Department of Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
J Hazard Mater. 2012 Aug 15;227-228:418-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.070. Epub 2012 May 5.
Tungsten carbide (WC) and cobalt (Co) are constituents of hard metals and are used for the production of extremely hard tools. Previous studies have identified greater cytotoxic potential of WC-based nanoparticles if particles contained Co. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and micronuclei would help explain the impact on cultured mammalian cells by three different tungsten-based nanoparticles (WC(S), WC(L), WC(L)-Co (S: small; L: large)). The selection of particles allowed us to study the influence of particle properties, e.g. surface area, and the presence of Co on the toxicological results. WC(S) and WC(L)/WC(L)-Co differed in their crystalline structure and surface area, whereas WC(S)/WC(L) and WC(L)-Co differed in their cobalt content. WC(L) and WC(L)-Co showed neither a genotoxic potential nor ROS induction. Contrary to that, WC(S) nanoparticles induced the formation of both ROS and micronuclei. CoCl(2) was tested in relevant concentrations and induced no ROS formation, but increased the rate of micronuclei at concentrations exceeding those present in WC(L)-Co. In conclusion, ROS and micronuclei formation could not be associated with the presence of Co in the WC-based particles. The contrasting responses elicited by WC(S) vs. WC(L) appear to be due to large differences in crystalline structure.
碳化钨(WC)和钴(Co)是硬质合金的组成部分,用于制造极硬的工具。先前的研究已经确定,如果颗粒中含有 Co,基于 WC 的纳米颗粒具有更大的细胞毒性潜力。本研究的目的是研究三种不同的基于钨的纳米颗粒(WC(S)、WC(L)、WC(L)-Co(S:小;L:大))是否会通过形成活性氧物种(ROS)和微核来帮助解释对培养的哺乳动物细胞的影响。选择颗粒使我们能够研究颗粒特性(例如表面积)和 Co 的存在对毒理学结果的影响。WC(S)和 WC(L)/WC(L)-Co 的晶体结构和表面积不同,而 WC(S)/WC(L)和 WC(L)-Co 的钴含量不同。WC(L)和 WC(L)-Co 既没有遗传毒性潜力,也没有诱导 ROS 形成。相反,WC(S)纳米颗粒诱导了 ROS 和微核的形成。CoCl2 在相关浓度下进行了测试,没有诱导 ROS 形成,但在 Co 存在于 WC(L)-Co 中的浓度以上增加了微核的形成率。总之,ROS 和微核的形成不能与 WC 基颗粒中 Co 的存在联系起来。WC(S)与 WC(L)引起的相反反应似乎是由于晶体结构的巨大差异造成的。