Global Health Outcomes, WS2E85, 1 Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 08889, USA,
Diabetes Ther. 2012 Nov;3(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s13300-012-0005-8. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
To identify reasons why primary care physicians (PCPs) do not treat older patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with antihyperglycemic agents following diagnosis.
US PCPs were surveyed via the internet regarding their reasons for not treating patients aged >65 years diagnosed with T2DM and had not yet initiated antihyperglycemic therapy for ≥6 months after diagnosis. PCPs were requested to provide relevant clinical information for untreated older patients and select applicable reasons for not initiating treatment from a list of 35 possibilities, grouped into five categories.
A total of 508 PCPs completed the online survey and provided complete clinical data for 770 patients. The reasons provided by the first-ranked physician for not initiating antihyperglycemic therapy were related to diet and exercise (57.5%); mild hyperglycemia (23.8%); patient's concerns (13.4%); concerns about antihyperglycemic agents (3.0%); and comorbidities and polypharmacy (2.3%). The "diet and exercise" category was the most common first-ranked non-treatment reason, regardless of recent hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) stratum. Reasons within the "patient's concerns," "concerns related to antihyperglycemic agents," and "comorbidities and polypharmacy" categories tended to be selected more often as first-ranked reasons by physicians for patients with higher HbA(1c) values. Of the 158 patients whose physicians planned to initiate antihyperglycemic therapy within the next month, 54.4% already had a most recent HbA(1c) value above their physician-stated threshold for treatment initiation.
In the PCPs studied, there was a tendency to select appropriate reasons for non-treatment with antihyperglycemic agents given their patients' glycemic status. However, there was inertia related to the initiation of pharmacological therapy in some older patients with newly diagnosed T2DM. Important factors included physicians' perceptions of "mild" hyperglycemia and the HbA(1c) threshold for using antihyperglycemic agents.
为了明确初级保健医生(PCP)在诊断后为何不为新诊断为 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)且≥6 个月未接受抗高血糖药物治疗的老年患者开具此类药物。
通过互联网对美国 PCP 进行调查,了解他们不为年龄>65 岁且新诊断为 T2DM 且诊断后≥6 个月尚未开始抗高血糖治疗的患者开具此类药物的原因。PCP 被要求为未接受治疗的老年患者提供相关临床信息,并从 35 个可能性中选择 5 个类别中的适用原因,以不启动治疗。
共有 508 名 PCP 完成了在线调查,并为 770 名患者提供了完整的临床数据。排名第一的医生不启动抗高血糖治疗的原因与饮食和运动(57.5%)、轻度高血糖(23.8%)、患者关注(13.4%)、抗高血糖药物相关担忧(3.0%)以及合并症和多种药物治疗(2.3%)相关。“饮食和运动”是最常见的第一非治疗原因,与近期糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平无关。“患者关注”、“抗高血糖药物相关担忧”和“合并症和多种药物治疗”类别的原因更倾向于被医生作为 HbA1c 水平较高患者的第一选择。在计划在下个月开始抗高血糖治疗的 158 名患者中,54.4%的患者最近一次 HbA1c 值已高于其医生设定的治疗起始阈值。
在研究的 PCP 中,根据患者的血糖状况,他们有选择合适的不使用抗高血糖药物治疗的理由。然而,在一些新诊断为 T2DM 的老年患者中,开始药物治疗存在一定惰性。重要因素包括医生对“轻度”高血糖和使用抗高血糖药物的 HbA1c 阈值的看法。