Suppr超能文献

粪便检测疑似 () 感染患者的胃肠道病原体面板免疫测定评估。

Evaluation of a Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel Immunoassay in Stool Testing of Patients with Suspected () Infection.

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00710-19. Print 2019 Oct.

Abstract

() infection (CDI) is the most common causative pathogen of health care-associated gastrointestinal infections; however, due to the overlap of clinical symptoms with those of other causes of acute gastroenteritis, the selection of the most appropriate laboratory test is difficult. From April to October 2018, 640 stool samples requested for CDI testing were examined using the mariPOC CDI and Gastro test (ArcDia), which allows the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B, norovirus genogroups GI and GII.4, rotavirus, adenovirus, and spp. In parallel, the C. Diff Quik Chek Complete test (Alere) was used as a routine diagnostic assay, and toxigenic culture was used as a reference method. The sensitivity of the mariPOC CDI and Gastro test was comparable to that of C. Diff Quik Chek Complete for the detection of GDH (96.40% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 91.81% to 98.82%] versus 95.68% [95% CI, 90.84 to 98.40%];  = 1.00) and was higher for the detection of toxin A/B (66.67% [95% CI, 57.36 to 75.11%] versus 55.56% [95% CI, 46.08 to 64.74%];  = 0.00). The specificity of the mariPOC CDI and Gastro test was lower than that of C. Diff Quik Chek Complete for GDH detection (95.21% [95% CI, 92.96% to 96.91%] versus 97.60% [95% CI, 95.85% to 98.76%];  = 0.04) and comparable to that of C. Diff Quik Chek Complete for toxin A/B detection (99.24 [95% CI, 98.05% to 99.79%] versus 99.81% [95% CI, 98.94% to 100.0%];  = 0.37). In 29 cases (4.53%), other causative agents of diarrhea were detected ( spp. [ = 17], rotavirus [ = 7], and norovirus genogroup GII.4 [ = 5]).

摘要

()感染(CDI)是最常见的医源性胃肠道感染病原体;然而,由于其临床症状与其他急性胃肠炎的病因重叠,因此很难选择最合适的实验室检测方法。2018 年 4 月至 10 月,我们使用 mariPOC CDI 和 Gastro 试验(ArcDia)检测了 640 份要求进行 CDI 检测的粪便样本,该试验可同时检测谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)和毒素 A/B、诺如病毒基因组 GI 和 GII.4、轮状病毒、腺病毒和 spp。同时,我们使用 C. Diff Quik Chek Complete 试验(Alere)作为常规诊断检测方法,并用产毒培养作为参考方法。mariPOC CDI 和 Gastro 试验检测 GDH 的灵敏度与 C. Diff Quik Chek Complete 检测方法相当(96.40%[95%置信区间{CI},91.81%至 98.82%]与 95.68%[95%CI,90.84%至 98.40%];  = 1.00),检测毒素 A/B 的灵敏度更高(66.67%[95%CI,57.36%至 75.11%]与 55.56%[95%CI,46.08%至 64.74%];  = 0.00)。mariPOC CDI 和 Gastro 试验检测 GDH 的特异性低于 C. Diff Quik Chek Complete 检测方法(95.21%[95%CI,92.96%至 96.91%]与 97.60%[95%CI,95.85%至 98.76%];  = 0.04),检测毒素 A/B 的特异性与 C. Diff Quik Chek Complete 检测方法相当(99.24%[95%CI,98.05%至 99.79%]与 99.81%[95%CI,98.94%至 100.0%];  = 0.37)。在 29 例(4.53%)中,还检测到了其他腹泻病原体( spp.[ = 17]、轮状病毒[ = 7]和诺如病毒基因组 GII.4[ = 5])。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel Immunoassay in Stool Testing of Patients with Suspected () Infection.
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00710-19. Print 2019 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and Genotype Distribution of Sapovirus in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Glob Chall. 2025 Aug 5;9(9):e00369. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202400369. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Clinical outcomes and treatment necessity in patients with toxin-negative Clostridioides difficile stool samples.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 Apr 25;23(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00696-1.
3
Challenges and future solutions for detection of in adults.
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul-Aug;36(4):369-377. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0802. Epub 2023 May 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2016.
EFSA J. 2017 Dec 12;15(12):e05077. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5077. eCollection 2017 Dec.
3
Microbial identification from faces and urine in one step by two-photon excitation assay technique.
J Immunol Methods. 2018 Sep;460:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
4
Clostridium difficile and Clostridioides difficile: Two validly published and correct names.
Anaerobe. 2018 Aug;52:125-126. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
Viral gastroenteritis.
Lancet. 2018 Jul 14;392(10142):175-186. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31128-0. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
How to: evaluate a diagnostic test.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jan;25(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
7
The pitfalls of laboratory diagnostics of Clostridium difficile infection.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Jul;24(7):682-683. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
10
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Aug;22 Suppl 4:S63-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Jul 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验