Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35249-7333, USA.
Fertil Steril. 2012 Aug;98(2):406-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
To systematically review the reporting of race/ethnicity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) Clinic Outcome Reporting System (CORS) publications.
Systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology of literature published in PubMed on race/ethnicity that includes data from SART CORS.
Not applicable.
PATIENT(S): Not applicable.
INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization cycles reported to SART.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Any outcomes reported in SART CORS.
RESULT(S): Seven publications were identified that assessed racial/ethnic disparities in IVF outcomes using SART data. All reported a racial/ethnic disparity. However, more than 35% of cycles were excluded from analysis because of missing race/ethnicity data.
CONCLUSION(S): Review of current publications of SART data suggests significant racial/ethnic disparities in IVF outcomes. However, the potential for selection bias limits confidence in these findings, given that fewer than 65% of SART reported cycles include race/ethnicity. Our understanding of how race/ethnicity influences ART outcome could be greatly improved if information on race/ethnicity was available for all reported cycles.
系统地回顾社会辅助生殖技术协会(SART)临床结果报告系统(CORS)出版物中关于种族/民族的报告情况。
采用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法,对发表在 PubMed 上的有关 SART CORS 种族/民族数据的文献进行系统性综述。
不适用。
不适用。
向 SART 报告的体外受精周期。
SART CORS 报告的任何结果。
确定了 7 篇评估使用 SART 数据的 IVF 结果种族/民族差异的出版物。所有报告均显示存在种族/民族差异。然而,由于种族/民族数据缺失,超过 35%的周期被排除在分析之外。
对 SART 数据现有出版物的审查表明,IVF 结果存在显著的种族/民族差异。然而,由于只有不到 65%的 SART 报告周期包含种族/民族信息,因此选择偏差的可能性限制了对这些发现的信心。如果所有报告的周期都能提供有关种族/民族的信息,我们对种族/民族如何影响辅助生殖技术结果的理解将会大大提高。