• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习分类器和频域光学相干断层扫描技术在青光眼诊断中的敏感性和特异性

Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers and spectral domain OCT for the diagnosis of glaucoma.

作者信息

Vidotti Vanessa G, Costa Vital P, Silva Fabrício R, Resende Graziela M, Cremasco Fernanda, Dias Marcelo, Gomi Edson S

机构信息

Glaucoma Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Campinas, Campinas - Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun 15:0. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000183.

DOI:10.5301/ejo.5000183
PMID:22729440
Abstract

Purpose. To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers (MLC) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Methods. Sixty-two patients with early to moderate glaucomatous visual field damage and 48 healthy individuals were included. All subjects underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, achromatic standard automated perimetry, and RNFL imaging with SD-OCT (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, California, USA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained for all SD-OCT parameters. Subsequently, the following MLCs were tested: Classification Tree (CTREE), Random Forest (RAN), Bagging (BAG), AdaBoost M1 (ADA), Ensemble Selection (ENS), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Radial Basis Function (RBF), Naive-Bayes (NB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Areas under the ROC curves (aROCs) obtained for each parameter and each MLC were compared. Results. The mean age was 57.0±9.2 years for healthy individuals and 59.9±9.0 years for glaucoma patients (p=0.103). Mean deviation values were -4.1±2.4 dB for glaucoma patients and -1.5±1.6 dB for healthy individuals (p<0.001). The SD-OCT parameters with the greater aROCs were inferior quadrant (0.813), average thickness (0.807), 7 o'clock position (0.765), and 6 o'clock position (0.754). The aROCs from classifiers varied from 0.785 (ADA) to 0.818 (BAG). The aROC obtained with BAG was not significantly different from the aROC obtained with the best single SD-OCT parameter (p=0.93). Conclusions. The SD-OCT showed good diagnostic accuracy in a group of patients with early glaucoma. In this series, MLCs did not improve the sensitivity and specificity of SD-OCT for the diagnosis of glaucoma.

摘要

目的。研究机器学习分类器(MLC)和频域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)在青光眼诊断中的敏感性和特异性。方法。纳入62例早期至中度青光眼性视野损害患者和48例健康个体。所有受试者均接受了全面的眼科检查、无色标准自动视野计检查以及使用SD-OCT(Cirrus HD-OCT;卡尔蔡司医疗技术公司,美国加利福尼亚州都柏林)进行的视网膜神经纤维层成像。获取所有SD-OCT参数的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。随后,测试了以下MLC:分类树(CTREE)、随机森林(RAN)、装袋法(BAG)、自适应增强M1(ADA)、集成选择(ENS)、多层感知器(MLP)、径向基函数(RBF)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)和支持向量机(SVM)。比较每个参数和每个MLC获得的ROC曲线下面积(aROC)。结果。健康个体的平均年龄为57.0±9.2岁,青光眼患者为59.9±9.0岁(p = 0.103)。青光眼患者的平均偏差值为-4.1±2.4 dB,健康个体为-1.5±1.6 dB(p<0.001)。aROC较大的SD-OCT参数为下象限(0.813)、平均厚度(0.807)、7点钟位置(0.765)和6点钟位置(0.754)。分类器的aROC范围为0.785(ADA)至0.818(BAG)。BAG获得的aROC与最佳单一SD-OCT参数获得的aROC无显著差异(p = 0.93)。结论。SD-OCT在一组早期青光眼患者中显示出良好的诊断准确性。在本系列研究中,MLC并未提高SD-OCT对青光眼诊断的敏感性和特异性。

相似文献

1
Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers and spectral domain OCT for the diagnosis of glaucoma.机器学习分类器和频域光学相干断层扫描技术在青光眼诊断中的敏感性和特异性
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun 15:0. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000183.
2
Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Spectral Domain OCT and standard automated perimetry.使用光谱域光学相干断层扫描和标准自动视野计的机器学习分类器对青光眼诊断的敏感性和特异性。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2013 May-Jun;76(3):170-4. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492013000300008.
3
Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT.使用频域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)的视网膜神经纤维层和视神经数据的机器学习分类器对青光眼的诊断准确性
J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:789129. doi: 10.1155/2013/789129. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
4
Bayesian machine learning classifiers for combining structural and functional measurements to classify healthy and glaucomatous eyes.用于结合结构和功能测量以对健康眼睛和青光眼眼睛进行分类的贝叶斯机器学习分类器。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Mar;49(3):945-53. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1083.
5
Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma.StratusOCT用于视野性青光眼的敏感度和特异性
Ophthalmology. 2005 Jan;112(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.06.039.
6
Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study.光谱域光学相干断层扫描技术对视网膜神经纤维层的成像:变异性与诊断性能研究
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jul;116(7):1257-63, 1263.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.013. Epub 2009 May 22.
7
Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: analysis of the retinal nerve fiber layer map for glaucoma detection.频域光学相干断层扫描的视网膜神经纤维层成像:用于青光眼检测的视网膜神经纤维层图分析。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Sep;117(9):1684-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.026. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
8
Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in diagnosing early to moderate glaucoma.时域与频域光学相干断层扫描技术在诊断早期至中度青光眼方面的敏感性和特异性
Ophthalmology. 2009 Dec;116(12):2294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.012. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
9
Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography versus spectral optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in the diagnosis of glaucoma.脉络膜高清光学相干断层扫描与频域光学相干断层扫描/扫频激光检眼镜在青光眼诊断中的比较。
Curr Eye Res. 2014 Jan;39(1):62-8. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.824989. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
10
Automated algorithms combining structure and function outperform general ophthalmologists in diagnosing glaucoma.自动化算法结合结构和功能,在诊断青光眼方面优于普通眼科医生。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0207784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207784. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications of machine learning in glaucoma diagnosis based on tabular data: a systematic review.基于表格数据的机器学习在青光眼诊断中的应用:一项系统综述。
BMC Biomed Eng. 2025 Aug 1;7(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s42490-025-00095-3.
2
Artificial intelligence in glaucoma: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.人工智能在青光眼领域的应用:机遇、挑战与未来方向。
Biomed Eng Online. 2023 Dec 16;22(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01187-8.
3
Optical Coherence Tomography and Glaucoma.光学相干断层扫描与青光眼。
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2021 Sep 15;7:693-726. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-100419-111350. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
4
Machine Learning Models for Diagnosing Glaucoma from Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.机器学习模型用于从视网膜神经纤维层厚度图诊断青光眼。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019 Nov-Dec;2(6):422-428. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
5
Artificial Intelligence and Ophthalmology.人工智能与眼科学。
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 5;50(1):37-43. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.78989.
6
Automated algorithms combining structure and function outperform general ophthalmologists in diagnosing glaucoma.自动化算法结合结构和功能,在诊断青光眼方面优于普通眼科医生。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0207784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207784. eCollection 2018.
7
Effects of misalignments in the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements with spectral domain optical coherence tomography.光谱域光学相干断层扫描测量视网膜神经纤维层厚度时对准不良的影响。
J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:412915. doi: 10.1155/2014/412915. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
8
Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT.使用频域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)的视网膜神经纤维层和视神经数据的机器学习分类器对青光眼的诊断准确性
J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:789129. doi: 10.1155/2013/789129. Epub 2013 Nov 28.