• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解心力衰竭患者的求助决策:一项定性系统评价。

Understanding help-seeking decisions in people with heart failure: a qualitative systematic review.

机构信息

University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G2G3.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Dec;49(12):1582-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.05.010
PMID:22721677
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand the process of help-seeking among heart failure patients from the perspectives of patients, caregivers and health professionals.

DESIGN

Systematic review using qualitative meta-synthesis.

METHODS

A systematic search (20th May 2011) was conducted to identify studies published in English as full papers ≥1995 reporting primary qualitative data with extractable heart failure-specific data or themes related to help-seeking in patients, caregivers or health professionals. Databases searched were: CINAHL, Medline, PsycInfo, Social Science Citation Index, Embase, Social policy/Practice, SocIndex, Ageline, Health Source Nursing, Scopus; additionally, we consulted with experts and manually searched references.

RESULTS

58 studies (990 patients; 274 female, 527 male, 189 sex not described; 229 caregivers, 79 health professionals) were included. Heart failure help-seeking was embedded in daily experiences of heart failure but ongoing symptoms were confusing, ambiguous and disruptive; little support was available from professionals to interpret the presence and significance of fluctuations in symptoms for help-seeking. Other significant barriers to help-seeking were: avoidance-based coping, fear of hospitals and misplaced reluctance to be burdensome. Help-seeking was facilitated by good involvement and frank communication between patients, caregivers and health professionals and the presence of a sense of elevated personal risk.

CONCLUSION

Health services should harness primary care providers and support patients and caregivers to prioritize development of objective symptom monitoring skills, recognize and personally assimilate the elevated risks of heart failure and help-seeking delays and discourage avoidance-based coping and unwarranted concerns that downplay the significance of heart failure and urgency to address symptoms.

摘要

目的

从患者、照护者和卫生专业人员的角度了解心力衰竭患者寻求帮助的过程。

设计

系统综述采用定性元综合分析。

方法

系统检索(2011 年 5 月 20 日),以确定 1995 年以后发表的全文为英文的研究,报告了与心力衰竭患者、照护者或卫生专业人员的寻求帮助相关的原发性定性数据或主题。检索的数据库包括:CINAHL、Medline、PsycInfo、社会科学引文索引、Embase、社会政策/实践、SocIndex、Ageline、Health Source Nursing、Scopus;此外,我们还咨询了专家并手动检索了参考文献。

结果

共纳入 58 项研究(990 例患者;274 例女性,527 例男性,189 例未描述性别;229 例照护者,79 例卫生专业人员)。心力衰竭的寻求帮助是嵌入在心力衰竭的日常经历中的,但持续的症状是令人困惑、模糊和具有破坏性的;专业人员很少提供支持来解释症状波动的存在和意义,以帮助寻求帮助。寻求帮助的其他重要障碍包括:基于回避的应对方式、对医院的恐惧和对成为负担的不当不愿。患者、照护者和卫生专业人员之间的良好参与和坦诚沟通,以及对个人风险升高的感知,有助于促进寻求帮助。

结论

卫生服务机构应利用初级保健提供者,并支持患者和照护者优先发展客观的症状监测技能,认识并个人吸收心力衰竭和寻求帮助延迟的风险升高,并鼓励避免基于回避的应对方式和不必要的担忧,这些担忧会淡化心力衰竭的意义和解决症状的紧迫性。

相似文献

1
Understanding help-seeking decisions in people with heart failure: a qualitative systematic review.理解心力衰竭患者的求助决策:一项定性系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Dec;49(12):1582-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
5
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
6
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
7
The association between ethnicity and delay in seeking medical care for chest pain: a systematic review.种族与胸痛就医延迟之间的关联:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jul;14(7):208-35. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003012.
8
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
9
Early palliative interventions for improving outcomes in people with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers.早期姑息治疗干预对改善原发性脑恶性肿瘤患者及其照护者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013440.pub2.
10
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative exploration of participant and investigator perspectives from the TRED-HF trial.TRED-HF 试验中参与者和研究者观点的定性探讨。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3760-3768. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13524. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
2
The Perspectives of Patients with Chronic Diseases and Their Caregivers on Self-Management Interventions: A Scoping Review of Reviews.慢性病患者及其照护者对自我管理干预措施的看法:系统评价综述。
Patient. 2021 Nov;14(6):719-740. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00514-2. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
Self-care perception and behaviour in patients with heart failure: A qualitative and quantitative study.
心力衰竭患者的自我护理感知和行为:定性和定量研究。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;8(3):2079-2088. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13287. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
4
Challenges in physician-patient communication for optimal management of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a discourse analysis.系统性硬化症相关间质性肺病优化管理中医生-患者沟通的挑战:一项话语分析
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;39(10):2989-2998. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05063-x. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
5
Self-Care Monitoring of Heart Failure Symptoms and Lung Impedance at Home Following Hospital Discharge: Longitudinal Study.出院后在家中对心力衰竭症状和肺阻抗进行自我护理监测:纵向研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 7;22(1):e15445. doi: 10.2196/15445.
6
Using vignettes to understand heart failure self-care.使用案例研究来理解心力衰竭自我护理。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Oct;27(19-20):3554-3560. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14581. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
7
A Triangulated Qualitative Study of Veteran Decision-Making to Seek Care During Heart Failure Exacerbation: Implications of Dual Health System Use.一项关于退伍军人在心力衰竭加重期间寻求治疗决策的三角定性研究:双重医疗系统使用的影响。
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958017751506. doi: 10.1177/0046958017751506.
8
Stoic beliefs and health: development and preliminary validation of the Pathak-Wieten Stoicism Ideology Scale.斯多葛主义信念与健康:帕塔克 - 维滕斯多葛主义意识形态量表的编制与初步验证
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 14;7(11):e015137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015137.
9
Managing expectations: cognitive authority and experienced control in complex healthcare processes.管理期望:复杂医疗过程中的认知权威与经验控制
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 5;17(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2366-1.
10
Understanding heart failure; explaining telehealth - a hermeneutic systematic review.理解心力衰竭;解读远程医疗——一项诠释学系统评价。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jun 14;17(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0594-2.