• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Awareness and uptake of direct-to-consumer genetic testing among cancer cases, their relatives, and controls: the Northwest Cancer Genetics Network.癌症患者、其亲属及对照人群中对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认知与接受情况:西北癌症遗传学网络
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012 Jul;16(7):744-8. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0235. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
2
Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Findings from the 2013 U.S. Health Information National Trends Survey.公众对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认知:来自2013年美国健康信息国家趋势调查的结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):799-807. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0784-x.
3
Awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic tests and use of genetic tests among Puerto Rican adults, 2009.波多黎各成年人对直接面向消费者的基因检测和基因检测使用的意识,2009 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Sep;8(5):A110. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
4
Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.澳大利亚人对直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测的知识和看法。
Intern Med J. 2014 Jan;44(1):27-31. doi: 10.1111/imj.12289.
5
Assessing the general public's view of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing and their interpretation of DTC website disclaimer messages.评估公众对直接面向消费者(DTC)基因检测的看法以及他们对 DTC 网站免责声明信息的解读。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Aug;31(8):939-944. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01411-y. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
6
Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study.与直接面向消费者的基因检测接受度、考虑因素及采用意愿相关的因素:一项调查研究
Public Health Genomics. 2018;21(1-2):45-52. doi: 10.1159/000492960. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
7
Survey of Professionals of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA) towards Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.欧洲公共卫生协会(EUPHA)专业人士对直接面向消费者的基因检测的看法调查。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;33(1):139-145. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac139.
8
Attitudes about regulation among direct-to-consumer genetic testing customers.直接面向消费者的基因检测客户对监管的态度。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013 May;17(5):424-8. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0453. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
9
Playing a part in research? University students' attitudes to direct-to-consumer genomics.参与研究?大学生对直接面向消费者的基因组学的态度。
Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(3):158-68. doi: 10.1159/000360257. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
10
Health-care referrals from direct-to-consumer genetic testing.来自直接面向消费者的基因检测的医疗保健转诊。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2010 Dec;14(6):817-9. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2010.0051. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Dutch citizens' perspectives, expectations, and decision-making regarding health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT).探索荷兰公民对与健康相关的直接面向消费者的基因检测(DTC-GT)的看法、期望和决策过程。
Public Health Genomics. 2025 Jul 22;28(1):1-36. doi: 10.1159/000547527.
2
Test-takers' perspectives on consumer genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk.受试者对遗传性癌症风险的消费者基因检测的看法。
Front Genet. 2024 Jul 10;15:1374602. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1374602. eCollection 2024.
3
Changes in acceptability, consideration, intention, and uptake of direct-to-consumer genetic tests in the Netherlands from 2017 to 2022.2017年至2022年荷兰消费者直接购买基因检测的可接受性、考虑因素、意愿及采用情况的变化。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Feb;34(1):e1919. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1919. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
4
Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study.与直接面向消费者的基因检测接受度、考虑因素及采用意愿相关的因素:一项调查研究
Public Health Genomics. 2018;21(1-2):45-52. doi: 10.1159/000492960. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
5
Attitudes towards personal genomics among older Swiss adults: An exploratory study.瑞士老年成年人对个人基因组学的态度:一项探索性研究。
Appl Transl Genom. 2016 Feb 1;8:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2016.01.009. eCollection 2016 Mar.
6
Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.基于互联网的直接面向消费者的基因检测:一项系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 14;17(12):e279. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4378.
7
Personalized Medicine Through SNP Testing for Breast Cancer Risk: Clinical Implementation.通过单核苷酸多态性检测评估乳腺癌风险实现个性化医疗:临床应用
J Genet Couns. 2015 Oct;24(5):744-51. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9803-7. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
8
Influence of individual differences in disease perception on consumer response to direct-to-consumer genomic testing.疾病认知中的个体差异对消费者对直接面向消费者的基因检测反应的影响。
Clin Genet. 2015 Mar;87(3):225-32. doi: 10.1111/cge.12419. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
9
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies.直接面向消费者的基因检测与个人基因组学服务:近期实证研究综述
Curr Genet Med Rep. 2013 Sep;1(3):182-200. doi: 10.1007/s40142-013-0018-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary care physicians' awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.初级保健医生对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认知、经验和看法。
J Genet Couns. 2012 Feb;21(1):113-26. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9390-9. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
2
Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing.对乳腺癌风险适度变化的基因检测的关注:对单核苷酸多态性检测的影响。
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(3):178-89. doi: 10.1159/000324703. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
3
Consumers' use of web-based information and their decisions about multiplex genetic susceptibility testing.消费者对基于网络信息的使用及其关于多重基因易感性检测的决策。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Sep 29;12(3):e41. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1587.
4
Size of the direct-to-consumer genomic testing market.直接面向消费者的基因组检测市场规模。
Genet Med. 2010 Sep;12(9):594. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181ead743.
5
Bioethical and clinical dilemmas of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: the problem of misattributed equivalence.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测的生物伦理和临床困境:错误归因等价性问题。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Feb 3;2(17):17cm5. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000214.
6
Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.社交网络用户对直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测的态度。
Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):3-10. doi: 10.1080/15265160902928209.
7
Health care provider and consumer awareness, perceptions, and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests, United States, 2008.2008年美国医疗服务提供者及消费者对直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测的认知、看法及使用情况
Genet Med. 2009 Aug;11(8):595. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b1cc2c.
8
Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006.公众对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认知与使用情况:2006年三项基于州人口的调查结果
Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):442-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.131631. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
9
An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测的一个不良副作用:侵占医疗公共资源。
JAMA. 2008 Dec 10;300(22):2669-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.803.
10
Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?让基因组从瓶中释放——我们会如愿以偿吗?
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 10;358(2):105-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0708162.

