• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis of lymph node metastasis rate for patients with thoracic oesophageal cancer and its implication in delineation of clinical target volume for radiation therapy.胸段食管癌患者淋巴结转移率的荟萃分析及其对放射治疗临床靶区勾画的意义。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):e1110-9. doi: 10.1259/bjr/12500248. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
2
The pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.胸段食管鳞癌的淋巴转移模式和流行率。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Sep;36(3):480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.056. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
3
Pattern of lymph node metastases and its implication in radiotherapeutic clinical target volume in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A report of 1077 cases.胸段食管鳞癌淋巴结转移规律及其对放疗临床靶区的影响:1077 例报告。
Radiother Oncol. 2010 May;95(2):229-33. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
4
Effect of bilateral supraclavicular postoperative radiotherapy in middle and lower thoracic esophageal carcinoma.双侧锁骨上区术后放疗对胸段中下段食管癌的疗效
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 21;20(47):17970-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17970.
5
A strategy for determining which thoracic esophageal cancer patients should undergo cervical lymph node dissection.一种确定哪些胸段食管癌患者应接受颈部淋巴结清扫术的策略。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Nov;80(5):1881-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.051.
6
Pattern of lymph node metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy.接受三野淋巴结清扫术的胸段食管癌患者的淋巴结转移模式
Eur Surg Res. 2007;39(1):1-6. doi: 10.1159/000096925. Epub 2006 Nov 10.
7
[Analysis of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with single lymph node metastasis].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014 Nov;41(12):2000-2.
8
[Selective three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous carcinoma].[胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的选择性三野淋巴结清扫术]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Sep;9(5):388-91.
9
[Clinical outcomes and selection conditions of three-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[胸段食管鳞状细胞癌三野淋巴结清扫的临床疗效及选择条件]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Mar;34(3):212-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.03.012.
10
The pattern of cervical lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma may affect the target decision for definitive radiotherapy.胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的颈部淋巴结转移模式可能会影响根治性放疗的靶区确定。
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Jun;123(3):382-386. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Small bowel metastasis during organ preservation in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: case report and literature review.食管鳞状细胞癌患者器官保留期间的小肠转移:病例报告及文献综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;15:1560011. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1560011. eCollection 2025.
2
Beyond the common recurrence sites after esophagectomy: colonic metastasis in esophageal cancer.食管癌切除术后常见复发部位之外:结肠癌转移至食管癌
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s12328-025-02164-5.
3
Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in esophageal carcinoma: a topic of ongoing controversy.食管癌锁骨上淋巴结转移:一个仍在争论的话题。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 27;15:1527625. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1527625. eCollection 2025.
4
Clinical value of station 4R node dissection in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞癌 4R 区淋巴结清扫的临床价值。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec 18;21(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03280-7.
5
The Prognostic Value of Sequential F-FDG PET/CT Metabolic Parameters in Outcomes of Upper-Third Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Definitive Chemoradiotherapy.序贯F-FDG PET/CT代谢参数对接受根治性放化疗的食管上段鳞状细胞癌患者预后的价值
World J Nucl Med. 2023 Sep 13;22(3):226-233. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1774417. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Mechanisms of esophageal cancer metastasis and treatment progress.食管癌转移的机制与治疗进展。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jun 8;14:1206504. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1206504. eCollection 2023.
7
Prognostic nomogram and risk factors for predicting survival in patients with pT2N0M0 esophageal squamous carcinoma.预测 T2N0M0 期食管鳞癌患者生存的预后列线图和危险因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 26;13(1):4931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32171-w.
8
Pretreatment F-FDG PET/CT-Derived Parameters in Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Locally Advanced Upper Third Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy.治疗前F-FDG PET/CT衍生参数在预测局部晚期上段食管鳞状细胞癌根治性放化疗后的临床结局中的应用
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug;56(4):181-187. doi: 10.1007/s13139-022-00751-9. Epub 2022 May 10.
9
Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy with Total Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy: A Guide to a Systematic Approach Using the Concept of Fascial Plane Dissection.机器人辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术联合全纵隔淋巴结清扫术:基于筋膜平面解剖概念的系统方法指南
J Chest Surg. 2021 Aug 5;54(4):294-301. doi: 10.5090/jcs.21.065.
10
Pattern of Recurrence in 428 Patients With Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Radical Surgery and Its Implication in Postoperative Radiotherapeutic Clinical Target Volume.428例胸段食管鳞状细胞癌根治术后复发模式及其对术后放射治疗临床靶区体积的影响
Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 15;11:652365. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652365. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics.全球癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
2
Number and location of positive nodes, postoperative radiotherapy, and survival after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.胸段食管鳞癌三野淋巴结清扫术后阳性淋巴结数目和部位、术后放疗与生存
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.037. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
3
[Characteristics of the lymph node metastases and influencing factors and their value in target region delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma].[胸段食管癌术后放疗中淋巴结转移特征、影响因素及其在靶区勾画中的价值]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2010 May;32(5):391-5.
4
Pattern of lymph node metastases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the anatomical lymphatic drainage system.基于解剖性淋巴引流系统的食管鳞癌淋巴结转移模式。
Dis Esophagus. 2011 Jan;24(1):33-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01086.x.
5
Pattern of relapse in surgical treated patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its possible impact on target delineation for postoperative radiotherapy.手术治疗的胸段食管鳞癌患者的复发模式及其对术后放疗靶区勾画的可能影响。
Radiother Oncol. 2010 Jul;96(1):104-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.04.029. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
6
Pattern of lymph node metastases and its implication in radiotherapeutic clinical target volume in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A report of 1077 cases.胸段食管鳞癌淋巴结转移规律及其对放疗临床靶区的影响:1077 例报告。
Radiother Oncol. 2010 May;95(2):229-33. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
7
The pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.胸段食管鳞癌的淋巴转移模式和流行率。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Sep;36(3):480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.056. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
8
Adjuvant radiotherapy after modified Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: can it prevent lymph node recurrence of the mid-thoracic esophageal carcinoma?改良Ivor-Lewis食管癌切除术后的辅助放疗:它能预防胸段中段食管癌的淋巴结复发吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jun;87(6):1697-702. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.060.
9
Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: the pattern of metastatic lymph node dissemination as a rationale for elective lymphatic target volume definition.食管胃交界腺癌:转移性淋巴结扩散模式作为选择性淋巴引流靶区定义的理论依据
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Apr 1;70(5):1408-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.053.
10
[Regulations and lymphadenectomy strategy of mediastinal and upper abdominal lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma].[胸段食管癌纵隔及上腹部淋巴结转移的相关规定及淋巴结清扫策略]
Ai Zheng. 2007 Sep;26(9):1020-4.

