Suppr超能文献

评估三种酶免疫分析法和环介导等温扩增检测技术在艰难梭菌感染实验室诊断中的应用。

Evaluation of three enzyme immunoassays and a loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

机构信息

Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Isala klinieken, Stilobadstraat 3, 8021AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;31(11):3035-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1658-y. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

Abstract

The laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) consists of the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile, and/or its toxins A or B in stool preferably in a two-step algorithm. In a prospective study, we compared the performance of three toxin enzyme immunoassays (EIAs)-ImmunoCard Toxins A & B, Premier Toxins A & B and C. diff Quik Chek Complete, which combines a toxins test and a glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) antigen EIA in one device -and the loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay Illumigene C. difficile. In total 986 stool samples were analyzed. Compared with toxigenic culture as the gold standard, sensitivities, specificities, PPV and NPV values of the toxin EIAs were 41.1-54.8 %, 98.9-100 %, 75.0-100 % and 95.5-96.5 % respectively, of the Illumigene assay 93.3 %, 99.7 %, 95.8 % and 99.5 %. Illumigene assays performed significantly better for non-014/020 PCR-ribotypes than for C. difficile isolates belonging to 014/020. Discrepant analysis of three culture-negative, but Illumigene-positive samples, revealed the presence of toxin genes using real-time PCRs. In addition to the GDH EIA (NPV of 99.8 %), the performance of Illumigene allows this test to be introduced as a first screening test for CDI- or as a confirmation test for GDH -positive samples, although the initial invalid Illumigene result of 4.4 % is a point of concern.

摘要

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的实验室诊断包括检测粪便中的产毒艰难梭菌,以及(或)其毒素 A 或 B,最好采用两步法。在一项前瞻性研究中,我们比较了三种毒素酶免疫分析法(EIAs)——ImmunoCard Toxins A & B、Premier Toxins A & B 和 C. diff Quik Chek Complete(一种将毒素检测和谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)抗原 EIA 结合在一个设备中的检测方法),以及环介导等温扩增检测法 Illumigene C. difficile。共分析了 986 份粪便样本。与产毒培养作为金标准相比,毒素 EIAs 的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 值分别为 41.1-54.8%、98.9-100%、75.0-100%和 95.5-96.5%,Illumigene 检测法的敏感性为 93.3%、特异性为 99.7%、PPV 为 95.8%和 NPV 为 99.5%。Illumigene 检测法对非 014/020 PCR-ribotypes 的检测效果明显优于对属于 014/020 的艰难梭菌分离株的检测效果。对 3 份培养阴性但 Illumigene 阳性的样本进行不一致性分析后,使用实时 PCR 检测到了毒素基因的存在。除了 GDH EIA(NPV 为 99.8%)外,Illumigene 的性能使得该检测方法可以作为 CDI 的初筛检测方法,或作为 GDH 阳性样本的确认检测方法,尽管其初始无效 Illumigene 结果为 4.4%是一个值得关注的问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验