癌症患者、其亲属及对照人群中对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认知与接受情况:西北癌症遗传学网络

Awareness and uptake of direct-to-consumer genetic testing among cancer cases, their relatives, and controls: the Northwest Cancer Genetics Network.

作者信息

Hall Taryn O, Renz Anne D, Snapinn Katherine W, Bowen Deborah J, Edwards Karen L

机构信息

Institute for Public Health Genetics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98115, USA.

出版信息

Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012 Jul;16(7):744-8. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0235. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1089/gtmb.2011.0235
PMID:22731649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4077008/
Abstract

AIMS

To determine if awareness of, interest in, and use of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing is greater in a sample of high-risk individuals (cancer cases and their relatives), compared to controls.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from the Northwest Cancer Genetics Network. A follow-up survey was mailed to participants to assess DTC genetic testing awareness, interest, and use.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred sixty-seven participants responded to the survey. Forty-nine percent of respondents were aware of DTC genetic testing. Of those aware, 19% indicated interest in obtaining and <1% reported having used DTC genetic testing. Additional information supplied by respondents who reported use of DTC genetic tests indicated that 55% of these respondents likely engaged in clinical genetic testing, rather than DTC genetic testing.

CONCLUSION

Awareness of DTC genetic testing was greater in our sample of high-risk individuals than in controls and population-based studies. Although interest in and use of these tests among cases in our sample were equivalent to other population-based studies, interest in testing was higher among relatives and people who self-referred for a registry focused on cancer than among cases and controls. Additionally, our results suggest that there may be some confusion about what constitutes DTC genetic testing.

摘要

目的

确定与对照组相比,高危个体(癌症患者及其亲属)样本对直接面向消费者(DTC)基因检测的知晓度、兴趣和使用情况是否更高。

方法

参与者从西北癌症遗传学网络招募。向参与者邮寄一份随访调查问卷,以评估DTC基因检测的知晓度、兴趣和使用情况。

结果

1267名参与者回复了调查问卷。49%的受访者知晓DTC基因检测。在知晓者中,19%表示有兴趣获取,不到1%报告使用过DTC基因检测。报告使用过DTC基因检测的受访者提供的其他信息表明,这些受访者中有55%可能进行的是临床基因检测,而非DTC基因检测。

结论

在我们的高危个体样本中,对DTC基因检测的知晓度高于对照组和基于人群的研究。尽管我们样本中患者对这些检测的兴趣和使用情况与其他基于人群的研究相当,但亲属以及为专注于癌症的登记处自行转诊的人对检测的兴趣高于患者和对照组。此外,我们的结果表明,对于什么构成DTC基因检测可能存在一些混淆。