• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用认知绘图法来定义成功开展查房的关键领域。

Using cognitive mapping to define key domains for successful attending rounds.

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Internal Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Nov;27(11):1492-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2121-6. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-012-2121-6
PMID:22722975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3475821/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ward attending rounds are an integral part of internal medicine education. Being a good teacher is necessary, but not sufficient for successful rounds. Understanding perceptions of successful attending rounds (AR) may help define key areas of focus for enhancing learning, teaching and patient care.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to expand the conceptual framework of 30 previously identified attributes contributing to successful AR by: 1) identifying the most important attributes, 2) grouping similar attributes, and 3) creating a cognitive map to define dimensions and domains contributing to successful rounds.

DESIGN

Multi-institutional, cross-sectional study design.

PARTICIPANTS

We recruited residents and medical students from a university-based internal medicine residency program and a community-based family medicine residency program. Faculty attending a regional general medicine conference, affiliated with multiple institutions, also participated.

MAIN MEASURES

Participants performed an unforced card-sorting exercise, grouping attributes based on perceived similarity, then rated the importance of attributes on a 5-point Likert scale. We translated our data into a cognitive map through multi-dimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis.

KEY RESULTS

Thirty-six faculty, 49 residents and 40 students participated. The highest rated attributes (mean rating) were "Teach by example (bedside manner)" (4.50), "Sharing of attending's thought processes" (4.46), "Be approachable-not intimidating" (4.45), "Insist on respect for all team members" (4.43), "Conduct rounds in an organized, efficient & timely fashion" (4.39), and "State expectations for residents/students" (4.37). Attributes were plotted on a two-dimensional cognitive map, and adequate convergence was achieved. We identified five distinct domains of related attributes: 1) Learning Atmosphere, 2) Clinical Teaching, 3) Teaching Style, 4) Communicating Expectations, and 5) Team Management.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified five domains of related attributes essential to the success of ward attending rounds.

摘要

背景

病房查房是内科医学教育的重要组成部分。成为一名好老师是必要的,但对于成功的查房来说还不够。了解成功查房的认知观念可能有助于确定重点关注领域,以提高学习、教学和患者护理的质量。

目的

我们旨在通过以下方式扩展 30 项先前确定的有助于成功查房的属性的概念框架:1)确定最重要的属性;2)将相似的属性分组;3)创建认知图以定义有助于成功查房的维度和领域。

设计

多机构、横断面研究设计。

参与者

我们从一所大学的内科住院医师培训计划和一所社区为基础的家庭医学住院医师培训计划中招募住院医师和医学生,参加一个区域普通医学会议的多机构附属教员也参与了研究。

主要措施

参与者进行了非强制性的卡片分类练习,根据感知的相似性对属性进行分组,然后对属性的重要性进行 5 点李克特量表评分。我们通过多维尺度分析和层次聚类分析将我们的数据转化为认知图。

主要结果

共有 36 名教员、49 名住院医师和 40 名学生参与了研究。评分最高的属性(平均评分)为:“以身作则(床边态度)”(4.50)、“分享主治医生的思维过程”(4.46)、“易于接近而不令人生畏”(4.45)、“坚持尊重所有团队成员”(4.43)、“以组织、高效和及时的方式进行查房”(4.39)以及“向住院医师/学生说明期望”(4.37)。属性被绘制在二维认知图上,并且达到了足够的收敛。我们确定了五个不同的相关属性领域:1)学习氛围,2)临床教学,3)教学风格,4)沟通期望,以及 5)团队管理。

结论

我们确定了五个与病房查房成功相关的属性领域,这些领域对于成功查房至关重要。

相似文献

1
Using cognitive mapping to define key domains for successful attending rounds.运用认知绘图法来定义成功开展查房的关键领域。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Nov;27(11):1492-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2121-6. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
2
Rounds Today: A Qualitative Study of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics Resident Perceptions.今日查房:一项关于内科和儿科住院医师认知的定性研究
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Oct;8(4):523-531. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00106.1.
3
Contextual Influences of Trainee Characteristics and Daily Workload on Trainee Learning Preferences.实习生特征和日常工作量对实习生学习偏好的情境影响
J Hosp Med. 2017 Jul;12(7):558-561. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2771.
4
A pilot study using nominal group technique to assess residents' perceptions of successful attending rounds.一项使用名义小组技术评估住院医师对成功查房看法的试点研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):1060-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0668-z.
5
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study.学习者对内科查房的看法:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Jul 9;10:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-53.
6
The art of bedside rounds: a multi-center qualitative study of strategies used by experienced bedside teachers.床边查房的艺术:一项多中心定性研究,探讨经验丰富的床边教师所使用的策略。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar;28(3):412-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2259-2. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
7
Student involvement on teaching rounds.学生参与教学查房。
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10 Suppl):S19-21. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31814004d7.
8
Bedside Rounds Valued But Not Preferred: Perceptions of Internal Medicine Residents and Attending Physicians in a Diverse Academic Training Program.床边查房虽受重视但并非首选:不同学术培训项目中内科住院医师和主治医师的看法
South Med J. 2017 Aug;110(8):531-537. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000689.
9
What's the Purpose of Rounds? A Qualitative Study Examining the Perceptions of Faculty and Students.查房的目的是什么?一项关于教师和学生看法的定性研究
J Hosp Med. 2017 Nov;12(11):892-897. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2835. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
10
Patient Satisfaction with Bedside Teaching Rounds Compared with Nonbedside Rounds.与非床边查房相比,患者对床边教学查房的满意度。
South Med J. 2016 Feb;109(2):112-5. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000419.