胸段食管癌患者淋巴结转移率的荟萃分析及其对放射治疗临床靶区勾画的意义。

A meta-analysis of lymph node metastasis rate for patients with thoracic oesophageal cancer and its implication in delineation of clinical target volume for radiation therapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):e1110-9. doi: 10.1259/bjr/12500248. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1259/bjr/12500248
PMID:22700258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3500810/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to pool the lymph node metastasis rate (LNMR) in patients with thoracic oesophageal cancer (TOC) and to determine which node level should be included when undergoing radiation therapy.

METHODS

Qualified studies were identified on Medline, Embase, CBM and the Cochrane Library through to the end of April 2011. Pooled estimates of LNMR were obtained through a random-effect model. Possible effect modifiers which might lead to the statistical heterogeneity were identified through meta-regression, and further subgroup analyses of factors influencing LNMR were performed.

RESULTS

45 observational studies with a total of 18 415 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimates of LNMR in upper, middle and lower TOC were 30.7%, 16.8% and 11.0% cervical, 42.0%, 21.1% and 10.5% upper mediastinal, 12.9%, 28.1% and 19.6% middle mediastinal, 2.6%, 7.8% and 23.0% lower mediastinal, and 9%, 21.4% and 39.9% abdominal, respectively. Lymph node metastasis most frequently happened to paratracheal, paraoesophageal, perigastric 106recR and station 7. The most obvious difference (≥15%) of LNMR between two-field and three-field lymphatic dissection occurred in cervical, paratracheal, 106recR and 108.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the meta-analysis, more useful information was obtained about clinical target volume (CTV) delineation of TOC patients treated with radiotherapy. However, our study is predominantly a description of squamous carcinoma and the results may not be valid for adenocarcinoma.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在汇总胸段食管鳞癌(胸段食管癌)患者的淋巴结转移率(LNM),并确定在接受放疗时应包括哪些淋巴结水平。

方法

通过 Medline、Embase、CBM 和 Cochrane 图书馆检索 2011 年 4 月底前的合格研究。通过随机效应模型获得 LNM 的汇总估计值。通过荟萃回归识别可能导致统计学异质性的可能的效应修饰因子,并进一步进行影响 LNM 的因素的亚组分析。

结果

纳入了 45 项观察性研究,共计 18415 例患者。汇总分析显示,胸段食管癌颈段、中上段和中下段的 LNM 率分别为 30.7%、16.8%和 11.0%、42.0%、21.1%和 10.5%、12.9%、28.1%和 19.6%、2.6%、7.8%和 23.0%、9%、21.4%和 39.9%。淋巴结转移最常发生于气管旁、食管旁、胃周 106recR 和站 7。二野和三野淋巴结清扫之间 LNM 率差异最明显(≥15%)的部位是颈段、气管旁、106recR 和 108。

结论

通过荟萃分析,获得了关于接受放疗的胸段食管癌患者的临床靶区(CTV)勾画的更有用的信息。然而,本研究主要是对鳞癌的描述,结果可能不适用于腺癌。