Suppr超能文献

在接受冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术的患者中,有和没有糖尿病的患者的冠心病患病率、程度、严重程度和预后存在差异:来自 CONFIRM(冠状动脉 CT 血管造影评估用于临床结果)的 10110 名国际多中心登记研究结果。

Differences in prevalence, extent, severity, and prognosis of coronary artery disease among patients with and without diabetes undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: results from 10,110 individuals from the CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes): an InteRnational Multicenter Registry.

机构信息

Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2012 Aug;35(8):1787-94. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2403. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We examined the prevalence, extent, severity, and prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in individuals with and without diabetes (DM) who are similar in CAD risk factors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We identified 23,643 consecutive individuals without known CAD undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography. A total of 3,370 DM individuals were propensity matched in a 1-to-2 fashion to 6,740 unique non-DM individuals. CAD was defined as none, nonobstructive (1-49% stenosis), or obstructive (≥ 50% stenosis). All-cause mortality was assessed by risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

At a 2.2-year follow-up, 108 (3.2%) and 115 (1.7%) deaths occurred among DM and non-DM individuals, respectively. Compared with non-DM individuals, DM individuals possessed higher rates of obstructive CAD (37 vs. 27%) and lower rates of having normal arteries (28 vs. 36%) (P < 0.0001). CAD extent was higher for DM versus non-DM individuals for obstructive one-vessel disease (19 vs. 14%), two-vessel disease (9 vs. 7%), and three-vessel disease (9 vs. 5%) (P < 0.0001 for comparison), with higher per-segment stenosis in the proximal and mid-segments of every coronary artery (P < 0.001 for all). Compared with non-DM individuals with no CAD, risk of mortality for DM individuals was higher for those with no CAD (hazard ratio 3.63 [95% CI 1.67-7.91]; P = 0.001), nonobstructive CAD (5.25 [2.56-10.8]; P < 0.001), one-vessel disease (6.39 [2.98-13.7]; P < 0.0001), two-vessel disease (12.33 [5.622-27.1]; P < 0.0001), and three-vessel disease (13.25 [6.15-28.6]; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with matched non-DM individuals, DM individuals possess higher prevalence, extent, and severity of CAD. At comparable levels of CAD, DM individuals experience higher risk of mortality compared with non-DM individuals.

摘要

目的

我们研究了在患有和不患有糖尿病(DM)的个体中,具有相似冠心病(CAD)危险因素的个体中 CAD 的流行率、程度、严重程度和预后。

研究设计和方法

我们确定了 23643 名无已知 CAD 病史的连续个体,进行了冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术。共有 3370 名 DM 个体以 1:2 的比例与 6740 名独特的非 DM 个体进行了倾向匹配。CAD 定义为无 CAD、非阻塞性(1-49%狭窄)或阻塞性(≥50%狭窄)。通过风险调整的 Cox 比例风险模型评估全因死亡率。

结果

在 2.2 年的随访中,DM 组和非 DM 组分别有 108 例(3.2%)和 115 例(1.7%)死亡。与非 DM 个体相比,DM 个体具有更高的阻塞性 CAD 发生率(37%比 27%)和更低的正常动脉发生率(28%比 36%)(P <0.0001)。DM 个体的阻塞性单支病变(19%比 14%)、两支病变(9%比 7%)和三支病变(9%比 5%)的 CAD 程度更高(与比较,每支冠状动脉的近端和中段的每段狭窄程度均较高(P <0.001)。与无 CAD 的非 DM 个体相比,无 CAD(危险比 3.63 [95%CI 1.67-7.91];P = 0.001)、非阻塞性 CAD(5.25 [2.56-10.8];P <0.001)、单支病变(6.39 [2.98-13.7];P <0.0001)、两支病变(12.33 [5.622-27.1];P <0.0001)和三支病变(13.25 [6.15-28.6];P <0.0001)的 DM 个体的死亡率风险更高。

结论

与匹配的非 DM 个体相比,DM 个体具有更高的 CAD 流行率、程度和严重程度。在 CAD 程度相同时,DM 个体的死亡率风险高于非 DM 个体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e903/3402246/a1374bcd5469/1787fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验