Scibek Jason S, Carcia Christopher R
Jason S Scibek, Department of Athletic Training, School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, John G Rangos, Sr., Pittsburgh, PA 15282, United States.
World J Orthop. 2012 Jun 18;3(6):87-94. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i6.87.
To develop a better understanding of scapulohumeral rhythm during scapular plane shoulder elevation.
Thirteen healthy, college-aged subjects participated in this study. Subjects were free from any upper extremity, neck or back pathology. A modified digital inclinometer was utilized to measure scapular upward rotation of the subject's dominant shoulder. Upward rotation was measured statically as subjects performed clinically relevant amounts of shoulder elevation in the scapular plane. Testing order was randomized by arm position. Scapular upward rotation was assessed over the entire arc of motion and over a series of increments. The percent contributions to shoulder elevation for the scapula and glenohumeral joint were calculated. Scapulohumeral rhythm was assessed and represented the ratio of glenohumeral motion to scapulothoracic motion (glenohumeral elevation: scapular upward rotation). A one-way ANOVA was used to compare scapular upward rotation between elevation increments.
Scapulohumeral rhythm for the entire arc of shoulder elevation was equal to a ratio of 2.34 :1 and ranged from 40.01:1 to 0.90:1 when assessed across the different increments of humeral elevation. Total scapular motion increased over the arc of shoulder elevation. The scapula contributed 2.53% of total motion for the first 30 degrees of shoulder elevation, between 20.87% and 37.53% for 30(o)-90(o) of shoulder elevation, and 52.73% for 90(o)-120(o) of shoulder elevation. Statistically significant differences in scapular upward rotation were identified across the shoulder elevation increments [F((3,48)) = 12.63, P = 0.0001].
Clinically, we must recognize the usefulness of the inclinometer in documenting the variable nature of scapulohumeral rhythm in healthy and injured shoulders.
更深入了解肩胛平面肩部抬高过程中的肩肱节律。
13名健康的大学生参与了本研究。受试者无任何上肢、颈部或背部病变。使用改良的数字倾角仪测量受试者优势肩的肩胛骨向上旋转。当受试者在肩胛平面进行临床相关量的肩部抬高时,静态测量向上旋转。测试顺序根据手臂位置随机确定。在整个运动弧和一系列增量上评估肩胛骨向上旋转。计算肩胛骨和盂肱关节对肩部抬高的百分比贡献。评估肩肱节律,其代表盂肱运动与肩胛胸壁运动的比值(盂肱抬高:肩胛骨向上旋转)。使用单因素方差分析比较抬高增量之间的肩胛骨向上旋转。
肩部抬高整个弧的肩肱节律等于2.34:1的比值,在评估肱骨抬高的不同增量时,范围为40.01:1至0.90:1。肩胛骨总运动在肩部抬高弧上增加。在肩部抬高的前30度,肩胛骨贡献了总运动的2.53%,在肩部抬高30°-90°之间贡献了20.87%至37.53%,在肩部抬高90°-120°时贡献了52.73%。在肩部抬高增量中发现肩胛骨向上旋转存在统计学显著差异[F(3,48)=12.63,P=0.0001]。
临床上,我们必须认识到倾角仪在记录健康和受伤肩部肩肱节律的可变性质方面的有用性。