Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 100, boulevard du général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France.
Target Oncol. 2012 Jun;7(2):107-16. doi: 10.1007/s11523-012-0219-8. Epub 2012 May 22.
Presence of liver metastases in neuroendocrine tumors is a major factor altering both quality of life and prognosis. Surgery is recognized as the sole curative treatment. When it is not possible, radiological directed therapies are crucial, particularly in liver metastases from the small bowel. Thermal ablative therapies as radiofrequency ablation and microwave are alternative treatments alone or in combination with surgery. Hepatic artery embolization or chemoembolization, as radioembolization, has been shown to have good clinical, biochemical, and morphological responses when liver burden does not permit ablative therapies. However, technical issues are multiple and there is no randomized study to compare their efficacy. The choice of management depends on liver burden and metastases pattern, but also on origin of the primary tumor, tumor differentiation, and tumor proliferative activity. These patients should benefit of a multidisciplinary management to limit morbidity and mortality.
肝脏转移的存在是改变神经内分泌肿瘤患者生活质量和预后的主要因素。手术被认为是唯一的治愈性治疗方法。当无法进行手术时,放射导向治疗至关重要,特别是对于小肠来源的肝脏转移灶。射频消融和微波等热消融治疗是单独或联合手术的替代治疗方法。肝动脉栓塞或化疗栓塞,如放射性栓塞,当肝脏负担不允许消融治疗时,已显示出良好的临床、生化和形态学反应。然而,技术问题很多,也没有随机研究比较它们的疗效。治疗方法的选择取决于肝脏负担和转移模式,但也取决于原发肿瘤的起源、肿瘤分化和肿瘤增殖活性。这些患者应受益于多学科管理,以降低发病率和死亡率。