Douglas R. Wholey, PhD, is Professor, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. E-mail:
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Oct-Dec;38(4):272-83. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31825f3df9.
Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of primary care treatment of patients with chronic illness is an important goal in reforming the U.S. health care system. Reducing occupational conflicts and creating interdependent primary care teams is crucial for the effective functioning of new models being developed to reorganize chronic care. Occupational conflict, role interdependence, and resistance to change in a proof-of-concept pilot test of one such model that uses a new kind of employee in the primary care office, a "care guide," were analyzed. Care guides are lay individuals who help chronic disease patients and their providers achieve standard health goals.
The aim of this study was to examine the development of occupational boundaries, interdependence of care guides and primary care team members, and acceptance by clinic employees of this new kind of health worker.
METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A mixed methods, pilot study was conducted using qualitative analysis; clinic, provider, and patient surveys; administrative data; and multivariate analysis. Qualitative analysis examined the emergence of the care guide role. Administrative data and surveys were used to examine patterns of interdependence between care guides, physicians, team members, and clinic staff; obtain physician evaluations of the care guide role; and evaluate the effect of care guides on patient perceptions of care coordination and follow-up.
Evaluation of implementation of the care guide model showed that (a) the care guide scope of practice was clearly defined; (b) interdependent relationships between care guides and providers were formed; (c) relational triads consisting of patient, care guide, and physician were created; (d) patients and providers were supported in managing chronic disease; and (e) resistance to this model among traditional employees was minimized.
The feasibility of implementing a new care model for chronic disease management in the primary care setting, identifying factors associated with a positive organizational experience, was shown in this study.
提高初级保健治疗慢性病患者的效率和效果是改革美国医疗保健系统的一个重要目标。减少职业冲突和建立相互依存的初级保健团队对于有效运作正在开发的新模型至关重要,这些模型旨在重新组织慢性病护理。本研究分析了一个试点测试的职业冲突、角色相互依存和对变革的抵制,该测试是一种使用初级保健办公室新型员工(“护理指导”)的新模型。护理指导是帮助慢性病患者及其提供者实现标准健康目标的非专业人员。
本研究旨在考察护理指导的职业边界的发展、护理指导与初级保健团队成员的相互依存关系以及诊所员工对这种新型卫生工作者的接受程度。
方法/方法:采用混合方法、试点研究,使用定性分析;诊所、提供者和患者调查;行政数据;和多元分析。定性分析考察了护理指导角色的出现。行政数据和调查用于考察护理指导、医生、团队成员和诊所工作人员之间的相互依存模式;获得医生对护理指导角色的评价;并评估护理指导对患者对护理协调和随访的看法的影响。
对护理指导模型实施情况的评估表明:(a) 明确界定了护理指导的实践范围;(b) 形成了护理指导与提供者之间的相互依存关系;(c) 创建了由患者、护理指导和医生组成的关系三角;(d) 为患者和提供者提供了慢性病管理支持;(e) 最大限度地减少了传统员工对这种模式的抵制。
本研究表明,在初级保健环境中实施慢性病管理新护理模式的可行性,以及确定与积极组织体验相关的因素。