Suppr超能文献

种族问题不容忽视:一项针对辅助生殖技术协会报告结果的种族/民族差异的系统综述。

Race matters: a systematic review of racial/ethnic disparity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported outcomes.

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35249-7333, USA.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2012 Aug;98(2):406-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the reporting of race/ethnicity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) Clinic Outcome Reporting System (CORS) publications.

DESIGN

Systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology of literature published in PubMed on race/ethnicity that includes data from SART CORS.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S): Not applicable.

INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization cycles reported to SART.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Any outcomes reported in SART CORS.

RESULT(S): Seven publications were identified that assessed racial/ethnic disparities in IVF outcomes using SART data. All reported a racial/ethnic disparity. However, more than 35% of cycles were excluded from analysis because of missing race/ethnicity data.

CONCLUSION(S): Review of current publications of SART data suggests significant racial/ethnic disparities in IVF outcomes. However, the potential for selection bias limits confidence in these findings, given that fewer than 65% of SART reported cycles include race/ethnicity. Our understanding of how race/ethnicity influences ART outcome could be greatly improved if information on race/ethnicity was available for all reported cycles.

摘要

目的

系统地回顾社会辅助生殖技术协会(SART)临床结果报告系统(CORS)出版物中关于种族/民族的报告情况。

设计

采用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法,对发表在 PubMed 上的有关 SART CORS 种族/民族数据的文献进行系统性综述。

设置

不适用。

患者

不适用。

干预措施

向 SART 报告的体外受精周期。

主要观察指标

SART CORS 报告的任何结果。

结果

确定了 7 篇评估使用 SART 数据的 IVF 结果种族/民族差异的出版物。所有报告均显示存在种族/民族差异。然而,由于种族/民族数据缺失,超过 35%的周期被排除在分析之外。

结论

对 SART 数据现有出版物的审查表明,IVF 结果存在显著的种族/民族差异。然而,由于只有不到 65%的 SART 报告周期包含种族/民族信息,因此选择偏差的可能性限制了对这些发现的信心。如果所有报告的周期都能提供有关种族/民族的信息,我们对种族/民族如何影响辅助生殖技术结果的理解将会大大提高。

相似文献

5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

5
Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.医学辅助生殖中的不平等:范围综述。
Reprod Sci. 2023 Aug;30(8):2373-2396. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
8
The Future of Assisted Reproductive Technology Live Births in the United States.美国辅助生殖技术活产的未来。
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022;41(5):2289-2309. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09731-5. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
10
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Fertility Awareness Among Reproductive-Aged Women.生育年龄女性生育意识中的种族和民族差异
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2021 Aug 19;2(1):347-354. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0034. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

8
Does ethnicity influence in vitro fertilization (IVF) birth outcomes?种族会影响体外受精(IVF)的分娩结局吗?
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.055. Epub 2008 Aug 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验