引用本文的文献

1
Pearls of Wisdom from Teaching Rounds: Reconceptualizing "See One, Do One" as Social Learning.教学查房中的智慧结晶:将“看一个,做一个”重新概念化为社会学习。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Oct 1;35(1):303-309. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02184-9. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Resident Perspectives Regarding Education on Attending Rounds.住院医师对上级医师查房教育的看法。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Mar 3;12:23821205251324019. doi: 10.1177/23821205251324019. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
The educational value of ward rounds as a learning and teaching opportunity for house officers, medical officers, and registrars in Sudanese hospitals: a multi-center cross-sectional study.病房查房对住院医师、住院医师和住院医师在苏丹医院的学习和教学的教育价值:一项多中心横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04404-z.
4
Industrial designers' thinking in the stage of concept generation for social design: themes, strategies and modes.工业设计师在社会设计概念生成阶段的思维:主题、策略与模式。
Int J Technol Des Educ. 2023;33(1):281-311. doi: 10.1007/s10798-022-09732-7. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
5
Understanding Physicians' Perceptions of Patient-Identified Barriers to Osteoporosis Medication Initiation: A Cognitive Mapping Approach.了解医生对患者所指出的骨质疏松症药物治疗起始障碍的看法:一种认知映射方法。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Jul 5;15:1293-1302. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S361559. eCollection 2022.
6
Interruptions to Attending Physician Rounds and Their Effect on Resident Education.主治医师查房的中断及其对住院医师教育的影响。
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2):266-275. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00698.1. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
7
Challenges and strategies of clinical rounds from the perspective of medical students: A qualitative research.从医学生视角看临床查房的挑战与策略:一项质性研究
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jan 28;10:6. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_104_20. eCollection 2021.
8
Pre-clerkship medical students' perceptions of medical professionalism.医学生对医学职业精神的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 1;19(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1629-4.
9
Strategies for teaching in clinical rounds: A systematic review of the literature.临床查房教学策略:文献系统综述
J Res Med Sci. 2019 Apr 26;24:33. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_460_18. eCollection 2019.
10
Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers.识别良好临床查房的挑战:一项针对医学教师的焦点小组研究。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2019 Apr;7(2):62-73. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2019.44710.

本文引用的文献

1
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study.学习者对内科查房的看法:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Jul 9;10:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-53.
2
Teaching clinical reasoning: case-based and coached.临床推理教学:基于案例和辅导式。
Acad Med. 2010 Jul;85(7):1118-24. doi: 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181d5dd0d.
3
Attending rounds and bedside case presentations: medical student and medicine resident experiences and attitudes.参加查房和床边病例汇报:医学生和住院医师的经验和态度。
Teach Learn Med. 2009 Apr-Jun;21(2):105-10. doi: 10.1080/10401330902791156.
4
A pilot study using nominal group technique to assess residents' perceptions of successful attending rounds.一项使用名义小组技术评估住院医师对成功查房看法的试点研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):1060-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0668-z.
5
The chromosomal analysis of teaching: the search for promoter genes.教学的染色体分析:启动子基因的探寻
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2007;118:123-32.
6
Teaching internal medicine residents in the new era. Inpatient attending with duty-hour regulations.新时代内科住院医师的教学。有值班时间规定的住院主治医师。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):447-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00425.x.
7
Nominal group technique: a process for identifying diabetes self-care issues among patients and caregivers.名义群体技术:一种在患者和护理人员中识别糖尿病自我护理问题的方法。
Diabetes Educ. 2000 Mar-Apr;26(2):305-10, 312, 314. doi: 10.1177/014572170002600211.
8
Attributes of excellent attending-physician role models.优秀主治医生榜样的特质。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 31;339(27):1986-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812313392706.
9
What if Osler were one of us? Inpatient teaching today.要是奥斯勒是我们中的一员会怎样?当今的住院医师教学。
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Apr;12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S41-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.12.s2.6.x.
10
What clinical teachers in medicine need to know.医学临床教师需要了解的内容。
Acad Med. 1994 May;69(5):333-42. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199405000-00003.