Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, CMU - 1 rue Michel-Servet, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Trials. 2012 Jun 21;13:88. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-88.
Tobacco smoking is the leading avoidable cause of death in high-income countries. The smoking-related disease burden is borne primarily by the least educated and least affluent groups. Thus, there is a need for effective smoking cessation interventions that reach to, and are effective in this group. Research suggests that modest financial incentives are not very effective in helping smokers quit. What is not known is whether large financial incentives can enhance longer-term (1 year) smoking cessation rates, outside clinical and workplace settings.
A randomized, parallel groups, controlled trial.
Eight hundred low-income smokers in Switzerland (the less affluent third of the population, based on fiscal taxation).
A smoking cessation program including: (a) financial incentives given during 6 months; and (b) Internet-based counseling. Financial rewards will be offered for biochemically verified smoking abstinence after 1, 2, and 3 weeks and 1, 3, and 6 months, for a maximum of 1,500 CHF (1,250 EUR, 1,500 USD) for those abstinent at all time-points. All participants, including controls, will receive Internet-based, individually-tailored, smoking cessation counseling and self-help booklets, but there will be no in-person or telephone counseling, and participants will not receive medications. The control group will not receive financial incentives.
To increase smoking cessation rates.
Smoking abstinence after 6 and 18 months, not contradicted by biochemical tests. We will assess relapse after the end of the intervention, to test whether 6-month effects translate into sustained abstinence 12 months after the incentives are withdrawn.Randomization: Will be done using sealed envelopes drawn by participants.Blinding: Is not possible in this context.
Smoking prevention policies and interventions have been least effective in the least educated, low-income groups. Combining financial incentives and Internet-based counseling is an innovative approach that, if proven acceptable and effective, could be later implemented on a large scale at a reasonable cost, decrease health disparities, and save many lives.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04019434.
在高收入国家,吸烟是可避免的主要死亡原因。与吸烟有关的疾病负担主要由受教育程度最低和最贫困的群体承担。因此,需要有效的戒烟干预措施来覆盖这一群体,并对其产生效果。研究表明,适度的经济激励措施在帮助吸烟者戒烟方面效果并不显著。目前还不清楚的是,在临床和工作场所之外,大额经济激励措施是否可以提高长期(1 年)的戒烟率。
一项随机、平行组、对照试验。
瑞士 800 名低收入吸烟者(根据财政税收,属于较贫困的三分之一人群)。
一项戒烟计划,包括:(a)在 6 个月期间提供经济奖励;(b)基于互联网的咨询。对于在第 1、2、3 周和第 1、3、6 个月通过生物化学验证的戒烟者,将提供财务奖励,对于所有时间点都戒烟的人,最高可获得 1500 瑞士法郎(1250 欧元,1500 美元)。所有参与者,包括对照组,都将接受基于互联网的个性化戒烟咨询和自我帮助手册,但不会有面对面或电话咨询,参与者也不会服用药物。对照组不会获得经济奖励。
提高戒烟率。
6 个月和 18 个月后的吸烟戒断率,且未通过生物化学测试证实。我们将评估干预结束后的复吸情况,以检验 6 个月的效果是否转化为激励措施停止后 12 个月的持续戒断。随机化:将由参与者使用密封信封进行。
在这种情况下不可行。
在受教育程度最低、收入最低的群体中,吸烟预防政策和干预措施的效果最差。将经济激励措施和基于互联网的咨询相结合是一种创新方法,如果被证明是可接受和有效的,那么可以在以后以合理的成本大规模实施,减少健康差距,挽救许多生命。
当前对照试验 ISRCTN04019434。