的阿仑尼乌斯模型版本 Ln[k(T)/k(T(reference)) = a[1/ (T(reference)+b)-1/ (T+b)],以及指数模型都可以忠实地描述传统上由阿仑尼乌斯方程描述的温度依赖性,而无需假设独立于温度的“活化能”。这通过数学和计算机模拟以及再处理的经典动力学数据和已发表的食品结果进行了演示。