Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
J Am Chem Soc. 2012 Jul 18;134(28):11791-806. doi: 10.1021/ja3046298. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
Fe(IV)═O(TBC)(CH(3)CN) (TBC = 1,4,8,11-tetrabenzyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) is characterized, and its reactivity differences relative to Fe(IV)═O(TMC)(CH(3)CN) (TMC = 1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) are evaluated in hydrogen atom (H-atom) abstraction and oxo-transfer reactions. Structural differences are defined using X-ray absorption spectroscopy and correlated to reactivities using density functional theory. The S = 1 ground states are highly similar and result in large activation barriers (25 kcal/mol) due to steric interactions between the cyclam chelate and the substrate (e.g., ethylbenzene) associated with the equatorial π-attack required by this spin state. Conversely, H-atom abstraction reactivity on an S = 2 surface allows for a σ-attack with an axial substrate approach. This results in decreased steric interactions with the cyclam and a lower barrier (9 kcal/mol). For Fe(IV)═O(TBC)(CH(3)CN), the S = 2 excited state in the reactant is lower in energy and therefore more accessible at the transition state due to a weaker ligand field associated with the steric interactions of the benzyl substituents with the trans-axial ligand. This study is further extended to the oxo-transfer reaction, which is a two-electron process requiring both σ- and π-electron transfer and thus a nonlinear transition state. In oxo-transfer, the S = 2 has a lower barrier due to sequential vs concerted (S = 1) two electron transfer which gives a high-spin ferric intermediate at the transition state. The Fe(IV)═O(TBC)(CH(3)CN) complex is more distorted at the transition state, with the iron farther out of the equatorial plane due to the steric interaction of the benzyl groups with the trans-axial ligand. This allows for better orbital overlap with the substrate, a lower barrier, and an increased rate of oxo-transfer.
Fe(IV)═O(TBC)(CH(3)CN)(TBC=1,4,8,11-四苄基-1,4,8,11-四氮杂环十四烷)被表征,并评估了其相对于Fe(IV)═O(TMC)(CH(3)CN)(TMC=1,4,8,11-四甲基-1,4,8,11-四氮杂环十四烷)在氢原子(H-atom)抽取和氧转移反应中的反应性差异。使用 X 射线吸收光谱定义结构差异,并使用密度泛函理论将其与反应性相关联。S=1 基态非常相似,由于这个自旋态所需的赤道π-攻击与配体(如乙基苯)之间的环戊烷螯合与底物之间的空间位阻相互作用,导致大的活化能垒(约 25 kcal/mol)。相反,S=2 表面上的 H-atom 抽取反应允许轴向底物接近进行σ-攻击。这导致与环戊烷的空间位阻相互作用降低,并且势垒降低(约 9 kcal/mol)。对于Fe(IV)═O(TBC)(CH(3)CN),由于与苄基取代基与反轴向配体的空间位阻相关联的配体场较弱,反应物中的 S=2 激发态的能量更低,因此在过渡态处更容易到达。这项研究进一步扩展到氧转移反应,该反应是一个需要σ-和π-电子转移的两电子过程,因此是一个非线性过渡态。在氧转移中,由于顺序(S=2)与协同(S=1)两电子转移,S=2 具有较低的势垒,这在过渡态处给出高自旋的铁中间产物。Fe(IV)═O(TBC)(CH(3)CN) 配合物在过渡态处更扭曲,由于苄基与反轴向配体的空间位阻相互作用,铁更远离赤道平面。这允许与底物更好的轨道重叠,较低的势垒,以及增加的氧转移速率。