Suppr超能文献

基于输液试验的经典鉴别与自动分流功能的比较。

Comparison between classic-differential and automatic shunt functioning on the basis of infusion tests.

作者信息

Czosnyka M, Maksymowicz W, Batorski L, Koszewski W, Czosnyka Z

机构信息

Warsaw University of Technology, Poland.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1990;106(1-2):1-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01809325.

Abstract

Infusion tests were performed in order to examine cerebrospinal compensatory ability in two groups of patients with impaired compensation, subjected to shunt implantation. The functioning of the classic differential shunts was compared to the automatically (Orbis-Sigma) functioning shunts. The reference group, with intact compensatory parameters is also presented. The influence of different types of shunts on the intracranial compensation ability was compared. Automatic shunts produce less decrease in the resorption resistance of CSF in the post-shunted examination than the classic differential shunts. Classic differential shunts disturb the mono-exponential character of the pressure-volume relationship in a higher degree than automatic shunts. Shunt functioning models were proposed as well as the method of detection of eventual recovery to the normal resorption reserve. This method can be applied only to patients with automatic shunts.

摘要

为了检查两组存在代偿功能受损且接受分流植入术的患者的脑脊液代偿能力,进行了灌注测试。将经典的压差分流器的功能与自动(奥比斯-西格玛)功能分流器进行了比较。还展示了具有完整代偿参数的参照组。比较了不同类型分流器对颅内代偿能力的影响。与经典的压差分流器相比,自动分流器在分流术后检查中导致脑脊液吸收阻力的降低幅度更小。经典的压差分流器比自动分流器更严重地干扰了压力-容量关系的单指数特征。提出了分流功能模型以及检测最终恢复到正常吸收储备的方法。该方法仅适用于使用自动分流器的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验