Suppr超能文献

用于评估镇痛药物治疗效果的人体实验性疼痛模型。

Human experimental pain models for assessing the therapeutic efficacy of analgesic drugs.

机构信息

Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Aalborg Hospital, Mølleparkvej 4, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Pharmacol Rev. 2012 Jul;64(3):722-79. doi: 10.1124/pr.111.005447. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

Abstract

Pain models in animals have shown low predictivity for analgesic efficacy in humans, and clinical studies are often very confounded, blurring the evaluation. Human experimental pain models may therefore help to evaluate mechanisms and effect of analgesics and bridge findings from basic studies to the clinic. The present review outlines the concept and limitations of human experimental pain models and addresses analgesic efficacy in healthy volunteers and patients. Experimental models to evoke pain and hyperalgesia are available for most tissues. In healthy volunteers, the effect of acetaminophen is difficult to detect unless neurophysiological methods are used, whereas the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs could be detected in most models. Anticonvulsants and antidepressants are sensitive in several models, particularly in models inducing hyperalgesia. For opioids, tonic pain with high intensity is attenuated more than short-lasting pain and nonpainful sensations. Fewer studies were performed in patients. In general, the sensitivity to analgesics is better in patients than in healthy volunteers, but the lower number of studies may bias the results. Experimental models have variable reliability, and validity shall be interpreted with caution. Models including deep, tonic pain and hyperalgesia are better to predict the effects of analgesics. Assessment with neurophysiologic methods and imaging is valuable as a supplement to psychophysical methods and can increase sensitivity. The models need to be designed with careful consideration of pharmacological mechanisms and pharmacokinetics of analgesics. Knowledge obtained from this review can help design experimental pain studies for new compounds entering phase I and II clinical trials.

摘要

动物疼痛模型对人类的镇痛疗效预测性较低,且临床研究往往非常复杂,使评估结果变得模糊。因此,人类实验性疼痛模型可以帮助评估镇痛药物的作用机制,并将基础研究的结果与临床联系起来。本综述概述了人类实验性疼痛模型的概念和局限性,并探讨了健康志愿者和患者的镇痛疗效。用于诱发疼痛和痛觉过敏的实验模型可用于大多数组织。在健康志愿者中,除非使用神经生理学方法,否则很难检测到对乙酰氨基酚的作用,而大多数模型中都可以检测到非甾体抗炎药的作用。抗惊厥药和抗抑郁药在几种模型中均敏感,尤其是在诱发痛觉过敏的模型中。对于阿片类药物,高强度的持续性疼痛比短暂性疼痛和非疼痛感觉更能被缓解。在患者中进行的研究较少。一般来说,患者对镇痛药的敏感性优于健康志愿者,但由于研究数量较少,可能会导致结果出现偏差。实验模型的可靠性存在差异,有效性的解释应谨慎进行。包括深部、持续性疼痛和痛觉过敏的模型更能预测镇痛药的效果。神经生理学方法和影像学评估作为心理物理学方法的补充是有价值的,可提高敏感性。在设计实验性疼痛模型时,需要仔细考虑镇痛药物的药理学机制和药代动力学。本综述提供的知识可帮助设计新化合物进入 I 期和 II 期临床试验的实验性疼痛研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验